Satellite Shooting Unneeded Says Scientist
Posted on: Tuesday, 26 August 2008, 12:01 CDT
The U.S. Navy's February missile shoot down of a spy satellite was unnecessary, a Harvard scientist and former NASA employee said.
Yousaf Butt filed a Freedom of Information Act request asking for the National Air and Space Agency's re-entry threat analysis from the disabled USA-193 satellite. His conclusions contradict the government's official explanation that the satellite's hydrazine fuel tank posed a health hazard.
Butt described government modeling as oversimplified and biased against likelihoods that the tank would have burned when re-entering the atmosphere.
"The official study released so far certainly doesn't support the contention that the tank
would have survived intact to the ground. In fact, despite its optimistic oversimplifications, the
released study indicates that the tank would certainly have demised high up in the atmosphere" he wrote in the Aug. 21 Bulletin of Atomic Scientists.
Source: United Press International
Related Articles
- Simmons Corp. and Numerex Develop Satellite-based Integrated Solution for Agriculture Tank Monitoring
- Satellite Threat Eliminated
- Missile Destroys Satellite on First Shot
- Scientists Reinvent Use for Satellites
- Iraqi Protesters Burn Two British Tanks in Basra
- Nearly finished $239 million satellite falls to floor
- $239M Satellite Damaged at Lockheed Plant
- Democrats Slam Lack of Iraqi WMD Finds
- CIA Adviser: Progress in Iraqi WMD Hunt
- Satellite Radio Set for Takeoff in U.S.
 |
 |
User Comments (0)
RSS Feeds