U.S. Congress Challenged to Reduce Risk from North Korea and Iran’s Long-Range Ballistic Missiles
WASHINGTON, July 15 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ — Riki Ellison, President and Founder of the Missile Defense Advocacy Alliance (MDAA), www.missiledefenseadvocacy.org, distributed a White Paper on the need for the continued deployment of our nation’s ground-based interceptors (GBIs). He explains the threats from Iran and North Korea, he elaborates on the Shot Doctrine of “look-shoot-look” and he calls for action by the Congress to move forward on reducing the risk to our national security from long-range ballistic missiles being developed by Iran and North Korea.
Extracts of the MDAA White Paper are as follows:
Secretary Robert Gates and President Obama’s Administration have requested a drawdown of 32 percent in the 2010 fiscal year budget for the long-range ballistic missile defense system – a specific reduction from 44 ground-based interceptors to 30 ground-based interceptors – to protect the United States of America from long-range ballistic missiles.
MDAA believes that this position of the Secretary of Defense places the security of the United States from current and future long range ballistic missile threats to the nation and population at a higher risk then it should be after the estimated $13 billion of US tax dollar investment in this system.
The threat from North Korea and Iran remains consistent. The ballistic missile launches from these two countries this year has given them greater understanding and confidence. The countries are proceeding at a steady pace to improve their systems in range, payloads, staging and accuracy. They are making progress and are consistent across the board with previous Department of Defense threat assessments that directed an acceptable risk of interceptors needed for the protection of the United States. Nothing has changed this assessment and calculus to reduce the long range ballistic threat capability to the United States.
Reducing the Shot Doctrine ‘look-shoot-look’: the amount of interceptors that are needed to fire at one incoming missile to assure success, reliability and confidence of the missile defense system. This number has been as high as four or more GBIs to one incoming missile to insure 90 percent plus confidence in a not fully mature system (GBI) that has been initially deployed while still being tested for its capabilities during its deployment. Nothing in the past year with the confidence in the reliability of the GBI system and its testing has shown the need to reduce the shot doctrine from a high number to a low number. A reduced shot doctrine of two shots or less to one long-range ballistic missile has been suggested as a reason to reduce the 44 interceptors to 30 interceptors, thus significantly increasing the risk that assured destruction of a long-range ballistic missile by the GBIs and potential anomalies of that system would be successful.
What amount of risk is the Department of Defense taking against a known enemy by relying on a deterrent value of the long-range ballistic missile system rather than in the systems war fighting capability? In every war game using missile defenses that the current US military war fighters have participated in, every participating US military war fighter has requested more defensive missiles. Iran achieved a successful space launch earlier this year placing a satellite into orbit. North Korea this year has come close to attaining a space launch but failed in its attempt in the third stage. Once these countries gain maturity in the technology and the correct design on long-range ballistic missiles, mass production of these production designs becomes imminent. The U.S. Department of Defense and the intelligence community do not know what those numbers could be and cannot control production of these missiles.
Accidental launch capability against unauthorized long-range ballistic missile launches needs to be factored in the overall calculus for amount of GBIs needed as there are more countries that will have more ballistic missiles and these countries may not have the necessary controls to prevent unauthorized launches.
United States tax dollars have paid approximately $13 billion for the Ground-based Midcourse Defense (GMD) system. The cost of deploying the remaining 14 missiles in silos on missile field at Fort Greely, Alaska is approximately $116 million. It is just 1 percent of the total expenditure to complete the system as designed.
Ellison wants the U.S. Congress to address the full completion of our GMD system to ensure that we reduce the risks to our national security and population. “This is a matter of determining what risk is acceptable and tolerable to our nation by not fully completing the deployment of the ground-based interceptors,” he said. Ellison feels this is a mandate for the United States Congress as the American public continues to show overwhelming support for missile defense and protection of their homeland.
Riki Ellison has a national reputation as an expert on our nation’s missile defense system that he has supported and advocated for more than 25 years. He is available for interviews. Call Mike Terrill at 602 885-1955 to arrange.
SOURCE Missile Defense Advocacy Alliance