Claude Resources Inc. Reports Initial Open Pit Resource at Amisk Gold Project

February 17, 2011

“Indicated Mineral Resource of 921,000 Ounces at 0.95 g/tonne Au Eq and Inferred Mineral Resource of 645,000 Ounces at 0.70 g/tonne Au Eq”

Trading Symbols

SASKATOON, Feb. 17 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ – Claude Resources Inc. (TSX-CRJ; NYSE Amex-CGR) (“Claude”) today provided an independent mineral resource statement
for mineralization amenable to open pit mining  on the 13,600 hectare
Amisk Gold Project in northeastern Saskatchewan, Canada. The Amisk Gold
Project is located 20 kilometres southwest of Flin Flon, Manitoba and
is a 65:35 Joint Venture between Claude and St. Eugene Mining
Corporation (“St. Eugene”); Claude is the operator of the Joint
Venture.  There is potential for expansion of the resource both along
strike and at depth below the conceptual pit bottom. Highlights of the
Amisk Mineral Resource estimate are presented in Table 1.

Table 1: Consolidated Mineral Resource Statement* Amisk Gold Project, Saskatchewan, February 9, 2011. 
Resource Class Quantity

(000′s  tonnes)

Grade (g/tonne) Contained Ounces (000′s)
Au Ag Au Eq Au Ag Au Eq
Indicated   30,150 0.85 6.17 0.95 827 5,978 921
Inferred   28,653 0.64 4.01 0.70 589 3,692 645
Reported at a cut-off of 0.40 grams of gold equivalent (Au Eq) per tonne
using a price of U.S. $1,100 per ounce of gold and U.S. $16 per ounce
of silver inside a conceptual pit shell optimized using metallurgical
and process recovery of eight-seven percent, overall ore mining and
processing costs of U.S.$15 per tonne and overall pit slope of fifty d
egrees.  All figures are rounded to reflect the relative accuracy of the
estimates.  Mineral resources are not mineral reserves and do not have
demonstrated economic viability.

Claude and St. Eugene commissioned SRK Consulting (Canada) Inc. (“SRK”),
to prepare an independent mineral resource evaluation and Technical
Report for the Amisk Gold Project. This mineral resource evaluation is
based on historical drilling completed by Saskatchewan Mining
Development Corporation (“SMDC”) between 1983 and 1989 and Claude
between 1996 and 1998 as well as recent core drill holes drilled by the
Joint Venture during 2010. The entire database comprises 299 drill
holes (53,507 metres), of which 21 (5,657 metres) were drilled by the
Joint Venture in 2010.  Resource evaluation was undertaken in January
on eight domains that comprise the Amisk Gold Deposit. The mineral
resource statement reported herein is the culmination of that work.

Brian Skanderbeg, Claude’s Vice-President Exploration, stated that “The
successful integration of our 2010 exploration with historic drilling
to generate this geological model and open pit resource estimate is the
culmination of an aggressive 12 month exploration program and is a
major milestone for the Amisk Gold Project and Claude Resources.  
Moving forward at Amisk, we will focus on expansion of the open pit
resource, preliminary metallurgical, engineering and economic studies,
as well as an evaluation of the underground potential.  Furthermore,
with the support of a continued strong gold price, strong working
capital, planned initiation of Phase II underground drilling at Madsen
in the first quarter 2011 and improving economics at our Seabee Gold
Project, Claude is well-positioned to capitalize on the current gold
market and execute on its strategy of discovering, developing and
producing gold in established belts proximal to existing

The Amisk Gold Deposit is hosted within a rhyolite flow-dome complex and
overlying pyroclastic tuffs of the Amisk Volcanic Assemblage, Flin Flon
Greenstone Belt. High grade gold and silver mineralization is hosted
within a series of moderately to shallowly-dipping, pyrite +/-
chalcopyrite-sphalerite-tetrahedrite-galena-bearing sulphide vein
systems. High grade vein systems are typically flanked by wide
intervals of low grade disseminated and stringer sulphide
mineralization within a broad sericite alteration envelope. A detailed
plan map and representative cross sections outlining the conceptual
open pit and resource model are presented on Claude’s website (www.clauderesources.com). 

The breakdown of mineral resources for each modeled domain, using a
cut-off grade of 0.4 grams of gold equivalent per tonne for the Amisk
Gold Deposit are outlined in Table 2 below.

Table 2: Mineral Resource Statement Amisk Gold Project, Saskatchewan, February 9, 2011. 


Domain Quantity

(000′s  tonnes)

Grade (g/tonne) Contained Ounces (000′s)
Au Ag Au Eq Au Ag Au Eq
Indicated C Frag LG 18,110 0.80 6.17 0.90 466 3,590 522
  C Frag HG 4,131 1.53 8.80 1.67 203 1,169 223
  SWXX LG 961 0.87 5.09 0.95 27 157 29
  SWXX HG 86 1.74 12.91 1.94 5 36 5
  EVCF 741 0.76 4.83 0.84 18 115 20
  HW 6,121 0.55 4.63 0.62 108 911 122
  Total 30,150 0.85 6.17 0.95 827 5,978 921
Inferred C Frag LG 5,510 0.76 5.60 0.85 135 993 151
  C Frag HG 91 1.63 7.64 1.74 5 22 5
  SWXX LG 2,623 0.71 4.50 0.78 60 380 66
  SWXX HG 211 1.57 10.74 1.74 11 73 12
  E Mafics 17 0.44 5.01 0.52 0.2 3 0.3
  W Mafics 69 0.42 2.89 0.46 1 6 1
  EVCF 3,412 0.68 3.99 0.74 74 438 81
  HW 16,720 0.56 3.31 0.61 303 1,778 330
  Total 28,653 0.64 4.01 0.70 589 3,692 645

Footnotes to the Mineral Resource Statement:

  1. Mineral resources for the Amisk Gold Deposit are reported at a cut-off
    of 0.40 grams of gold equivalent per tonne using a price of U.S. $1,100
    per ounce of gold and U.S. $16 per ounce of silver inside a conceptual
    pit shell optimized using metallurgical and process recovery of
    eight-seven percent, overall ore mining and processing costs of U.S.
    $15 per tonne and overall pit slope of fifty degrees.  All figures are
    rounded to reflect the relative accuracy of the estimates. 

  2. Mineral resources are not mineral reserves and do not have demonstrated
    economic viability.  There is no certainty that all or any part of the
    mineral resource will be converted into mineral reserves.  The resource
    evaluation work was completed by a team of resource geologists under
    the supervision Glen Cole, P.Geo., a full time employee of SRK. Mr.
    Cole has sufficient experience, which is relevant to the style of
    mineralization and type of deposit under consideration and to the
    activities undertaken to qualify as a Qualified Person as defined by
    National Instrument 43-101.

  3. The mineral resources reported herein have been estimated in conformity
    with generally accepted CIM “Estimation of Mineral Resource and Mineral
    Reserves Best Practices” guidelines and are reported in accordance with
    Canadian Securities Administrators’ National Instrument 43-101.

  4. The construction of the Amisk mineral resource model was the product of
    collaboration between Claude and SRK staff. The capture and validation
    of historical exploration data was initiated in January 2010 and
    compiled a digital database containing 299 boreholes (53,507 metres).
    Rigorous quality control and validation procedures, inclusive of twin
    holes and quartering of historic core, were completed by Claude
    Resources. The database also includes recent drilling information on
    the Amisk Gold Deposit to December 31, 2010. SRK audited the procedure
    and visited the site and is of the opinion the data are reliable for
    the purpose of resource estimation.

  5. SRK was engaged in October 2010 to complete an evaluation of mineral
    resources reported herein. Mineral resources were estimated using a
    geostatistical block modeling approach constrained by mineralization
    wireframes. Block size was set at cubes five metres in size.
    Underground excavations were removed from modeled blocks. Block gold
    grade was estimated by ordinary kriging from sourced capped composite
    data. Search neighbourhood and estimation parametres were adjusted
    based on variography results. Two estimation runs were completed and
    grade estimates verified using other estimators. The mineral resource
    model was validated visually on section by section and elevation by
    elevation basis. Quantile-quantile plots comparing resource block and
    capped composite data show the usual smoothing effect of kriging
    particularly at higher grades, but confirm that the block model is
    representative of the informing data.

  6. Analysis of the cumulative probability plots for individual resource
    zones determined that capping of high-grade assays to limit their
    influence during grade estimation was necessary. Probability analysis
    was completed on individual resource domains with capping values
    ranging from 95(th) to 99(th) percentile.

  7. The resource reported herein includes an adjustment to account for
    underground development related to a bulk sample completed by SMDC in

  8. A Technical Report supporting the Mineral Resource Statement will be
    filed on SEDAR (www.sedar.com) within 45 days.

The mineral resources for the Amisk Gold Project are sensitive to the
selection of cut-off grade. Table 3 presents the quantity and grade
estimates at a range of cut-off grades inside the conceptual pit shell
considered for reporting the Mineral Resource Statement. A cut-off
value of 0.4 grams of gold equivalent per tonne was selected based on
optimization results and benchmarking against similar deposits.


Table 3: Global Block Model Quantity and Grade Estimates, Amisk Lake Gold Project at Various cut-off Grades.
Grade Indicated Inferred
Au Eq




Au Eq



Au Eq



Au Eq



Au Eq

0.10 47,496,802 0.70 1,068,940 102,734,810 0.36 1,189,080
0.20 44,036,914 0.75 1,061,865 72,604,675 0.45 1,050,433
0.30 37,422,417 0.83 998,622 45,000,464 0.57 824,675
0.40 30,150,090 0.95 920,881 28,653,135 0.70 644,854
0.50 23,533,117 1.09 824,702 19,446,358 0.82 512,676
0.60 18,322,858 1.25 736,367 13,665,490 0.94 412,994
0.70 14,359,129 1.41 650,936 9,491,034 1.07 326,504
0.80 11,418,785 1.58 580,054 6,659,786 1.20 256,941
0.90 9,206,976 1.76 520,980 4,825,758 1.34 207,903
1.00 7,606,617 1.93 471,998 3,589,543 1.48 170,802
1.50 3,472,946 2.80 312,642 1,078,945 2.16 74,928
Note: The reader is cautioned that the figures in this table should not
be misconstrued with a Mineral Resource Statement. The figures are only
presented to show the sensitivity of the block model estimates to the
selection of cut-off grade.

A team of personnel from Claude and SRK was involved in the preparation
of the Mineral Resource Statement for the Amisk Gold Deposit, including

Brian Skanderbeg (P. Geo.), Philip Ng (P. Eng.), Mike Glover and Kim
of Claude Resources; and Glen Cole (P. Geo.), Sebastien Bernier (P. Geo.) and Goran Andric (P. Eng.) of SRK.  All data considered for
resource evaluation was reviewed by SRK, with Mr. Glen Cole (P. Geo.) a
full time employee of SRK and independent from Claude assuming
professional responsibility. Mr. Cole has reviewed the content of this
News Release.

Brian Skanderbeg, P. Geo., is the Qualified Person for Claude Resources
for the Amisk Gold Project. The Company has implemented a rigorous
Quality Assurance and Quality Control program to ensure best practices
in sampling and analysis of drill core.  Drill core was halved and
samples averaging 1.5 to 2.0 metres were submitted to TSL Laboratories
in Saskatoon, Saskatchewan and/or ALS Chemex in Vancouver, British
, both ISO approved facilities. Quality assurance and quality
control procedures have been implemented including the use of blanks,
standards and duplicates. Core samples were analyzed by a 30 gram gold
fire assay with an atomic absorption, conventional gravimetric and/or
screen fire techniques.

Claude Resources Inc. is a public company based in Saskatoon,
, whose shares trade on the Toronto Stock Exchange
(TSX-CRJ) and the NYSE Amex (NYSE Amex-CGR). Claude is a gold
exploration and mining company with an asset base located entirely in
Canada. Since 1991, Claude has produced approximately 930,000 ounces of
gold from its Seabee mining operation in northeastern Saskatchewan. The
Company also owns 100 percent of the 10,000 acre Madsen property in the
prolific Red Lake gold camp of northwestern Ontario and has a 65
percent working interest in the Amisk Gold Project in northeastern

Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Information

This document contains certain forward-looking statements relating but
not limited to the Company’s expectations, intentions, plans and
beliefs. Forward-looking information can often be identified by
forward-looking words such as “anticipate”, “believe”, “expect”,
“goal”, “plan”, “intent”, “estimate”, “may” and “will” or similar words
suggesting future outcomes or other expectations, beliefs, plans,
objectives, assumptions, intentions or statements about future events
or performance. Forward-looking information may include reserve and
resource estimates, estimates of future production, unit costs, costs
of capital projects and timing of commencement of operations, and is
based on current expectations that involve a number of business risks
and uncertainties. Factors that could cause actual results to differ
materially from any forward-looking statement include, but are not
limited to, failure to establish estimated resources and reserves, the
grade and recovery of mined ore varying from estimates, capital and
operating costs varying significantly from estimates, delays in
obtaining or failures to obtain required governmental, environmental or
other project approvals, inflation, changes in exchange rates,
fluctuations in commodity prices, delays in the development of projects
and other factors. Forward-looking statements are subject to risks,
uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual results to
differ materially from expected results.

Potential shareholders and prospective investors should be aware that
these statements are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties
and other factors that could cause actual results to differ materially
from those suggested by the forward-looking statements. Shareholders
are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking
information. By its nature, forward-looking information involves
numerous assumptions, inherent risks and uncertainties, both general
and specific, that contribute to the possibility that the predictions,
forecasts, projections and various future events will not occur. Claude
Resources undertakes no obligation to update publicly or otherwise
revise any forward-looking information whether as a result of new
information, future events or other such factors which affect this
information, except as required by law.

Cautionary note to U.S. investors concerning resource estimate: The
resource estimates in this document were prepared in accordance with
National Instrument 43-101, adopted by the Canadian Securities
Administrators. The requirements of National Instrument 43-101 differ
significantly from the requirements of the United States Securities and
Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). In this document, we use the terms
“measured”, “indicated” and “inferred” resources. Although these terms
are recognized and required in Canada, the SEC does not recognize them.
The SEC permits U.S. mining companies, in their filings with the SEC,
to disclose only those mineral deposits that constitute “reserves”.
Under United States standards, mineralization may not be classified as
a reserve unless the determination has been made that the
mineralization could be economically and legally extracted at the time
the determination is made. United States investors should not assume
that all or any portion of a measured or indicated resource will ever
be converted into “reserves”. Further, “inferred resources” have a
great amount of uncertainty as to their existence and whether they can
be mined economically or legally, and United States investors should
not assume that “inferred resources” exist or can be legally or
economically mined, or that they will ever be upgraded to a higher


Source: newswire

comments powered by Disqus