Kodiak Oil & Gas Corp. Announces Year-End 2010 Proved Reserves and Production and Sales Volumes
DENVER, Feb. 23, 2011 /PRNewswire/ — Kodiak Oil & Gas Corp. (NYSE Amex: KOG), an oil and gas exploration and production company with assets in the Williston Basin of North Dakota and Montana and in the Green River Basin of southwest Wyoming and Colorado, today announced record year-end 2010 proved reserves quantities and reported record production and sales volumes for the quarter and year ended December 31, 2010.
Kodiak’s estimated total proved reserves at December 31, 2010 were approximately 11.5 million barrels of oil equivalent (MMBoe), as compared to 4.5 MMBoe at December 31, 2009. The 2010 total represents a 158% increase from 2009′s estimated proved reserves on an equivalent basis, and is comprised of 10.0 million barrels of crude oil and 9.0 billion cubic feet (Bcf) of natural gas. The 2010 reserve mix is 87% crude oil and 13% natural gas, as compared to 86% crude oil and 14% natural gas for 2009. Approximately 37% of the 2010 total proved reserves are categorized as proved developed producing and approximately 62% are classified as proved undeveloped, as compared to 32% proved developed producing and 68% proved undeveloped for 2009.
For 2010 reserve quantities, Kodiak’s estimated future cash flows, discounted at an annual rate of 10 percent before giving effect to income taxes (commonly known as PV-10 value), for proved reserves at year-end was $161.1 million, as compared to $39.1 million in 2009, a 312% increase. Please see below for further disclosure regarding the PV-10 value and the Company’s belief in its usefulness in evaluating its reserves. Approximately $109.1 million of the PV-10 value is attributed to the proved developed producing reserves. The Williston Basin constitutes approximately 99% of Kodiak’s proved reserves.
When booking proved undeveloped locations, Kodiak considered its 2011-2012 drilling program and the sources and amounts of capital available to complete the program. All of the wells to be drilled in the middle Bakken Formation in the upcoming drilling program were classified as proved undeveloped as of December 31, 2010. As the wells are successfully drilled and completed, they will be converted to proved developed producing reserves during 2011. Given the short production history, as of December 31, 2010, from Kodiak’s operated wells drilled in the Three Forks Formation, the Company has booked only limited proved reserves from that formation. As more production data is obtained from the Three Forks Formation, Kodiak anticipates booking additional reserves in 2011.
As of year-end 2009, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) instituted certain guidelines which limit proved undeveloped reserves to those expected to be developed within five years. By comparison, Kodiak booked its 2010 proved undeveloped reserves based on only a two-year development program, a methodology consistent with the Company’s previous two years’ proved undeveloped reserves bookings. The Company’s 2010 reserve estimates do not include any probable or possible reserves which may exist for Kodiak’s properties.
Kodiak Oil & Gas Corp. Proved Reserves Summary at December 31, 2010
Reserve Category % of Oil Gas
Reserves (MBbls) (MMcf)
Proved Developed Producing 37% 3,667 3,622
Proved Developed Non-
Producing 1% 89 31
Proved Undeveloped 62% 6,254 5,307
----- -----
Total Proved 100% 10,010 8,960
Reserve Category 2010 2009 %
MBOE MBOE Change
Proved Developed Producing 4,271 1,413 202%
Proved Developed Non-
Producing 94 -- NM
Proved Undeveloped 7,138 3,045 134%
----- ----- ---
Total Proved 11,504 4,458 158%
Price deck: $79.40 per Bbl (WTI) and $4.26 per MMBtu (HH)
---------------------------------------------------------
Totals may not add due to rounding
Oil Gas Equivalents
Reserve Reconciliation MBbl MMcf MBOE
Beginning Balance, (12/31/09) 3,817 3,848 4,458
Revisions of previous estimates 394 (203) 360
Extensions /discoveries /
additions 3,173 2,571 3,601
Purchases of reserves in place 3,071 2,906 3,555
Sales of reserves in place -- -- --
Sales volumes (unaudited) (444) (162) (471)
Balance, December 31, 2010 10,010 8,960 11,504
-------------------------- ------ ----- ------
Totals may not add due to rounding
During 2010, Kodiak invested approximately $66 million in capital expenditures allocated to drilling and completing new wells and approximately $130 million in leasehold acquisitions of producing properties and undeveloped leasehold. Approximately 1,374% of 2010′s sales volumes of 471 MBOE were replaced from all sources.
Kodiak’s proved reserves at December 31, 2010 were computed using the SEC guidelines that went into effect for the reporting of year-end 2009 proved reserves. Commodity prices used in calculating the economic quantities of reserves are based on the average of the first-day-of-the-month price during the 12-month period ending December 31, 2010. For oil volumes, the average West Texas Intermediate spot price of $79.40 per barrel is adjusted by lease for quality, transportation fees and local price differentials. For Montana and North Dakota natural gas volumes, the average Northern Natural (Ventura) spot price of $4.39 per million British thermal units (MMBtu) is adjusted by lease for energy content, transportation fees and local price differentials. For Colorado and Wyoming natural gas volumes, the average Questar Rocky Mountains spot price of $3.92 per MMBtu is adjusted by lease for energy content, transportation fees and local price differentials. All prices are held constant throughout the lives of the properties. By comparison, average year-end prices used to determine reserves were $57.65 per barrel of oil and $3.87 per MMBtu of natural gas for 2009.
Reserve estimates for 2010, 2009 and 2008 were prepared by Kodiak’s independent reservoir engineering consultant, Netherland, Sewell & Associates, Inc. and conform to the definition as set forth in the SEC Regulation S-X Part 210.4-10 (a) as clarified by subsequent SEC Staff Accounting bulletins. The proved reserves are also in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Codification Topic 932, Extractive Activities – Oil and Gas.
Annual and Fourth Quarter 2010 Production and Sales Volumes
The Company also disclosed production and sales volumes for the quarter and year-ended December 31, 2010. Management believes it is important to differentiate between production and sales volumes which are provided in the table below. The most significant factor attributed to the difference is the accounting treatment of production acquired in the transaction that closed in the fourth quarter 2010. As part of the terms of the closing, a portion of the production was treated as a one-time purchase price adjustment rather than as oil and gas sales. Further differences are noted because Kodiak flares the majority of its natural gas volumes in the Williston Basin as it awaits ongoing pipeline connection.
The Company intends to provide an operations update to discuss activities subsequent to the end of the fourth quarter 2010 as part of its fourth quarter and full-year 2010 results news release which is scheduled for dissemination after the close of trading on Thursday, March 3, 2011.
Kodiak Oil & Gas Corp. Net Production and Sales Comparison
----------------------------------------------------------
Quarter-over-Quarter Comparison
Three Months Ended
Dec.
31, Sept 30, Dec. 31,
Production Volumes* 2010 2010 2009
-------------------
Natural Gas (Mcf) 179,467 157,872 82,649
Oil (Bbls) 169,176 150,234 71,092
Barrels of Oil
Equivalent (BOE) 199,087 176,546 84,867
------- ------- ------
Daily Production
(BOE/day) 2,164 1,919 922
Product Sales
Volumes
-------------
Natural Gas (Mcf) 31,707 37,342 13,901
Oil (Bbls) 158,764 120,544 69,637
Barrels of Oil
Equivalent (BOE) 164,049 126,768 71,954
------- ------- ------
Daily Sales (BOE/
day) 1,783 1,378 782
Product Price
Received
-------------
Natural Gas ($/Mcf) $5.82 $4.47 $6.05
Crude Oil ($/Bbl) $73.63 $66.07 $67.39
Quarter-over-Quarter Comparison
-------------------------------
% Change
--------
Sequential Year over
Production Volumes* Quarter Year
------------------- ----------- ----------
Natural Gas (Mcf) 14% 117%
------------------- --- ---
Oil (Bbls) 13% 138%
----------- --- ---
Barrels of Oil
Equivalent (BOE) 13% 135%
----------------- --- ---
Daily Production
(BOE/day)
----------------
Product Sales
Volumes
-------------
Natural Gas (Mcf) -15% 128%
----------------- --- ---
Oil (Bbls) 32% 128%
----------- --- ---
Barrels of Oil
Equivalent (BOE) 29% 128%
----------------- --- ---
Daily Sales (BOE/
day)
-----------------
Product Price
Received
-------------
Natural Gas ($/Mcf) 30% -4%
------------------- --- ---
Crude Oil ($/Bbl) 11% 9%
----------------- --- ---
Year-over-Year Comparison
Twelve Months
Ended % Change
Dec.
31, Dec 31, Year over
Production Volumes* 2010 2009 Year
-------------------
Natural Gas (Mcf) 522,538 303,115 72%
Oil (Bbls) 485,434 184,231 163%
Barrels of Oil
Equivalent (BOE) 572,523 234,750 144%
------- -------
Daily Production
(BOE/day) 1,569 643
Product Sales
Volumes
-------------
Natural Gas (Mcf) 162,931 220,455 -26%
Oil (Bbls) 443,716 182,558 143%
Barrels of Oil
Equivalent (BOE) 470,871 219,301 115%
------- -------
Daily Sales (BOE/
day) 1,290 601
Product Price
Received
-------------
Natural Gas ($/Mcf) $4.81 $2.84 69%
Crude Oil ($/Bbl) $70.01 $58.35 20%
*Production includes flared natural gas and production from acquired
properties after the transaction's effective date of August 1, 2010.
The Bakken play generated 95% of KOG's total oil volumes and 87% of
its equivalent volumes in Q410.
Definition of PV-10 Value and the Standardized Measure
PV-10 is the estimated future net cash flows from proved reserves, discounted at an annual rate of 10 percent before giving effect to income taxes. Standardized Measure is the after-tax estimated future cash flows from proved reserves, discounted at an annual rate of 10 percent, determined in accordance with GAAP. Kodiak uses PV-10 as one measure of the value of the Company’s proved reserves, and to compare relative values of proved reserves among exploration and production companies without regard to income taxes. Kodiak believes that securities analysts and investors use PV-10 in similar ways. Kodiak further believes PV-10 is a useful measure for comparison of proved reserve values among companies because, unlike Standardized Measure, it excludes future income taxes that often depend principally on the characteristics of the owner reserves rather than on the nature, location and quality of the reserves themselves. Below is a reconciliation of PV-10 to Standardized Measure:
SEC Pricing (000s)
PV-10 at 12/31/10 $161,128
Discounted Effect of Income
Taxes $(7,770)
-------
Standardized Measure at
12/31/10 $153,358
About Kodiak Oil & Gas Corp.
Denver-based Kodiak Oil & Gas Corp. is an independent energy exploration and development company focused on exploring, developing and producing oil and natural gas in the Williston and Green River Basins in the U.S. Rocky Mountains. For further information, please visit www.kodiakog.com. The Company’s common shares are listed for trading on the NYSE Amex exchange under the symbol: “KOG.”
Forward-Looking Statements
This press release includes statements that may constitute “forward-looking” statements, usually containing the words “believe,” “estimate,” “project,” “expect” or similar expressions. These statements are made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements inherently involve risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements. Forward looking statements are statements that are not historical facts and are generally, but not always, identified by the words “expects,” “plans,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “intends,” “estimates,” projects,” “potential” and similar expressions, or that events or conditions “will,” “would,” “may,” “could” or “should” occur. Forward-looking statements in this document include statements regarding the Company’s expectations of future performance, including production, production interruptions and sales, the Company’s reserve estimates and its expectations regarding growth in its estimated reserves, the Company’s expectation regarding the connection of its wells to pipelines, and the Company’s expectations regarding the timing and success of its exploration and development plans. Factors that could cause or contribute to such differences include, but are not limited to, fluctuations in the prices of oil and gas, uncertainties inherent in estimating quantities of oil and gas reserves and projecting future rates of production and timing of development activities, competition, operating risks, acquisition risks, liquidity and capital requirements, the effects of governmental regulation, adverse changes in the market for the Company’s oil and gas production, dependence upon third-party vendors, and other risks detailed in the Company’s periodic report filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
SOURCE Kodiak Oil & Gas Corp.