November 29, 2006
Next to This Fish, Sharks Are Great White Wimps
By Jeremy Manier, Chicago Tribune
Nov. 29--A fearsome mega-predator of the ancient seas had the most powerful jaws of any fish that ever lived, according to a new study that makes even the biggest great white shark seem like a slack-jawed weakling.
The fish in the new study, Dunkleosteus terrelli, was a toothless killer with bladelike jaws and a huge, armored head. Experts believe it grew up to 30 feet long and weighed as much as 4 tons--bigger than most modern sharks, and about the size of a killer whale.
But the animal's jaws would have set it apart from any latter-day seagoing carnivores.
Using fossil remains to build a computer model of the fish's bones and muscles, the Chicago researchers found that it could tear apart its food with a force of 1,100 pounds per square inch.
The fish needed that strength to pierce the bony armor that many sea creatures of that era possessed. Only alligators and Tyrannosaurus rex have had more powerful jaws, experts believe.
"This thing was capable of biting anything it came across in half," said study co-author Mark Westneat, associate curator of zoology, fish evolution and biomechanics at the Field Museum.
The work sets a new standard in its analysis of how a long-extinct species moved and ate its food, said Adam Summers, a professor of ecology and evolutionary biology at the University of California at Irvine.
Biologists in the past have used biomechanics to study how dinosaurs ran or consumed their prey. Summers said the new report, published in Wednesday's issue of the scientific journal Biology Letters, uses an innovative way of drawing on data taken from modern fish to determine how an extinct ocean predator used its jaws.
"We now have an idea of just how hard a fossil critter can bite," Summers said.
First fossil found in 1867
Scientists have been fascinated by Dunkleosteus since Ohio geologist Jay Terrell discovered the first fossil specimens in 1867.
To help calculate the ancient fish's biting power, the scientists spent a day fitting packing foam inside the jaws of a fossil replica at the Field Museum. That gave them a good estimate of how burly the animal's jaw muscles were.
U. of C. graduate student Philip Anderson also took extensive measurements of six Dunkleosteus skulls at the Cleveland Museum of Natural History. In addition to showing how the fish's joints fit together, the fossils bear scars where jaw muscles connected with the bone.
Westneat already had a computer model showing how such attributes affect the power and motion of jaws in modern fish. He plugged the fossil's measurements into that model to simulate how the extinct fish's jaws worked.
The comparison with living species shows that Dunkleosteus was unlike any living fish.
"We don't really have an animal that fills this kind of niche--a massively armored predator that bites that hard," said Summers.
In addition to having extremely strong jaws, researchers think the monstrous fish could move its jaws very quickly, creating a suction that drew smaller prey into its mouth.
Built for armored prey
Biologists say the predator may have used its strong jaws to hunt armored animals such as the ammonoids, an extinct species with a hard shell related to the octopus and squid. The fish's imposing jaws and the tough shells of its prey may have evolved in tandem, in what biologists describe as an evolutionary "arms race."
"These guys were probably the first marine predators to be able to bite food into pieces for swallowing," Westneat said. "Other predators were swallowing their prey whole."
Sharks later developed shearing teeth to tear prey apart, but that did not happen for another 100 million years after Dunkleosteus ruled the seas.
In fact, researchers believe Dunkleosteus was one of the first vertebrates that could be called an "apex predator," meaning that it had no natural enemies.Yet by about 360 million years ago the sea monster had died out, part of the mysterious mass extinction that marked the end of what biologists call the Devonian period. Many armored fish of that epoch died off, though no one really knows why.
"The Devonian extinction is not nearly as well understood as some other extinction events," Anderson said. "Dunkleosteus had thick armor on its skull and no armor behind, so it would have been very front-heavy."
Even if it was flawed, the mighty fish still sparks the imagination of some biologists.
"It would have been an awe-inspiring predator," Summers said. "We have nothing like that anymore."
Copyright (c) 2006, Chicago Tribune
Distributed by McClatchy-Tribune Business News.
For reprints, email [email protected], call 800-374-7985 or 847-635-6550, send a fax to 847-635-6968, or write to The Permissions Group Inc., 1247 Milwaukee Ave., Suite 303, Glenview, IL 60025, USA.