Quantcast

Effects of DATEM on Dough Rheological Characteristics and Qualities of CSB and Bread

May 4, 2007

By Xiujin, Zhang; Jinquan, Sun; Zaigui, Li

ABSTRACT

Diacetyl tartaric acid ester of monoglycerides (DATEM) is a kind of anionic emulsifier. To date, the positive effect of DATEM on the volume of bread has been reported, but the effects on Chinese steamed bread (CSB) quality and other parameters for bread quality are still unclear. The effects of DATEM on the characteristics of dough and the qualities of CSB and bread were investigated. The results showed that, the effects of DATEM on the rheological properties of dough were complex. Water absorption ratio of CSB dough decreased slightly, while that of bread dough increased slightly. But gas retention and structure improved and gluten strength increased for both CSB and bread doughs after DATEM was added. The studies also showed that structure, elasticity, tenacity, and whiteness of CSB were improved, but specific volume was almost unchanged. The structure, color, and smoothness were significantly improved for bread, and specific volume increased compared with the control. The optimal quantities of DATEM for CSB and bread were both [asymptotically =]0.10% (on flour mass basis).

Cereal Chem. 84(2):181-185

Diacetyl tartaric acid ester of monoglycerides (DATEM) is an anionic oil-in-water emulsifier (Inoue et al 1995; Ribotta et al 2004); the molecular formula is CH^sub 2^O = OCHOCOCH^sub 3^CHOCO CH^sub 3^CoeH-CHOH-CH^sub 2^OCO(CH2)^sub 16^CH^sub 3^. The hydrophile-lipopnile balance (HLB) value of DATEM is [asymptotically =]80 -10. Acceptable daily intake is [asymptotically =]00 -50 mg/ kg. Lethal dose 50% (LD^sub 50^) for DATEM is 10 g/kg of body weight, respectively. DATEM is often used to increase the volume of bread and has been reported as an effective bread emulsifier in many countries (Yang 1994; Kokelaar et al 1995; Jin et al 1996; Stampfli et al 1996).

DATEM can enhance the resistance of dough to collapse and improve gas retention of dough, so it is also a dough strengthener (Inoue et al 1995; Ribotta et al 2004). Commercial DATEM is a mixture of several components including DATEM, monoacetyl tartaric acid ester of monoglycerides, acetic acid, esterification products of tartaric acid, and acetic acid. The influence of DATEM on dough quality varies with the components of DATEM (Kohler 200Ia). If DATEM contains hydrophilic radicals such as diacetyl radical and hydroxyl, they will interact with large amounts of water, which is favorable for the water retention of dough (Frank and Smith 1998). As a result, the aging speed of bread is reduced. DATEM components with two carboxyl groups had the lowest baking activity but they were most active in dough and gluten rheology (Kohler 200Ib). In addition, DATEM can strongly interact with proteins, especially glutenin, thus gas retention of dough is improved and the formation of a gluten-starch-fat network structure is accelerated (Zhang 1993b; Stampfli et al 1996).

Although it is widely used in processing CSB and bread, there are few reports on the effects of DATEM on qualities of CSB and bread except for the positive effect of DATEM on bread volume. This investigation compared the effects of DATEM on dough Theological properties and on CSB and bread qualities.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Materials

Shenxiang is a special first-grade flour (moisture content 13.36%; wet gluten content 28%; gluten index 64.5%; falling number 481 sec) obtained from the Zhengzhou Haijia flour mill in China. The Jinyuan bread flour (moisture content 14.1%; wet gluten content 32%; gluten index 92.3%; falling number 446 sec) was obtained from the Zhengzhou Jinyuan flour mill in China. DATEM was procured from Henan Zhengtong Chemicals in China. Instant active dry yeast used in the preparation of CSB and bread was provided by Meishan Mauri Yeast Company in China.

Flour Quality Tests

Moisture content was determined by Approved Method 44-16 (AACC International 2000). Wet gluten content and gluten index were determined according to Approved Method 38-12. Falling number was obtained according to Approved Method 56-8IB.

CSB Preparation (SBIT 10139-1993)

All ingredients for CSB were accurately weighed: 100 g of flour, l g of instant active dry yeast, 48 g of water, and varying quantities of DATEM. The ingredients were put into an aluminum basin in order and mixed by hand until optimum dough consistency was obtained. After resting for 15 min at room temperature, the dough was molded into a hemisphere-like shape (6.0 cm height) on a smooth surface. After proofing for [asymptotically =]30 min in an incubator at 30C and 70% relative humidity (RH), the shaped dough was put into a steamer with boiling water and steamed for 20 min. Procedures followed PRC, Bureau of Technical Supervision, National Standard SB/ T 10139-1993.

Quality Evaluation of CSB (GB/T 17320-1998)

After cooling to room temperature, CSB weight was measured with a DS-671 electronic scale. Volume of CSB was determined by rapeseed displacement. The specific volume was calculated as specific volume = volume/weight. Height (H) and diameter (D) of CSB was measured with a ruler and the H/D ratio was calculated as H/D ratio = height/ diameter. Scores for CSB quality parameters were specific volume (0- 15), H/D (0-5), skin color (0-10), skin structure (0-10), appearance shape (0-10), inner structure (0-15), elasticity (0-10), tenacity (0- 10), viscosity (0-10), savor (0-5), total score was 100 points. The panel included five professional teachers and five students who knew CSB well. The ages of the 10 participants (two men and eight women) ranged from 23 to 40. Nine samples, including a standard sample, were evaluated each day. Assessments were made in triplicate. Procedures followed PRC, Bureau of Technical Supervision, National Standard GB/T 17320-1998.

Preparation of Bread Sample (GB/T 14611-1993)

Dough made from flour with variable amounts of DATEM (500 g), instant active dry yeast (8 g), salt (5 g), sugar (100 g), shortening (40 g), and water (270 g) was made in a flour mixing machine. DATEM was sifted with the flour to ensure a uniform distribution throughout the dough. Salt and sugar were dissolved in water first. After mixing, the dough was immediately taken out and rested for 10 min at room temperature, then the dough was divided and shaped into several round pieces and let stand for another 10 min. After standing, the dough pieces were shaped to loaves and then proofed for [asymptotically =]90 min in an incubator at 39C and 80% RH. The shaped and proofed dough pieces were baked in an oven at 150C (above) and 210C (below) for 25 min. Procedures followed PRC, Ministry of Commerce, Bureau of Technical Supervision, National Business Standard GB/T 14611-1993.

Quality Evaluation of Bread (GB/T 14611-1993)

Specific volume of bread was determined as for CSB. After cooling to room temperature, breads were randomized and evaluated by five highly trained assessors for specific volume (0-35), skin color (0- 5), skin texture (0-5), crumb color (0-5), smoothness (0-10), crumb structure (0-25), elasticity (0-10), and mouthfeel (0-5). Procedures were PRC, Bureau of Technical Supervision, National Standard GB/T 14611-1993. Duplicate assessments were made.

Rheological Properties

Farinograph and extensigraph tests were performed according to Approved Methods 54-21 and 54-10, respectively (AACC International 2000). Detection of dough rheological properties was made in duplicate.

TABLE I

Effects of DATEM Addition on CSB Quality*

TABLE II

Effects of DATEM Addition on Farinograph Properties of CSB Dough(a)

Experimental Design

To investigate the effects of DATEM on the qualities of CSB and bread, seven levels of DATEM (0.03, 0.05, 0.08, 0.10, 0.20, 0.50, and 1.00%) were used to make CSB and five levels of DATEM (0.05, 0.07, 0.10, 0.40, and 0.60%) were used to make bread. In addition, DATEM was used at three (0.03, 0.08, and 0.10%) and four levels (0.03, 0.05, 0.08, and 0.10%) for investigating the effects of DATEM on the rheological properties of CSB and bread dough.

Statistical Analysis

Each treatment was prepared randomly on different days in at least two replicates. Statistical analysis of the data was performed using SAS statistical software. One-way ANOVA was used to analyze the data to ascertain whether the quantities of DATEM significantly affected qualities of CSB and bread or the dough rheological properties. Significance level was α = 0.05.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Effects of DATEM on CSB Quality

The quality of CSB varies with the DATEM addition as shown in Table I. It indicated that, except for specific volume, H/D, appearance shape, elasticity, and savor, DATEM significantly affected almost all of the CSB characteristics. Tenacity of CSB increased but viscosity decreased (therefore the scores increased) with the addition. The most important aspects (skin color, skin structure, inner structure, and total score) cleary varied with the variation of DATEM addition. These results are probably due to the reactions of DATEM and fat, protein, and carbohydrate molecules in dough which stabilize and strengthen the gluten structure (Tang 2001).

With the increase of DATEM addition, skin color, skin structure, inner structure, and total score of CSB significantly improved initially, but if the quantity was >0.10%, these scores decreased slightly. Therefore, the optimal quantity of DATEM added in CSB was 0.10%. This is probably because, with the increase o\f DATEM, the emulsification effect is enhanced gradually, but when the addition is >0.10%, the emulsification effect of DATEM cannot be enhanced any further (Zhang 1993a). Compared with the control, the CSB with 0.10% DATEM had smaller specific volume but the inner structure significantly improved with even air holes and scores of color, tenacity, and viscosity significantly increased.

Effects of DATEM on CSB Dough Properties

The sensory analysis results showed that the optimal quantity of DATEM was at the 0.10% level. To verify the results above, three dough samples with different levels of DATEM (0.03, 0.08, and 0.10%) were selected and their Theological properties were determined. The effects of DATEM on farinograph and extensigraph properties of CSB dough are shown in Tables II and III

Table II shows that the effects of DATEM on farinograph properties are complex. As the DATEM level increased, development time was prolonged. Water absorption ratio decreased slightly. Stability time was almost unchanged when DATEM levels were

TABLE III

Effects of DATEM Addition on Extensigraph Properties of CSB Dough(a)

TABLE IV

Effects of DATEM Addition on Bread Quality(a)

Compared with the control, extensiveness and powdered strength decreased, however extended resistance decreased at first and then increased, while extended ratio changed little.

Tables II and III lead us to conclude that the gas retention and structure of CSB dough improved, while gluten strength increased after DATEM was added. The effects of DATEM on the rheological properties of dough were complex, so attention should be paid to the quantity of DATEM used in making CSB.

As a surfactant, DATEM can attach to the surface of starch particles and form an indissolvable film, so the water absorption ratio of dough will decrease. However, the effect of DATEM on water absorption ratio was quite weak (Toufeili et al 1995), which is in accordance with the trial results above. DATEM can react with fat, protein, and carbohydrate molecules in dough, thus stablizing and strengthening the gluten structure. DATEM can also react with amino acids and form hydrogen bonds, which leads to the strengthening of the gluten network structure and, consequently, improves gas retention of gluten (Tang 2001). Owing to the existence of diacetyl residues, anion residues in DATEM can effectively neutralize the cation residues in gluten and thereby reduce the charge quantity of gluten, which favors gluten conglomeration and, improves the strength and gas retention of gluten (Kohler 200Ic). The results also showed that DATEM addition is especially suitable for the European and Asian wheat flours with low protein content and weak gluten strength (Jin et al 1996).

Effects of DATEM on Bread Quality

The effects of DATEM on bread quality are shown in Table IV. DATEM significantly affected bread quality. Adding DATEM improved the overall quality of bread compared with the control. Specific volume and crumb structure were significantly affected with the increase of DATEM, which is in line with the reports on DATEM functionality (Stampfli and Nerden 1995). The largest specific volume and optimum crumb structure were obtained in the presence of 0.10% DATEM. When DATEM addition was at 0.05%, bread color, including skin color and crumb color, skin texture, smoothness, and mouthfeel improved, but as DATEM was increased further, skin color, skin texture, and mouthfeel showed no further improvement, while crumb color and smoothness of bread improved continuously. When DATEM was >0.10%, crumb color was relatively inferior but was still superior to that of the control, while the elasticity of bread was unchanged. As a whole, the optimum quantity of DATEM for making bread was 0.10%. The mechanism of the effects of DATEM on the quality of bread dough was almost the same as that on CSB dough, except for the volume.

TABLE V

Effect of DATEM on Farinograph Properties of Bread Dough(a)

TABLE VI

Effect of DATEM on Extensigraph Properties of Bread Dough(a)

Effects of DATEM on Properties of Bread Dough

The sensory analysis of bread showed that the optimal quantity of DATEM was at the 0.10% level. Similar to the evaluation of CSB dough quality, four bread dough samples with different DATEM additions (0.03, 0.05, 0.08, and 0.10%) were selected. Rheological properties were determined to verify the theoretical results above. The effects of DATEM on farinograph and extensigraph properties of bread dough are given in Tables V and VI.

It is clearly understood that DATEM significantly affected stability time, softening degree, and evaluation value overall, except for water absorption ratio and development time (Table V). When the addition was 0.03%, stability time, and evaluation value obviously increased, while softening degree decreased.

The effects of DATEM on extensigraph properties of bread dough are very complex (Table VI). Extensibility and powdered strength decreased, but extended resistance and extended ratio initially decreased and then increased.

Tables V and VI showed that adding DATEM had a significant effect on rheological properties of bread dough, so attention should also be paid to the quantity of DATEM during breadmaking.

The mechanism of the effects of DATEM on the rheological properties of bread dough is almost the same as that on CSB dough. Farvili et al (1997) reported that the effects of emulsifier on flours with different protein contents were varied.

Emulsifiers had a significant effect on flour with medium protein, so differences in specific volume and development time for CSB and bread dough with DATEM are possibly due to wet gluten contents or gluten index of the flours used. Development time was almost unchanged and stability time increased, which is not in accord with a former study that showed development and stability time changed little after DATEM was added (Stampfli et al 1996).

CONCLUSIONS

Through sensory evaluation and measurements of dough properties, the optimal quantities of DATEM for both CSB and bread were at the 0.10% level. However, the effects of DATEM on specific volume and development time of CSB and bread dough were different. Specific volume of CSB decreased slightly, while specific volume of bread increased. Development time of CSB dough was prolonged, while the effect for bread was not as obvious. The differences are possibly due to the different wet gluten contents or gluten index of the flours used (Farvili et al 1997) and this requires further research.

LITERATURE CITED

AACC International. 2000. Approved Methods of the American Association of Cereal Chemists, 10th Ed. Methods 38-12, 44-16, 54- 10, 5421, and 56-8IB. The Association: St. Paul, MN.

Farvili, N., Walker, C. E., and Qarooni, J. 1997. The effects of protein content of flour and emulsifiers on tanoor bread quality. J. Cereal Sci. 26:141-142.

Frank, D. C., and Smith, P. M. 1998. Effects of selected emusifiers, enzymes and a carbohydrate-based fat substitute on physical and sensory characteristics in a low-fat muffin. Int. J. Consumer Studies 22:94.

Inoue, Y., Sapirstein, H., and Bushuk, W. 1995. Studies on frozen doughs. IV. Effect of shortening systems on baking and Theological properties. Cereal Chem. 72:221-226.

Jin, G. M., Sun, W., and Yang, Y. L. 1996. Development of diacetyl tartaric acid ester of monoglycerides. J. Wuxi University of Light Industry 15:308.

Kohler, P. 200 Ia. Study of the effect of DATEM. 4. Optimization of DATEM Synthesis. Lebensm. Wiss. Technol. 24:367-368.

Kohler, P. 200 Ib. Study of the effect of DATEM. 2. Synthesis and Characterization of DATEM components. Lebensm. Wiss. Technol. 34:359366.

Kohler, P. 2001c. Study of the effect of DATEM. 3. Synthesis and Characterization of DATEM Components. Lebensm. Wiss. Technol. 34:365.

Kokelaar, J. J., Garritsen, J. A., and Prins, A. 1995. Surface Theological properties of sodium stearoyl-2-lactylate (SSL) and diacetyl tartaric esters of mono (and di) glyceride (DATEM) surfactants after a mechanical surface treatment in relation to their bread improving abilities. Colloids and Surfaces A. Physicochem. Eng. Aspects 95:69.

Ribotta, P. D., Ferez, G. T., Leona, A. E., and Anon, M. C. 2004. Effect of emulsifier and guar gum on micro structural, rheological and baking performance of frozen bread dough. Food Hydrocolloids 18:305.

Stampfli, L., and Nerden, B. 1995. Emulsifiers in bread making. Food Chem. 52:353-360.

Stampfli, L., Nersted, B., and Molteberg, E. L. 1996. Effects of emulsifiers on farinograph and extensograph measurements. Food Chem. 57:523-527.

Tang, J. J. 2001. Multiple products made from high quality baking food ingredients. CFI 8:26.

Toufeili, L, Shadarevian, S., Miski, A. M. A., and Hani, I. 1995. Effect of shortening and surfactants on selected chemical physicochemical parameters and sensory quality of Arabic bread. Food Chem. 53:253-257.

Yang, Y. L. 1994. Application of food emulsifier DATEM in bread. Grain Storage Science and Technology Message 5:36.

Zhang, W. F. 1993a. Basic theories of food emulsifier. Page 21 in: Food Emulsifier. China Light Industry Press: Beijing.

Zhang, W. F. 1993b. Production, composition and characteristics of food emulsifier. Pages 168-176 in: Food Emulsifier. China Light Industry Press: Beijing.

[Received August 2, 2006. Accepted December 12, 2006.]

Zhang Xiujin,’ Sun Jinquan,2 and Li Zaigui1,3

1 Laboratory of Cereal Science, College of Food Science and Nutritional Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing, P. R. China, 100083.

2 Laboratory of Food Additive, Grain and Food College, Henan University of Technology, Zhengzhou, P. R. China, 450052.\3 Corresponding author. Phone: +8610 6273 7392. Fax: +8610 6273 7392. E-mail: lizg@cau.edu.cn

doi:10.1094/CCHEM-84-2-0181

O 2007 AACC International, Inc.

Copyright American Association of Cereal Chemists Mar/Apr 2007

(c) 2007 Cereal Chemistry. Provided by ProQuest Information and Learning. All rights Reserved.




comments powered by Disqus