Teachers Influence Student Views Of Evolution & Creationism
Posted on: Sunday, 3 May 2009, 08:50 CDT
College students' views about evolution and creationism are often shaped by what they learned in their high school biology classes, according to a University of Minnesota study published in the May issue of BioScience, the journal of the American Institute of Biological Sciences.
Co-authors Randy Moore and Sehoya Cotner, professors in the College of Biological Sciences, surveyed 1,000 students taking introductory biology classes at the University of Minnesota to learn how biology majors view evolution compared to non-majors. Results showed that the two groups' views were similar and revealed that high school biology teachers influence whether majors and non-majors college students accept evolution or question it based on creationism.
About two thirds of students from both groups said their high school biology class included evolution and not creationism. Only 1 to 2 percent of classes covered creationism and not evolution. And 6 to 13 percent of classes did not cover either evolution or creationism. But 29 percent of majors and 21 percent of non-majors said their high school biology class covered both evolution and creationism.
Students whose high school biology class included creationism (with or without evolution) were more likely to accept creationist views as entering college students. Similarly, students exposed to evolutionism but not creationism were more likely to accept evolution in college. For example, 72 to 78 percent of students exposed to evolution only agreed that it is scientifically valid while 57 to 59 percent of students who were exposed to creationism agreed that it can be validated.
"I've long known that many biology teachers teach creationism, but was surprised to learn they have such a strong impact," said Randy Moore, professor of biology and lead author. "It's unfortunate that so many teachers think their religious beliefs are science. Teachers who don't teach evolution deny students the understanding of one of the greatest principles in history."
"I was shocked that there weren't bigger differences between majors and non-majors," said Sehoya Cotner, associate professor of biology. "Evolution is the foundation of the entire discipline. It leads me to believe that these students are probably interested in biology for reasons besides gaining a full understanding and appreciation of the science."
The article included a review of previous studies that explain why so many high school biology teachers endorse creationism. The studies say that more than 25 percent of biology teachers do not know it is unconstitutional to teach creationism. One third didn't major in biology in college and never studied evolution. One fourth believe that creationism can be proven scientifically. Administrators, parents or colleagues may pressure them. There are usually no consequences for teachers who do not cover evolution or who teach creationism.
The authors are interested in working with high school biology teachers -- and particularly with college students who plan to teach biology -- to improve their understanding of evolution and develop best practices for covering sensitive topics such as human evolution and life's origins.
---
On the Net:
Related Articles
- As They Return to Their Classrooms, More Than 10 Percent of Teachers Say Their School Is Not Prepared to Help Protect Students
- Kaplan College Preparatory School Kicks Off Online Summer School Enrollment
- An Empirical Study of Evolution, Creationism, and Intelligent Design Instruction in Public Schools
- ELL/ESL Scholarships Offered By Western Governors University Teachers College
- South University Receives 10-Year Accreditation From the Commission on Colleges, Southern Association of Colleges and Schools
- Hondros College Opens School of Nursing in Mason in January; Students Can Begin LPN and RN/Associate Degree Education Almost Immediately
- Milwaukee College Preparatory School Chooses ''Success Highways'' to Help At-Risk Students Take Academic Initiative
- Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools Earns District Accreditation From Southern Association of Colleges and Schools
- The Effects of Student Responsiveness on Teachers Granting Power to Students and Essay Evaluation
- Student Drinking Worries Most College Officials
 |
 |
User Comments (3)
| 3. |
Posted by April on 06/03/2009, 16:32 It's unfortunate that so many teachers think that evolution is a science. Think about how silly it would be to say that your breakfast will coalesce into a perfect omelet on your kitchen table, even though you have all the ingredients in your refrigerator, waiting for action. Would millions of years help the process of turning eggs and cheese into an omelet, or could it only be accomplished if someone put his hand to the work? Likewise, all of creation is the work of God's hand. Moral of the story: Just as you can't eat your breakfast without having someone make it, so too you can't have a planet without a Maker. |
| 2. |
Posted by Melvin on 05/08/2009, 13:11 What definition of 'theory' are you using? Exactly which scientists disagree with evolution? Are you proposing that ID is science? How is it possible to teach ID without a reference to some mystical 'supreme being'? |
| 1. |
Posted by JM5 on 05/08/2009, 10:12 Could this article and study be any more biased? Just a few thoughts here; I would be one of those future teachers who didn't know it was unconstitutional to teach creationism (though only on a national basis as some states have their own policies allowing equal time etc. (ACLU website)) There are plenty of well respected scientists, and teachers of science for that matter, who deny the scientific veracity of the THEORY of evolution (maintaining the difference between Micro- and Macro- evolution of course) Isn't that good science? coming up with new theories that debunk the old ones. Not all proponents of Intelligent Design are right wing Bible thumping fundamentalist (like myself) and ID can very easily be taught without a thread of the Biblical religion. |
RSS Feeds