• E-mail
• Print
• Comment
• Font Size
• Digg
• del.icio.us
• Discuss article

Mixing Politics, Education in Bosnia: Muslim and Croat Kids Play Together but They Don't Learn Together

Posted on: Sunday, 25 June 2006, 12:00 CDT

By Tom Hundley, Chicago Tribune

Jun. 25--BILALOVAC, Bosnia-Herzegovina -- The whitewashed stucco walls of the village school are still freckled with bullet holes, scars of a war that ended more than a decade ago.

Inside the building, the war has left scar tissue of a different kind.

Each day, Muslim and Croat children gather in the schoolyard. The two groups mingle comfortably. Boys kick a soccer ball. Girls gather in tight gaggles, whispering and casting shy glances toward the boys.

But when the bell sounds and the children scramble up the steps into the school, a kind of invisible curtain descends. They are no longer just kids; they become Muslims and Croats, and they go their separate ways.

In Bosnia-Herzegovina, this is what is known as a "divided school." It has separate classrooms for Muslims and Croats, separate teachers and administrations, separate textbooks and, in the case of the Bilalovac school, separate cleaning ladies.

"This is politics," said Suljo Nuhic, principal of the Muslim side of the school. "We don't like it, but nobody is asking us what we like."

The Bilalovac school has about 100 Croat students and 280 Muslims, or Bosniaks, as they prefer to call themselves these days.

Nuhic says he gets along fine with his Croat counterpart, whose office is next to his.

"Every day we have coffee together, and all of the teachers have normal, human, everyday cooperation," he said.

But not all of Bosnia's divided schools enjoy such amicable relations. In Zepce, 30 miles north of Bilalovac, Croats attend classes in the morning, and Bosniaks go in the afternoon. The two groups never mix. Elsewhere in Bosnia-Herzegovina, separate entrances and "Berlin Walls" in corridors enforce the division.

"Divided schools are a symbol of what's happening in this country," said Erna Ribar, an education specialist with the United Nations Children's Fund in Sarajevo.

More than 10 years after the Dayton peace agreement ended the fighting, Bosnia remains a ward of the international community, ruled by a dysfunctional government and riven by ethnic rivalries. It is a country with a flag no one salutes and a national anthem no one sings.

The good news is that the economy is growing at a brisk 5 percent a year, and with the quiet presence of 7,000 European Union troops there is little danger of a return to armed conflict. The downside is that unemployment is 39 percent while the war's two most wanted criminals, Radovan Karadzic and Gen. Ratko Mladic, remain at large.

Blaming Dayton agreement

In recent months, many analysts have concluded that the Dayton agreement has become part of the problem. The agreement ended the bloodshed by partitioning the country into a Bosnian Serb republic and a federation of Muslims and Croats. It also gave the country a weak central government and a constitution that emphasized ethnic or "national" prerogatives rather than individual rights.

Last year there was a major initiative, backed by the United States, to strengthen the central government and guide Bosnia-Herzegovina toward genuine multiethnic integration. It was supposed to be signed in Washington last November on the 10th anniversary of the Dayton agreement, but Bosnian politicians balked, and it remains unratified.

One of the main casualties of the existing constitution is the education system.

"It's ridiculous," said Fatima Hodzic, 14, an 8th grader at the Bilalovac school. "All the kids are coming to school together, we are having fun together and suddenly when we get here, we are separated."

When the Dayton constitution was first drafted, its emphasis on "national rights" was seen as a strategy to help lure refugees back. It was thought that if refugees, especially those who were the ethnic minority in a particular area, were assured that their children would be taught in their "national" language, they would feel more confident about returning.

To a degree, the strategy worked. The problem is that the national language of the old Yugoslavia was Serbo-Croat. When Serbs and Croats parted ways, so did the language, although the linguistic differences are considered superficial. Bosnian Muslims, who also spoke Serbo-Croat, now call their language Bosniak.

'Language as a weapon'

"Politicians use language as a weapon, and children are the victims," said Radmila Rangelov-Jusovic, an education specialist at Step by Step, an international organization that trains teachers.

"The politicians manipulate parents to think that something bad will happen to their children if they are not taught in their national language. It's destructive," she said.

"School is how you begin to reconstruct communities. On a local level people understand this, but in Bosnia politics runs education at every level," she said.

In addition to being taught in their respective "national" languages, each group has its own curriculum that emphasizes its separateness. For example, history textbooks for Serb students treat Gavrilo Princip, the Bosnian Serb whose assassination of Austrian Archduke Franz Ferdinand triggered World War I, as a hero; in the Croat texts, he is a terrorist.

Five years ago, Bosnian education authorities reached an interim agreement that was supposed to recognize national differences while unifying the curriculum's basic content. It was never implemented, and the divisions have deepened.

"When you start teaching them at age 6 that they are separate and that they can't sit in the same classrooms, what's going to happen when they are 26?" asked Melisa Nizic, an education specialist who has been working with Bosniak students and teachers at the Bilalovac school for about a year.

"When I first came here I didn't know how the system worked," she recalled. "So I asked questions: Do I say hello to the other teachers? Are there fights in the halls? Can I talk to kids from the other group? I was told, 'You can, but be careful with your words.'"

In school districts that are mono-ethnic, the problem may be worse.

"If you go to western Herzegovina [a heavily Croat area], there are children who believe that Croatia is their country and [Croatian wartime leader Franjo] Tudjman is their greatest hero. They never even encounter someone from the other groups," said Step by Step's Rangelov-Jusovic.

Nearly everyone agrees that the current system is spectacularly wasteful and inefficient. The scarce resources of a poor country that could be used to rebuild infrastructure are squandered on producing three sets of textbooks and staffing schools with "ethnically correct" teachers and administrators. At the Bilalovac school, Milenka Skopljaka, a Croat teacher, watches as students pour out of the building at the end of the day and the curtain of ethnic indoctrination is momentarily lifted.

"You can see for yourself: The kids are playing together normally. It's not their fault we have this system," she said. "The fault is ours--the adults, the parents and teachers."

thundley@tribune.com

-----

Copyright (c) 2006, Chicago Tribune

Distributed by Knight Ridder/Tribune Business News.

For reprints, email tmsreprints@permissionsgroup.com, call 800-374-7985 or 847-635-6550, send a fax to 847-635-6968, or write to The Permissions Group Inc., 1247 Milwaukee Ave., Suite 303, Glenview, IL 60025, USA.

Source: Chicago Tribune

More News in this Category