Last updated on April 19, 2014 at 1:20 EDT

Brussels is “Too Exclusive”, Claims Writer

February 13, 2012

BUDAPEST, Hungary, February 13, 2012 /PRNewswire/ –

Oleg Golovin, a publicist from Hungary has claimed that Brussels “does not accept
strong politicians who have an opinion of their own.”

Golovin said: “The protests today are shaking not only Moscow. The capital of Hungary,
Budapest, has not seen so many meetings for quite a long time, especially considering the
fact that unlike the general European crisis these rallies are for the current government.

“The current Prime Minister of Hungary Viktor Orban, who after eight years retook his
post in 2010 (from 1998 to 2002 he headed the government), has already done quite a lot -
from changing the country’s name from the “Republic of Hungary” to simply “Hungary” to
amending the Constitution. Many people accuse him of the right populism, but for a long
time in Hungary there was no leader, for whom more than 100 000 people (in the country
with 10 million) were ready to protest on the streets after work.

“The Hungarians believe that Orban’s potential was revealed only during the second
term when he started the real consolidation of power. That’s why his opponents criticize
him for innovations in the mass media laws, for which he was accused of introducing
censorship and for the new Central Bank law, to which Brussels is opposed.

“The European Union is kind of a trap for its members – with the formal observance of
the principle of every country’s economic sovereignty, in fact the degree of European
Commission’s influence in the internal affairs is growing. It became especially evident
during the crisis. But for Germany’s stubborn desire in the European Commission to keep
euro zone unchanged (and, hence, its savings), the situation in Greece would have been
solved in a traditional way – the protests of the population, Greece leaves the euro zone,
the return of the national currency – drachma, jumping inflation, default and the gradual
recovery of the real sector of economy. But it is pointless for poor Greeks even to start
a revolution at home as all the decisions are made not there, but in Brussels.

“Quite the same situation is now in Hungary, though as a result of Orban’s
consolidation of the economy the budget deficit amounted to about 3%, and Hungary occupied
the 7th place among the EU countries at this level. Inflation of the Hungarian forint by
30% has remained Budapest’s internal problem, which it tried to solve on their own through
state control of the Central Bank. Euro-bureaucrats from the European Commission didn’t
like such state protectionism very much. They began to threaten almost with the exclusion
of Hungary from the European Union. For justice’s sake it should be mentioned that the
same ideas could be heard at demonstrations in Budapest, only from the opposite side.

“The conflict between Viktor Orban, one of the few remaining outstanding leaders of
modern Europe, with officials of the European Union is quite demonstrative. Built on the
principle of characterlessness the EU system does not accept strong politicians who have
an opinion of their own like Silvio Berlusconi, Nicolas Sarkozy, Viktor Orban and Vladimir
Putin. That’s why, in particular, Brussels will cast doubt on Putin’s victory in the
upcoming elections.

“Anyone who tries to build its own, different from the imposed by Brussels, system of
values, nowadays is destined to fight alone. Some of them manage to keep their position,
but Berlusconi’s example says that everything has an end. Only really big players can
afford to play by their rules without looking at others.

“Viktor Orban decided to remember the great history of Hungary and at least on the
national level he gave his people moral compensation for the painful Treaty of Trianon in
1920, when Hungary lost two-thirds of its former territory. He tried to conduct an
independent economic policy and build a new Great Hungary. But he wasn’t understood in a
faceless European Commission with some charisma from Rompuy and Barroso. He became an

“The problem of the crisis of leadership in Europe is not new, but now it can be seen
particularly clear. Today when regionalization movements are growing rapidly any strong
player becomes the center of local attraction. Putin’s project of creating the Eurasian
Union can significantly accelerate the economic development of its members. But it will
more pleasant for Moscow to build strong relationship with leaders in Berlin, Paris, Rome
and Budapest than with dull and U.S.-controlled European bureaucrats in Brussels.”

Oleg Golovin, publicist

SOURCE Russia Insights www.russia-insights.com

Source: PR Newswire