Belluck & Fox Defeats Challenge to New York Mesothelioma Verdict

May 27, 2012

A New York Court of Appeals ruling lets stand the $1.5 million judgment obtained by the New York law firm of Belluck & Fox, LLP, in a case involving a man who died from his exposure to asbestos from the repair of valves.

New York, NY (PRWEB) May 26, 2012

A recent ruling by the New York Court of Appeals has upheld a $1.5 million asbestos verdict obtained by the New York mesothelioma lawyers of Belluck & Fox, LLP, including the landmark finding by the jury that the defendant, Fisher Controls International, LLC, acted with a reckless disregard towards the safety of the plaintiff, Ronald Drabczyk.

The case is Drabczyk v. Fisher Controls International, LLC (Erie County Index No. 2005/1583).

Drabczyk, who resided in Buffalo, New York, died from his exposure to asbestos in 2005. Despite only being assessed a small percentage of fault, the finding that Fisher was reckless means it is liable for the entire judgment under New York law.

In the May 8 court order, the Court of Appeals denied a motion that had been filed by Fisher, seeking to set aside the reckless disregard finding made by an Erie County jury in October 2009.

In declining to address Fisher´s motion, the Court of Appeals also declined to address arguments made by Crane Co., another valve manufacturer who had filed a brief in support of Fisher and pleaded with the Court of Appeals to decide an issue that could have benefited both Fisher and Crane Co. in future asbestos cases.

The Court of Appeals´ ruling upholds the jury´s finding that Fisher had acted with a reckless disregard for the man´s safety.

As a result of the reckless misconduct finding, under New York law, the Iowa-based valve manufacturer is liable for the full $1.5 million amount of the judgment (reduced by settlements received by the plaintiff from other parties).

“This is the first asbestos verdict in the country against Fisher for injury resulting from exposure to asbestos in Fisher products,” said Seth Dymond, a New York mesothelioma attorney and a Belluck & Fox partner who handled the appeal for the law firm.

“This verdict reaffirms that corporations that fail to warn workers of known dangers in their products will be held fully accountable for the damage they cause,” Dymond said. “And if they act with a reckless disregard for workers´ safety, they will be responsible for the full weight of the verdict under the laws of the State of New York no matter their percentage of fault.”

According to court documents, Mr. Drabczyk had worked at the Hooker Chemical plant in Niagara Falls, NY, from 1970 to 1996. He repaired and refurbished valves sold by Fisher, which is a subsidiary of St. Louis-based Emerson Electric Co. More than half of the valves that Fisher sold to the repairman´s employer contained asbestos. Further, Fisher supplied asbestos-containing replacement parts to the plant for use in its valves that further exposed Mr. Drabczyk to lethal doses of asbestos.

According to Dymond, in October 2004, the valve repairman was diagnosed with mesothelioma, a cancer of the lining of the chest that is caused by exposure to asbestos. He filed the personal injury action in Erie County Supreme Court before he passed away in November 2005, just 13 months after his diagnosis.

After a four-week trial, the jury returned a verdict in October 2009, apportioning five percent of the liability for the man´s damages, including pain and suffering, to Fisher. The same jury found that Fisher had acted with reckless disregard for the man´s safety.

Under New York law, a defendant is only liable for its share of fault unless, among other factors, it is found to have acted recklessly. Once that finding is made, the defendant can be held liable for the full amount of damages.

Belluck & Fox partner Jordan Fox led the trial team that obtained the verdict and the judgment, which was entered in September 2010. Dymond handled the post-verdict litigation for the New York personal injury firm.

The Supreme Court of New York denied Fisher´s motion to set aside the verdict in July 2010. The Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department, affirmed in part in February 2012. The Court of Appeals´ May 8 ruling denied Fisher´s motion to review the case.

The ruling comes after two Belluck & Fox mesothelioma verdicts — a $32 million verdict in Dummitt v. A.W. Chesterton (No. 190196/10) and a $19.5 million verdict in Konstantin v. 630 Third Avenue Associates (No. 190134/10) — were listed among the top 10 New York verdicts of 2011 .

About Belluck & Fox, LLP

Belluck & Fox, LLP, is a nationally recognized law firm that represents individuals with asbestos and mesothelioma claims, as well as victims of crime, motorcycle crashes, lead paint and other serious injuries. The firm provides personalized and professional representation and has won more than $500 million in compensation for clients and their families.

Partner Joseph W. Belluck is AV-rated by Martindale-Hubbell and is listed in Best Lawyers in America, New York Magazine´s “Best Lawyers in the New York Area” and in Super Lawyers. Mr. Belluck has won numerous cases involving injuries from asbestos, defective medical products, tobacco and lead paint.

Partner Jordan Fox is a well-known asbestos and mesothelioma attorney who has been named to the Best Lawyers in America, New York Magazine´s “Best Lawyers in the New York Area” and to Super Lawyers. On two separate occasions his verdicts were featured as the National Law Journal´s Largest Verdict of the Year. Two of his recent verdicts were listed among the top ten verdicts in New York State for 2011.

Belluck & Fox, LLP, is featured on the list of America’s best law firms, which was published jointly by U.S. News & World Report and Best Lawyers magazine. The listing showcases 8,782 different law firms ranked in one or more of 81 major practice areas.

For more information, contact the firm at (877) 637-6843 or through the online contact form.

For the original version on PRWeb visit: http://www.prweb.com/releases/prwebny-mesothelioma-lawyer/mesothelioma-verdict/prweb9547870.htm

Source: prweb

comments powered by Disqus