N.Y. court rules Brown didn’t copy ‘Da Vinci Code’

By Claudia Parsons

NEW YORK (Reuters) – Best-selling author Dan Brown has won
a court ruling against another writer who claimed Brown’s book
“The Da Vinci Code” copied elements from two of his books,
Brown’s publisher, Random House, said on Friday.

Brown avoided $150 million in damages author Lewis Perdue
had sought in a legal ruling that also characterized his
blockbuster book as an “intellectual” work.

Perdue had claimed “The Da Vinci Code,” which has 36
million copies in print worldwide, infringed the copyright of
his novels “Daughter of God” and “The Da Vinci Legacy.”

Perdue sought $150 million damages and asked the court to
block distribution of the book and a movie of “The Da Vinci
Code” that is in production by Sony Pictures.

He alleged that Brown copied the basic premise of “Daughter
of God,” including notions of a “divine feminine” and the
transition from a female to a male-dominated church under Roman
Emperor Constantine.

Perdue could not immediately be reached for comment.

“The Da Vinci Code” has been roundly condemned by the Roman
Catholic Church because the plot is based on the theory that
Jesus was married to Mary Magdalene and had children, whose
descendants have endured to the present day.

Perdue’s book “Daughter of God” is an art-world thriller
featuring an American husband and wife and involving a document
that tells the story of a second Messiah named Sophia who lived
in the fourth century.

Judge George Daniels of U.S. District Court in New York
made a detailed analysis of the plots of the two books, as well
as Perdue’s earlier work, “The Da Vinci Legacy,” which shares
some elements with his later novel.

“A reasonable average lay observer would not conclude that
‘The Da Vinci Code’ is substantially similar to ‘Daughter of
God,”‘ Daniels wrote in his summary judgment.

“Any slightly similar elements are on the level of
generalized or otherwise unprotectable ideas,” he said, adding
that copyright does not protect an idea, but only the
expression of an idea.

Daniels said while both novels were mystery thrillers,
“Daughter of God” was more action-packed with gunfights and
violent deaths.

“‘The Da Vinci Code,’ on the other hand, was an
intellectual, complex treasure hunt,” he said.

Brown initiated the proceedings by filing a suit seeking a
declaratory ruling that his book did not infringe Perdue’s
copyright. Perdue, who has a Web site documenting what he calls
Brown’s plagiarism, then countersued.