Saddam faces court amid questions over trial

By Luke Baker and Michael Georgy

BAGHDAD (Reuters) – Former Iraqi president Saddam Hussein
will be tried in a U.S.-backed court in Baghdad on Wednesday
for crimes against humanity for allegedly ordering the killing
of more than 140 people two decades ago.

Amid security unprecedented even for warring Iraq, the
overthrown leader and seven other members of his defunct Baath
Party will be tried in Court No. 1 of the Iraqi Special
Tribunal inside the capital’s fortress-like Green Zone
compound.

Two mortar rounds landed outside the Zone about an hour
before people began filing into court around 11 a.m. (0800
GMT).

The trial will be presided over by a five-member panel of
judges headed by Rizgar Mohammed Amin, an ethnic Kurd from the
northern city of Sulaimaniya, U.S. officials said. Saddam is
later expected to face genocide charges for killing Kurds.

However, the first hearing may last just hours before the
trial is adjourned, possibly for weeks or months. Saddam’s
lawyer, who said his client was in good spirits on the eve of
the trial, is seeking a delay to allow more time to prepare.

Senior Iraqi leaders were in the courthouse in a former
Baath Party building, including Deputy Prime Minister Ahmad
Chalabi and Hussain al-Shahristani, a nuclear scientist jailed
for refusing to work on Saddam’s weapons program.

Both men are from the Shi’ite majority, oppressed by Saddam
but now in power under U.S. protection: “It is very important
that justice is done and is seen to be done,” said Chalabi.

The trial comes two years after Saddam was found hiding in
a hole near where he was born, and follows constant calls from
millions of Iraqis impatient for him to be brought to justice.

Iraq’s government, led by long-time foes of Saddam and
seeking popularity ahead of December elections, hopes the trial
will boost public morale in a country struggling with the
hardships of the insurgency 2-1/2 years after the war began.

Human rights groups have expressed unease about the
possibility of “victor’s justice,” warning that the trial must
not only be fair, but be seen to be fair, and raising concerns
about the legitimacy of a body set up during U.S. occupation.

It was not clear exactly when the session would begin.

SUPPORTERS RALLY FOR SADDAM

The eyes of the world will be on the trial, which will be
televised, probably with a delay, not just to capture the
moment that Saddam stands in the dock, but to watch whether
Iraq under its new leadership can fairly try its deposed
ex-dictator.

If found guilty, Saddam could face death by hanging and
according to new statutes governing the tribunal, any sentence
would have to be carried out within 30 days of all appeals
being exhausted. That means Saddam could be executed before
being tried for other crimes such as genocide.

While the former president’s day in court has been long
awaited by millions of Iraqis and others, it may not last long.

Sources close to the tribunal say the case may be quickly
adjourned so the judges, partly trained in Britain over the
past year, can study defense motions for a dismissal or delay.

Saddam, 68, may not speak other than to confirm his name
when charges are read out. At a pre-trial hearing in July last
year he defiantly gave his occupation as “president of Iraq.”

In a statement posted on the Internet on Tuesday, people
calling themselves members of the Baath Party urged Saddam’s
followers to rise up and defy the court with gunfire.

In Tikrit, Saddam’s hometown, around two dozen young men
rallied and chanted for Saddam, shouting “Long Live Saddam
Hussein” and carrying banners with slogans like “Down with the
occupation and the puppet government.”

“The trial is unfair,” said student Dawud Farham, aged 18.
“They should put on trial those who are tearing apart Iraq and
its people.”

In court, Saddam and his co-defendants will face a
five-judge panel sitting on a raised dais behind court clerks.
A curtain will protect the identity of witnesses, and
bullet-proof glass will separate the few observers from the
court.

1982 ASSASSINATION ATTEMPT

Khalil al-Dulaimi, Saddam’s chief lawyer, said on Tuesday
that his client was calm and confident of his innocence.

An Iraqi with little experience of arguing major cases,
such as those involving alleged crimes against humanity,
Dulaimi has said he intends to challenge the legitimacy of the
court.

The defense team has said he will present a dossier of 122
points designed to show that the court, set up by Americans,
does not have jurisdiction over Saddam and is illegal.

He will also ask for more time to study the more than 800
pages of evidence collected by investigators over the past two
years and which the defense team received just 45 days ago.

He may also argue that Saddam had presidential immunity.

The charges stem from events that took place on July 8,
1982, when a group of young men linked to the Shi’ite Dawa
Party attempted to assassinate Saddam as his armored motorcade
passed through Dujail, a town about 60 km (35 miles) north of
Baghdad.

In retaliation for the botched attempt on his life,
prosecutors will try to show that Saddam ordered his henchmen
to hunt down, torture and kill scores of men from the town, not
just immediately after that day, but in the years that
followed.

Women and children were also alleged to have been forcibly
removed from Dujail, taken to Abu Ghraib prison and later sent
to an internment camp in the desert near the border with Saudi
Arabia where many ultimately “disappeared.”

(Additional reporting by Aseel Kami and Alastair Macdonald)