Quantcast
Last updated on May 28, 2012 at 8:11 EDT

Luttig, Alito contenders as Bush mulls court pick

October 29, 2005
Repost This

By Caren Bohan

WASHINGTON (Reuters) – President George W. Bush on Saturday
was narrowing his choices of Supreme Court nominees to replace
Harriet Miers as Republicans said the short list consisted of
highly credentialed, solidly conservative judges.

Among the candidates most talked about were appeals court
judges Michael Luttig and Samuel Alito. Bush, who is spending
the weekend at his Camp David retreat, was expected to unveil
his choice within days.

A source close to the selection process who spoke on
condition of anonymity said avoiding a battle with Democrats,
who have warned Bush about picking a right-wing activist, would
not be the president’s top priority.

“What we know from the Miers nomination is that people on
all sides of the political spectrum wanted the highest quality,
and that’s what the president will deliver,” the source said.

“I think it will be extremely difficult for Senate
Democrats to oppose someone who is extraordinarily well
qualified and who shares the president’s judicial philosophy,”
the source added.

Conservatives are eager for a conservative in the mold of
justices Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas to replace the
retiring Sandra Day O’Connor, a moderate conservative and often
pivotal swing vote on the divided court.

Luttig, 51, a judge on the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of
Appeals in Richmond, Virginia, worked as a clerk for Scalia
when Scalia was an appeals court judge.

He helped in the effort to get Thomas and Supreme Court
Justice David Souter — both nominated to the high court by
Bush’s father — confirmed by the Senate. Luttig also has
worked in the Justice Department and private practice.

Alito, 55, is sometimes given the nickname “Scalito” — a
comparison to Scalia, who shares his Italian heritage as well
as his reputation for conservatism and a strong intellect. He
is a judge on the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in
Philadelphia.

‘A COMPETING HEADLINE’

The decision comes as Bush seeks to embark on a fresh start
after a series of problems exposed a lack of sure-footedness by
normally disciplined White House aides.

The latest blow to a president whose approval ratings have
already fallen to all-time lows was Friday’s indictment and
resignation of top vice presidential aide Lewis Libby in the
CIA leak investigation.

Larry Sabato, professor of politics at the University of
Virginia said the president might reach out to his conservative
supporters by generating “a competing headline” to get the
focus away from the leak investigation.

“He needs to restore his Republican base and this is the
way to do it,” Sabato said of the court pick.

In addition to Luttig and Alito, Bush is also said to be
looking at appeals court judges Michael McConnell, Edith Jones
and Alice Batchelder.

Priscilla Owen and Janice Rogers Brown are also
possibilities, although the two judges — who were named to the
appellate court by Bush — were initially blocked by Senate
Democrats before making it through on a compromise deal.

The list Bush is reviewing is similar to the one he focused
on just before the surprise pick of Miers on October 3.

Miers, who withdrew her candidacy on Thursday, is with Bush
at Camp David advising him in the deliberations. Her candidacy
for the Supreme Court triggered a revolt by conservatives who
thought the White House counsel and longtime friend of the
president lacked the credentials and clear record needed to
move the court firmly to the right.

White House spokesman Scott McClellan told reporters on
Friday that Bush was already “familiar with a number of
potential nominees and so he has a foundation to start with.”

The writings and rulings of whomever Bush chooses will be
looked at closely for hints on their views of contentious
social issues like abortion.

In a letter to Bush, Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid, a
Nevada Democrat, and Vermont Sen. Patrick Leahy, top Democrat
on the Senate Judiciary Committee, urged him not to pick “an
activist” with an ideological agenda.

(Additional reporting by Steve Holland)


Source: