Saving Heart Attack Victims With Computer Science
Researchers find EKG anomalies that warn whose heart attacks could be fatal
Newly discovered subtle markers of heart damage hidden in plain sight among hours of EKG recordings could help doctors identify which heart attack patients are at high risk of dying soon.
That’s according to a new study involving researchers from the University of Michigan, MIT, Harvard Medical School, and Brigham and Women’s Hospital in Boston. It is published in the Sept. 28 edition of Science Translational Medicine.
The findings could help match tens of thousands of cardiac patients with life-saving treatment in time. Approximately 1 million Americans have a heart attack each year. In certain age groups, more than a quarter of those who survive the initial attack end up dying of complications within a year, according to the American Heart Association.
“Today’s methods for determining which heart attack victims need the most aggressive treatments can identify some groups of patients at a high risk of complications. But they miss most of the deaths—up to 70 percent of them,” said Zeeshan Syed, an assistant professor in the U-M Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science and first author of the study.
Using data mining and machine learning techniques, the researchers sifted through 24-hour continuous electrocardiograms (EKGs or ECGs) from 4,557 heart attack patients enrolled in a large clinical trial led by the Brigham and Women’s Hospital/Harvard Medical School TIMI Study Group, one of the world’s leading cardiovascular research organizations. The electrocardiogram measures and displays the electrical activity of the heart.
The researchers found that the EKG signals from many of the patients who later suffered cardiovascular death contained similar errant patterns that until now were dismissed as noise or simply undetectable.
“There’s information buried in the noise, and it’s almost invisible because of the sheer volume of the data. But by using sophisticated computational techniques, we can separate what is truly noise from what is actually abnormal behavior that tells us how unstable the heart is,” Syed said.
Today, doctors prescribe the most aggressive post-heart attack treatments based on several factors including the patient’s overall health, medical history, the results of several blood tests, and an echocardiogram. The echocardiogram (different from an electrocardiogram) uses ultrasound to image the heart and measure how much blood it pumps through with each beat.
“Unfortunately, it is a rather blunt metric and we tend to miss a fair number of the patients with the sickest hearts,” said Benjamin Scirica, a cardiologist at Brigham and Women’s Hospital who was also involved in the study. “We have to do a better job of identifying patients at high risk.”
During the months after a heart attack, patients are particularly vulnerable to sudden death due to irregular heart rhythms. These could be prevented with medication or implantable defibrillators, which can shock the heart back into rhythm. Right now, Scirica said, it’s difficult to determine who needs them before it’s too late. A majority of patients who have implantable defibrillators never end up needing them. And a majority of people who die of sudden cardiac arrest were not shown to be candidates for a defibrillator using today’s tests.
Syed got interested in these problems after his father suffered a heart attack years ago. It occurred to him how they might catch more people slipping through the tests.
Working with MIT professors John Guttag and Collin Stultz, Syed utilized one of the oldest tools in cardiology: the electrocardiogram that keeps a beeping vigil by a heart attack patient’s hospital bedside. It is monitored continually while a patient is hospitalized, but it’s difficult for doctors to determine the most important predictors of outcome from these long recordings. They typically look at its data in snapshots that are only a few seconds long.
“We’re reaching a point in medicine where our ability to collect data has far out-stripped our ability to analyze or digest it,” said Guttag, a professor in the MIT Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science and a group leader in MIT’s Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory (CSAIL). “You can’t ask a physician to look at 72-hours worth of ECG data, so people have focused on the things you can learn by looking at tiny pieces of it.”
“What is amazing is we’re probably using only a small fraction of the information that’s collected by ECGs,” Scirica said.
Syed and his colleagues developed new ways to parse through the data to find abnormalities—”computational biomarkers” that point to defects in the heart muscle and nervous system that evolve over time. The biomarkers are termed morphologic variability, heart rate motifs and symbolic mismatch.
Morphologic variability is the amount of subtle variability in the shape of apparently normal-looking heartbeats over long periods of time. Heart rate motifs refer to specific sequences of changes in heart rate that reflect whether the heart is responding to nervous system signals as it should. And symbolic mismatch measures how different a patient’s long-term EKG signal is compared with those of other patients with similar clinical histories.
To prove that patients in the study whose EKG signals had these properties were sicker and more likely to die, the researchers used the signals to pick out who was still alive a year after a heart attack, and who was not. They found that those with at least one of the abnormalities were between two and three times more likely to die within 12 months. And by adding all three of the techniques to doctors’ current assessment tools, they could predict 50 percent more deaths with fewer false positives.
“That translates into thousands or tens of thousands of patients for whom doctors could potentially prescribe an effective preventative treatment based on a more individualized assessment of their risk of complications,” Syed said.
The new techniques use data that is already routinely collected during hospital visits, so putting them into practice would not raise costs or further burden caregivers or patients.
“Our findings demonstrate that low cost, non-invasive, and easily obtained biometric data, such as the ECG, can be used to identify patients at high risk of adverse outcomes. We hope that this work ignites a new paradigm in the field of cardiovascular risk stratification,” said Collin Stultz, a cardiologist and an associate professor in the MIT Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science and the Harvard-MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology. Stultz is also affiliated with CSAIL.
This research was funded by the National Science Foundation, the Center for Integration of Medicine and Innovative Technology, Quanta Computer, and the Harvard-MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology. The paper is titled “Computationally Generated Cardiac Biomarkers for Risk Stratification Following After Acute Coronary Syndrome.” Ongoing research is supported by the American Heart Association.
On the Net: