Survey: Parental Law Won't Stop Teen Sex
Posted on: Wednesday, 19 January 2005, 00:00 CST
CHICAGO -- Laws that would require parents to be notified when teens seek birth control would do little to curb underage sex and could cause a troubling number of girls to engage in unsafe intercourse, a survey of teens in 33 states suggests.
Nearly one in five teen girls surveyed at federally funded family planning clinics nationwide said they would either use no birth control or unreliable methods, and only 7 percent said they would stop having sex if parental-notification laws were enacted, according to the study by The Alan Guttmacher Institute, an advocacy group that supports reproductive choice.
The results, based on responses from 1,526 girls under the age of 18 who were given anonymous questionnaires, echo smaller, more local studies.
The study appears in Wednesday's Journal of the American Medical Association.
Obtaining contraceptive prescriptions was the most common reason for the girls' visits to the clinics, but other reasons included pregnancy testing and Pap tests, said Guttmacher researcher Rachel Jones.
Sixty percent said their parents knew about the visits, and 59 percent said they would continue to seek contraception at the clinic even if parental-notification laws were enacted.
However, 18 percent said they would avoid birth control or would use the rhythm or withdrawal methods during sex, which are far less reliable than contraceptives. The result likely would be an increase in unplanned pregnancies and sexually transmitted diseases, Jones said.
Forty-six percent of girls said they would use over-the-counter methods such as condoms instead of prescription birth control if such laws were enacted.
Some girls checked more than one response when queried about the laws.
Parental-notification proposals that would affect federally funded clinics have been repeatedly introduced in Congress in the past few years. Local laws requiring at least some minors to inform their parents when seeking prescription contraceptives are already in place in Texas, Utah and at least one county in Illinois, Guttmacher Institute research shows.
Wendy Wright of Concerned Women for America, a group that supports abstinence and parental notification, called the study misleading and "an attempt to manipulate public policy."
Abstinence is more effective than birth control at avoiding "all the problems" associated with teen sex, including disease risk, pregnancy and too-early emotional attachment, Wright said.
---
On the Net:
JAMA: http://jama.ama-assn.org
Source: Associated Press/AP Online
Related Articles
- Study Identifies Women At Risk Of Gaining Excessive Weight With Injectable Birth Control
- New Study Shows Women Experience Significantly Less Unscheduled Bleeding With the ORTHO TRI-CYCLEN(R) LO Birth Control Pill Versus Another Pill
- Study Links Birth Control Pill to Artery-Clogging Plaque
- Sex Ed to Cover Birth Control: Abstinence Will Be City Classes' Focus
- FDA: More Study Needed on Birth Control Patch Risk
- Study on Birth Control Flawed -- U.S. Now Doubts Findings That Pills Reduce the Risks of Heart Disease
- Two Birth-Control-Pill Studies Questioned
- Experts Explain Seeming Paradox of Birth Control Pill Study
- Birth Control Pills Linked to Lower Risk of Diseases ; Findings Contradict Previous Studies
- Birth Control Pill Safe, Major Study Assures Women
User Comments (0)


RSS Feeds