Study: Livestock Antibiotic Ban Poses Risk To Food Safety
Posted on: Tuesday, 24 March 2009, 14:30 CDT
Legislation that would block the use of antibiotics for veterinary and farm use would be detrimental to the health of US livestock as well as pose risks for national food safety, according to the president of the American Farm Bureau Federation.
In an open letter to Congress on Tuesday, AFBF President Bob Stallman said bills H.R. 1549 and S. 619 would increase the amount of animal deaths, resulting in skyrocketing producer costs, falling meat production, and rising consumer costs.
“Farmers and ranchers and the veterinarians they work with use antibiotics carefully, judiciously and according to label instructions, primarily to treat, prevent and control disease in our flocks and herds,” Stallman said.
“Antibiotics are critically important to the health and welfare of the animals and to the safety of the food produced.”
Stallman pointed to the 40-year history of antibiotic use in farm animals to show that it does not pose a human health threat.
“In order to raise healthy animals, we need tools to keep them healthy – including medicines that have been approved as safe and effective by the Food and Drug Administration,” Stallman said.
“Restricting access to these important tools will jeopardize animal health and compromise our ability to contribute to public health through food safety.”
But the bill, introduced in the House of Representatives by Louise Slaughter and in the Senate by Edward Kennedy, seeks to outlaw the use of antibiotics in livestock unless they are sick in an effort to reduce health risk from the possible development of antibiotic-resistant diseases.
Stallman told members of Congress that by opposing the bills, they would “protect the professional judgment of veterinarians and livestock producers in providing safe and healthful meat products” for consumers.
According to a Union of Concerned Scientists study cited by Reuters, an estimated 70 percent of all antibiotics sold in the United States go toward healthy livestock.
---
On the Net:
Source: redOrbit Staff & Wire Reports
Related Articles
- New Health Canada Data On Bisphenol A Strongly Supports the Safety of Bottled Water, Baby Food and Infant Formula Products
- National Business Group on Health Recognizes Verizon as a Best Employer for Healthy Lifestyles
- Women's Health The Daily Fix Your Guide to Healthy Habits for Good Nutrition
- Monitor the Evolving Issue of Animal Health and Safe Food Production Today
- Marginally Slower Yet Robust Growth Continues for Health and Wellness Food Market in Indonesia
- Health-Savvy Wonder Foods
- India is One of the Largest Countries in the Asia-Pacific Region for Sale of Health & Wellness Packaged Food
- Health Policy Experts Conclude That Health Courts Will Have Major Advantages For Patient Safety And Urge That Demonstration Projects Be Undertaken
- Organics' Edge Questioned: Antibiotic-Free Foods Not Necessarily Safer for People, Study Says
- Antibiotic-Free Food Not Necessarily Safer for People, Study Says
User Comments (1)
| 1. |
Posted by Ray R on 03/25/2009, 08:46 Where exactly in this article is the description of the "study" mentioned in the headline? |


RSS Feeds