California Adds Pot to List of Cancer-Causing Substances
Posted on: Sunday, 5 July 2009, 10:30 CDT
In a move that has the good people of California scratching their heads in perplexity, state lawmakers recently passed a measure that would eventually require medical marijuana—prescribed most frequently to alleviate suffering in patients with severe cancer—to carry a warning label telling of its potential cancer-causing risks.Last month state environmental regulators decided that cannabis should be added to its official list of substances known to cause cancer, which will likely lead to warning signs in marijuana dispensaries and cautionary labels on product packaging.
In a 1996 referendum, Californians voted to legalize the leafy green stuff for patients ailing under serious diseases such as AIDS, cancer and glaucoma. A number of research studies have pointed to the unique benefits of marijuana in counteracting the pain, nausea and “wasting-effect” that often accompanies the late stages of AIDS and cancer in particular.
Defenders of pot legalization have argued that scientists have long known that marijuana smoke contains carcinogens, but that this does not necessarily prove a causal relationship with cancer.
Regulators have countered this claim however, pointing to studies conducted by the state’s Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment in which "marijuana smoke was clearly shown, through scientifically valid testing according to generally accepted principles, to cause cancer," according to an agency statement.
Dr . Thomas Mack, a University of Southern California epidemiologist and chairman of the committee, said the decision to add marijuana smoke to the official list of cancer-causing substances is no big shocker.
“If you take a piece of vegetable material, a leaf, and burn it, you're going to get the type of compounds that cause cancer,” explained Mack.
Still, Mack agrees to some extent with the defenders of marijuana legalization, saying that the data linking marijuana smoke to cancer is only “suggestive” and by no means conclusive.
Critics of the regulatory decision have pointed to a number of methodological flaws in the studies reviewed by the committee, such as the inclusion of data from studies conducted in North Africa, where marijuana is typically mixed with tobacco.
There is by no means a consensus in the scientific community regarding the relationship between pot smoke and cancer. One 2006 study even indicated that marijuana smokers may actually be at a reduced risk of developing cancer than nonsmokers.
“If they want to classify marijuana smoke as carcinogenic, then that is true. It contains carcinogens,” said Donald Tashkin, a longtime marijuana researcher at the University of California. "That doesn't mean it causes cancer."
Ironically, the regulators’ authority to list marijuana as a cancer-causing substance derives from another voter-approved measure known as Proposition 65, which instructs state health officials to compile a list of all substances that can lead to cancer, birth defects or reproductive abnormalities.
First instituted in 1986, critics contend that the list of dangerous substances has grown absurdly long, including such common products as aspirin, gasoline, potato chips and French fries.
Dr. Frank Lucido of Berkeley, vice president of the American Academy of Cannabinoid Medicine, is a true believer in the benefits of medical marijuana and says that he has been prescribing it to patients since it first became legal in 1996. The AACD is a recently formed organization of physicians who study and advise standards for medical marijuana use.
Lucido says that while he will not stop prescribing marijuana as a result of the legislation, he may begin suggesting that patients take it in a smoke-free form, such as marijuana-infused foods or vaporizers.
“Obviously, it's never good to breathe smoke if you can avoid it,” Lucido said.
------------
On The Net:
USC
Source: redOrbit staff
Related Articles
- Michigan State Medical Society Says Smoke-Free Workplaces 'Most Significant Ever' In Michigan Public Health Efforts
- Michigan State Medical Society Weighs in on Proposed Federal Health Care Reform Legislation
- AMA Honors Former Indiana State Medical Association Executive
- Oklahoma State Medical Association Endorses CoreVault
- Lung Cancer Radiation Scarring is Studied
- Misys Healthcare Systems Selected As Affinity Partner By Connecticut State Medical Society
- Health Net and Connecticut State Medical Society-Individual Practice Association Distribute $4 Million to Physicians for Quality Care
- Immune Stimulants May Help Cancer Patients, Study Shows
- Federal Monitor May Oversee State's Medical University
- Health Net and the Connecticut State Medical Society-IPA Announce Pay for Performance Program for 2005
User Comments (8)
| 8. |
Posted by John Thomas on 07/08/2009, 23:51 Donuts make u FAT The problem is, the crime and violence make lots of powerful people lots of money. Once we expose the REAL reasons they fight to keep the fraud of marijuana prohibition, it will be all over. |
| 7. |
Posted by & Donuts make u FAT on 07/08/2009, 18:11 I'm sick of it!!!!!!!!! I like pot. You like beer. Who's correct on this? It's insane. The millions should not need a buffer like medical marijuana to get smoke. The intolerant squares (that enjoy a drink) say they just want medical marijuana to get high. And saying it's medical is an excuse. Well so what. I will never touch crack, coke, or meth. And it's never been gateway drug for me or any of my successful adult friends. I get high once every 2 weeks. Why do I have to have excuses? This whole law is illogical. Why not make donuts and soft drinks illegal? They make you fat and give you diabetes. And everyone knows one donut leads to another. I like pot. So what. Am I a sinner? Have I hurt anyone? Have I stole anything? You like a drink. I like a puff. WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE? Just legalize it, tax it, regulate it. AND END THE CRIME AND VIOLENCE CREATED BY KEEPING IT ILLEGAL! What a bunch of *%*^$& hypocrites! Think about that the next time you're watching the big game with a beer in your hand watching a Budwiser commercial. |
| 6. |
Posted by kathy on 07/08/2009, 15:29 When folks can purchase it legally then resell it out of state couldnt think of a faster way to bring money to California. |
| 5. |
Posted by Richard Steeb on 07/06/2009, 09:50 Too bad the prop65 ***** neglected to read up on the TASHKIN STUDY. You know, the one that showed cannabis to be PROTECTIVE AGAINST CANCER. Look it up. |
| 4. |
Posted by John Thomas on 07/06/2009, 00:50 The study did not conclude marijuana causes cancer. It said it found cancer causing ingredients in marijuana smoke. The real issue is that despite containing some cancerous ingredients, NOBODY has ever died from marijuana smoke-induced cancer. Neither have there any reports of anyone having it. This is significant. -------- The government suppressed the studies in the late 70s that found marijuana has anti-cancerous benefits. But new studies now confirm them. This is combined with the fact that marijuana smokers consume a tiny fraction of the smoke that tobacco smokers do. It's likely tokers are below the critical mass of exposure required. ------- This issue becomes moot, anyway, with the vaporization of marijuana. It has all the same benefits of smoked marijuana (rapid onset, titration) and none of the cancerous ingredients of marijuana smoke. ---- As the DEA's own administrative law judge, Francis Young, concluded after an exhaustive review of the evidence: "Marijuana, in it's natural state, is one of the safest therapuetic substances known to man." |
| 3. |
Posted by scooty on 07/05/2009, 15:23 Waaah! Waaaaaah! De' mean ole' librals is pickin' on me again! Waaaaaaaaah! |
| 2. |
Posted by Derek on 07/05/2009, 13:53 It seems that the government likes things that will kill or hurt you in some way, so in order to legalize cannabis, may be we should just say yes it will kill you or hurt you in some way. then the government will more thank likely legalize it. |
| 1. |
Posted by John on 07/05/2009, 12:48 Yes and oxygen causes cancer too. In fact oxygen free radicals are the prime cause of the DNA mutations that cause cancer. AND most of the oxygem free radical induced cancer is derived from the process of manufacturing energy from food. So lets ban both food and breathing. |


RSS Feeds