Review: High-Dose Vitamin E Supplementation is Associated With Increased All-Cause Mortality/COMMENTARY
Posted on: Sunday, 24 July 2005, 03:01 CDT
Miller ER III, Pastor-Barriuso R, Dalai D, et al. Meta-analysis: high-dosage vitamin E supplementation may increase all-cause mortality. Ann Intern Med. 2005;142:37-46.
Clinical impact ratings: GIM/FP/GP ******** Cardiology *******
QUESTIONS
Does vitamin E supplementation increase all-cause mortality? Does a dose-response relation exist between vitamin E and all-cause mortality?
METHODS
Data sources: MEDLINE (1966 to August 2004), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, bibliographies of relevant studies and reviews, and personal files of the investigators.
Study selection and assessment: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared vitamin E supplementation (alone or combined with other vitamins or minerals) with a control or placebo group in men or non-pregnant women, study duration and follow-up was > 1 year, and ≥ 10 deaths occurred.
Outcomes: All-cause mortality.
MAIN RESULTS
19 RCTs (n = 135 967, mean age range 47 to 84 y) met the selection criteria. 9 RCTs used vitamin E alone, and 10 combined vitamin E with other vitamins or minerals. 16 RCTs were placebo- controlled. Vitamin E dose varied between 16.5 and 2000 lU/d. Overall, vitamin E supplementation did not affect all-cause mortality (Table). Results differed between low-dose (< 400 IUId) and high-dose (≥ 400 IUId) trials: Mortality was not increased in 8 RCTs evaluating low-dose vitamin E, while high-dose vitamin E was associated with increased mortality (11 RCTs) (Table). A dose- response analysis showed all-cause mortality increased as vitamin E dose increased > 150 IU/d. The effect of vitamin E did not change after adjustment for differences in sex, mean age, or mean follow- up. The association of high-dose vitamin E and mortality was stronger after adjustment for concomitant use of other vitamins and minerals (pooled relative risk 1.06, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.11; risk difference 63 per 10 000 persons, CI 6 to 119).
High (≥ 400 IU/d), low (< 400 lU/d), and all doses of vitamin E supplementation vs placebo or no vitamin E for all-cause mortality*
CONCLUSIONS
High-dose (≥ 400 IU/d) vitamin E supplementation is associated with increased risk for all-cause mortality. A dose- response relation exists between mortality and vitamin E doses > 150IU/d.
Source of funding: In part, institute de Salud Carlos III.
For correspondence: Dr. E. R. Miller III, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD, USA. E-mailermiller@jhmi.edu.
COMMENTARY
On June 8, 1946, a letter was published in Nature on the benefits of vitamin E for heart disease (1). In response to extensive press coverage, an editorial appeared in JAMA later that month cautioning, "The reported discovery of new and almost miraculous powers of vitamin E needs careful evaluation and confirmation..." (2). Initially it was theorized that the beneficial effects of vitamin E on the heart might derive from its antithrombin or vasodilatory properties. The modern observation that oxidatively modified, low- density lipoprotein cholesterol promotes atherosclerosis led to renewed interest in vitamin E as an antioxidant.
The review by Miller and colleagues is the fifth meta-analysis or comprehensive review of the clinical trial evidence on vitamin E in the recent past (3-6). These reviews have differed somewhat (e.g., only analyzing trials enrolling ≥ 1000 patients [3] or evaluating primary coronary heart disease [CHD] prevention studies separately from secondary CHD prevention studies [4]), but have reached a similar conclusion: Vitamin E supplementation does not decrease the risk for CHD events.
Unlike the other reviews, Miller and colleagues chose to divide the clinical trials by the dose of vitamin E administered, comparing low-dose studies (< 400 lU/d) with high-dose studies (≥ 400 lU/ d). When analyzed in this fashion, vitamin E ≥ 400 lU/d was associated with a 4% relative risk increase in death (about a 0.4% absolute risk increase). Low-dose vitamin E was associated with no increased risk or possibly even a slightly decreased risk for death. Because the meta-analysis pooled studies of persons with or at risk for chronic disease, it is unknown whether the results apply to healthy persons.
While antioxidants remain an important area for research, physicians should focus on proven CHD risk-factor reduction. For at- risk patients who are determined to use vitamin E, keeping the dose below 150 lU/d would be prudent.
Joel A. Simon, MD, MPH
San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center
University of California, San Francisco
San Francisco, California, USA
References
1. Vogelsang A, Shute EV. Nature. 1946; 157:772.
2. Vitamin E and heart disease [Editorial]. JAMA. 1946;!31:746.
3. Vivekananthan DP, Penn MS, Sapp SK, Hsu A, Topol EJ. Lancet. 2003;361:2017-23.
4. Shekelle PG, Morton SC, Jungvig LK, et al. J Gen Intern Med. 2004;19:380-9.
5. Eidelman RS, Hollar D, Hebert PR, Lamas GA, Hennekens CH. Arch Intern Med. 2004; 164:1552-6.
6. Morris CD, Carson S. Ann Intern Med. 2003;139:56-70.
Copyright American College of Physicians Jul/Aug 2005
Source: ACP Journal Club
Related Articles
- Lack Of Vitamin D Could Increase Risk Of Colds, Flu
- Study: Vitamin D Reduces Death Risk
- Study: Vitamin D Lowers Cancer Risk
- Study: Vitamin D Reduces Cancer Risk
- We Pay When We Shun the Sun: Those Rays Provide Vitamin D, Which Cuts Risk of Certain Cancers, Studies Say.
- Vitamin D Can Halve Risk of Some Cancers, Claims Study
- Vitamin D Could Cut Risk of Cancer By Half
- Sunshine Vitamin 'Cuts Cancer Risk'
- Dear Pharmacist: Vitamins May Reduce Risk of Prostate Cancer
- Overview of the Proceedings From Experimental Biology 2004 Symposium: Vitamin D Insufficiency: A Significant Risk Factor in Chronic Diseases and Potential Disease-Specific Biomarkers of Vitamin D Sufficiency1
User Comments (0)

RSS Feeds