SEC Files, Settles Charges Against Five Former CryoLife Employees, Three Wives
Posted on: Friday, 16 September 2005, 21:00 CDT
Sep. 16--The Securities and Exchange Commission said Thursday it had filed and settled illegal insider trading charges against five former CryoLife employees and three of their wives related to a government recall of company products.
The Kennesaw-based company is a major supplier of surgical human transplant tissue.
On Aug. 14, 2002, the Food and Drug Administration ordered the company to halt shipments of some tissue because of contamination fears. According to the SEC, all the defendants -- most of them in sales -- knew in advance of the public that the FDA was about to put a nationwide hold on the shipments.
The SEC said the defendants sold their shares in the company at prices ranging from $9.20 to $9.41 before the recall problem became public.
When the FDA recall was announced by the company, its share price fell to $5.50 from $9.46, a drop of 42 percent. The next day, it fell even more, to $2.03 a share.
The SEC, in two separate actions filed in New York federal district court, said the defendants cumulatively avoided losses totaling $193,156.
Ashley Lee, executive vice president and chief financial officer of CryoLife, said Thursday the company had not received a copy of the SEC action. He also said the action does not involve the company itself.
Without admitting or denying the allegations, the six defendants in one case agreed to pay back $136,334, as well as interest of $19,583 and an unspecified penalty. They also agreed to be permanently enjoined from engaging in future violations.
They are Rodney R. Drinen of Phoenix; Gerald R. Holmes of Blue Springs, Mo., and his wife, Nancy; Thomas P. McHugh of Hollis, N.H.; and Prescott B. Nash of Englewood, Colo., and his wife, Christina.
In a separate action, James J. Farley, a former salesman, and his wife, Shelley, of Medford, N.J., also agreed, without admitting or denying the allegations, to a final judgment enjoining them from future violations. The SEC said it was seeking $56,832 for the losses they allegedly avoided, as well as interest and civil penalties.
-----
To see more of The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, or to subscribe to the newspaper, go to http://www.ajc.com.
Copyright (c) 2005, The Atlanta Journal-Constitution
Distributed by Knight Ridder/Tribune Business News.
For information on republishing this content, contact us at (800) 661-2511 (U.S.), (213) 237-4914 (worldwide), fax (213) 237-6515, or e-mail reprints@krtinfo.com.
CRY,
Source: The Atlanta Journal and Constitution
Related Articles
- Liquidation Outlet recalls action figures
- Defendants Agree to $600,000 Consent Judgment in Counterfeit FINAL FANTASY Merchandise Lawsuit
- Defending Cyberspace: Recommendations for Action
- Merge Healthcare Announces the Execution of an Agreement in Principle Regarding the Settlement of Its Derivative Action
- Immigration Policy Draws Deep Lines Among Lawmakers: Just in GOP, Few Agree on a Best Action
- Reading Packer Agrees to Recall of Beef Patties
- WellPoint Agrees to Class-Action Settlement
- Graco recalls 1.1 million baby strollers--CPSC
- U.S. Issues Recall for Segway Scooters
- Segway Recalled Over Safety Concerns
User Comments (0)

RSS Feeds