October 8, 2005
Different Routes of Progesterone Administration and Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: A Review of the Literature
By Unfer, Vittorio; Casini, Maria Luisa; Marelli, Guido; Costabile, Loredana; Et al
AbstractPolycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is a common endocrine disorder in woman of reproductive age. Although extensive studies have been performed in past decades to investigate the pathobiological mechanisms underlying the unset of this disease, its etiology remains unknown. Progesterone is a hormone of paramount importance in ovulation, implantation and luteal phase support. Low levels of progesterone have been found in the early luteal phase in PCOS patients. Granulosa cells from polycystic ovaries show an altered progesterone production. Moreover, the lack of cyclical exposure to progesterone may have a role in the development of the gonadotropin and androgen abnormalities found in PCOS patients. Ovulation failure and progesterone deficiency may facilitate the hypothalamic- pituitary abnormalities causing the associated disordered luteinizing hormone secretion in PCOS. Progesterone may be administered to PCOS patients in the following cases: to induce withdrawal bleeding, to suppress secretion of luteinizing hormone, in ovulation induction in clomiphene citrate-resistant patients and in luteal phase support in assisted reproduction. We discuss the pharmacologie characteristics of the different routes of progesterone administration with reference to these diverse indications, the therapeutic objectives and patient compliance.
Keywords: Polycystic ovary syndrome, progesterone pharmacology, luteal phase support
Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is one of the most common endocrine disorders in women of reproductive age [1-3]. Although extensive studies have been performed in past decades to investigate the pathobiological mechanisms underlying the unset of this disease, its etiology remains unknown .
Progesterone plays an important role in ovulation [5,6], in embryo implantation and in luteal phase support [7-1O]. Increasing evidence also indicates that human parturition is initiated by decreased myometrial responsiveness to progesterone, i.e., functional progesterone withdrawal [11-13]. Moreover, we know that the incidence of anovulation and miscarriage in PCOS patients is high . Low levels of progesterone have been found in the early luteal phase in PCOS patients [15,16]. Granulosa cells from polycystic ovaries demonstrate an altered ability to synthesize progesterone both in vivo and in vitro .
The lack of cyclical exposure to progesterone has been suggested to have a role in the development of the gonadotropin/androgen synthesis alterations found in PCOS patients . Ovulation failure and progesterone deficiency may facilitate the development of the hypothalamic-pituitary abnormalities that determine the altered lutcinizing hormone (LH) secretion which is characteristic of PCOS . Moreover, adults with PCOS require higher progesterone concentrations to inhibit the gonadotropinreleasing hormone (GnRH) (LH) pulse frequency compared with normal women. This contributes to establishment of the persistently rapid GnRH pulses and elevated LH levels found in PCOS .
All these findings may explain the presence of anovulation, the delay in conception and the high prevalence of miscarriage that occur in PCOS patients . Moreover, they also reveal the reason why PCOS patients undergoing assisted reproductive techniques represent a great challenge for the fertility specialist . Considering everything mentioned above, in these patients progesterone supplementation in in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles is highly recommended for achieving a successful pregnancy .
An impaired adrenal function is a common characteristic of patients with PCOS [2O]. Consequently, basal androgen and 17ot- hydroxy-progesterone (17-OHP) levels are routinely measured for the hormonal evaluation of suspected PCOS women [21,22]. Androgen levels are generally determined to establish the presence of hyperandrogenemia whereas basal 17-OHP levels are determined to screen for 21-hydroxylase-deficient non-classic adrenal hyperplasia . Generally, to maintain sampling uniformity and avoid increases in 17-OHP levels due to corpus luteum function, these levels are obtained during the follicular phase. However, since most hyperandrogenic patients are oligomenorrheic, it is frequently necessary to administer a progestogen to induce the withdrawal bleeding and properly time the blood sampling . Progestogens such as medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) are commonly used to induce withdrawal bleeding in PCOS patients . Recent studies have shown that the administration of progesterone to women with PCOS results in a temporary, although clinically relevant, suppression of circulating androgen levels, which is significantly higher than the one achieved by MPA [22,24]. These observations may favor the use of progesterone to induce withdrawal bleeding in these patients.
Undoubtedly, the treatment of anovulatory PCOS patients who are resistant to clomiphene citrate (CC) is challenging for the fertility specialist. The administration of progesterone before CC therapy has been effective in inducing the responsiveness to CC [25,26] due to the progesterone-related suppression of follicle- stimulating hormone (FSH) and LH secretion.
In summary, in clinical practice we may administer progesterone to PCOS patients in the following cases:
(1) To induce withdrawal bleeding;
(2) To suppress LH secretion in the normalization of the menstrual cycle;
(3) In ovulation induction in CC-resistant patients;
(4) To support the luteal phase after assisted reproductive techniques.
In the present review we discuss the pharmacologie characteristics of the different routes of administration with reference to these diverse indications, the therapeutic objectives and patient compliance.
Different routes of administration of progesterone and its pharmaceutical form
Once the therapeutic need for progesterone has been established, the question is which route of administration should be preferred [27,28]. In general, the route of administration of a drug is chosen on the basis of appropriate anatomic, physiopathologic and pharmacotherapeutic considerations [28,29] rather than practical aspects or even patient compliance. However, it is important to mention that from a pharmacological point of view the main factors that determine the success of absorption of a drug from the administration site are three:
(1) The pharmaceutical form (tablets, suppositories, gel, solution for injection, etc.);
(2) The solubility of the drug at the tissue level;
(3) The hematic now at the tissue level.
As regards therapy with progesterone, all possible administration routes have been used with distinct results.
Transdermal route of administration
The transdermal route of administration would be easy to use because it offers good compliance from the patient. However, it does not permit the achievement of adequate plasma levels of progesterone. In fact, progesterone is a lipophilic compound and is not easily absorbed by the skin [3O]. Considering that the daily production of progesterone is on average 25 mg, using the transdermal route of administration about half of the body should be utilized as absorbing surface . The unsuitability of the transdermal administration of progesterone makes difficult to conceive any viable therapeutic application for progesterone administered by this route.
Rectal route of administration
The rectum presents a complex hematic and lymphatic vascularization. The rectal mucosa is not considered an important site for drug administration due to the great variability of absorption , However, emphasis should be placed on the fact that as many active components are absorbed by the rectal mucosa as by other lipoproteic membranes  and, indeed, non-ionic and lipophylic compounds are absorbed easily by the rectal mucosa . Some authors emphasize that drugs which are easily metabolized by the liver may be more effective when administered by the endorectal route [29,35]. When an active component is absorbed in the lower portion of the rectum, via the inferior hemorrhoidal veins it reaches the general circulation directly, bypassing the hepatic first-pass elimination. On the contrary, if the compounds are absorbed by the superior rectal ampulla, they will reach the portal circulation via the superior hemorrhoidal vein [28,35].
This route of progesterone administration, which still does not have sufficient bibliographic support, is used in some Anglo-Saxon countries for hormone replacement therapy (HRT) in combination with estrogen administration. The plasma peak of progesterone is reached 8 h after administration and is followed by a gradual decline of the plasma levels. As mentioned above, there is a wide variability of absorption among patients that makes the hematic peaks range between 15 and 52 ng/ml after the administration of 100 mg of progesterone . This variability in absorption makes difficult to conceive the practical utility of progesterone administration by this route to PCOS patients in any of the previously mentioned therapeutic targets.
Sublingual route of administration
Few studies have been performed on administration of progesterone by the sublingual route [37-39]. In 1996 Stovall and collaborators  used this route of progesterone administration for luteal phas\e support in patients undergoing embryo transfer. The authors demonstrated that, after the administration of 50 or 100 mg of progesterone dissolved in 1 ml of sublingual suspension, the plasma peaks were reached in 30-60 min and levels were on average 17.61 3.78 ng/ml when 100 mg progesterone was administered. However, the maintenance of adequate plasma concentrations through the day required the administration to be repeated two or three times. Preliminary data of the Iowa Assisted Reproduction Program showed that 400 mg of progesterone has to be administered sublingually every 8 h to obtain plasma levels similar to those achieved with intramuscular administration of 100 mg progesterone/day [4O]. Further studies are necessary in order to evaluate the effectiveness of progesterone administration by this route, and hence its potential role in the therapy of PCOS patients.
Transnasal route of administration
Nasal mucosa represents a potential site for progesterone administration due to its high vascularization and the presence of microvilli that expand the absorbing area considerably [41,42]. Such a route of administration was proposed by Steege and co-workers in 1986, and in 1993 Cicinelli and associates evaluated the possibility of progesterone administration through nasal spray [43-46]. The results of this study were very interesting, although the plasma levels achieved did not permit therapeutic effectiveness to be reached in clinical obstetrics and hence in PCOS. This route of administration could be proposed for HRT in menopause .
Intrauterine route of administration
The intrauterine route of administration consists of the application of an intrauterine device and is of particular interest in contraception and pre-menopause . Clearly, it cannot be proposed in obstetrics because it would act as a contraceptive . Like for the transnasal route of administration, in this case we also do not reach adequate plasma levels of hormone to propose this route of progesterone administration in any of the therapeutic targets in PCOS mentioned above.
Oral route of administration
The oral route of progesterone administration offers high compliance for the patient even though it presents evident disadvantages. First of all, there is a great variability of absorption depending on individual factors and gastric filling [50,51]. Moreover, oral progesterone shows poor bioavailability  and a rapid clearance rate .
Progesterone administered by the oral route is first absorbed at the intestinal level and then reaches the liver, passing through the portal vein where it is rapidly converted into metabolites. This enterohepatic passage determines important side-effects such as dizziness, sleepiness, nausea, etc.  caused by the formation of these metabolites. In addition, due to the rapid metabolism, plasma levels of oral progesterone tend to be relatively low. Consequently, to reach plasmatic levels that are adequate for an effective therapeutic action, it is necessary to administer high and repeated dosages of progesterone during the day [54,55]. Unfortunately, this makes plasma levels of progesterone metabolites rise further. Therefore, considering the previously mentioned issues, the development of a progesteronecontaining drug that could pass throughout the gastric barrier and release the active component at the intestinal level may be advantageous. Consecutive dosages could be reduced in number and also side-effects will occur less frequently.
In recent years an oral micronized preparation of progesterone has become available on the market. This formulation leads to a higher absorption of the active component [52,56] in comparison with the classical oral formulation. The production of micronized progesterone requires transformation of the chemical compound into very fine powder that in turn has to be suspended in an oil vector, a process that may considerably increase its bioavailability . Notwithstanding the process of micronization, the intestinal absorption of progesterone is still limited. Moreover, considerable inter-subject variability in the extent of progesterone absorbed after administration of oral micronized progesterone is still present [50,51]. The absorption of oral micronized progesterone is doubled in the presence of food. However, the bioavailability of oral micronized progesterone is approximately 10% compared with intramuscular progesterone .
Oral micronized progesterone has been administered in IVF for luteal phase support. Studies demonstrated that oral progesterone is associated with a significantly lower implantation rate per embryo compared with intramuscular progesterone in luteal phase support in IVF cycles [58,59]. This difference was observed despite the fact that circulating levels of progesterone were similar in both groups. Buvat and colleagues  demonstrated that use of oral micronized progesterone in oil (100 mg at 08.00, 100 mg at 12.00 and 200 mg at 20.00 hours) resulted in a clinical pregnancy rate of 23% and an implantation rate per embryo of 7.5%, compared with 45% and 19%, respectively, for intramuscular progesterone. All these differences were statistically significant. However, Pouly and collaborators  reported that oral progesterone (100 mg in the morning and 200 mg in the evening) resulted in a clinical pregnancy rate of 25% and an implantation rate of 29.9%, compared with 28.8% and 35.3%, respectively, for progesterone vaginal gel. This difference was not statistically significant.
We know that the rapid metabolism of oral progesterone leads to a high concentration of circulating metabolites, including deoxycorticosterone, estrone and estradiol. The most common metabolites, the 5α- and 5β-reduced pregnanolone, are present in concentrations higher than that of progesterone itself [61,62]. The metabolites of progesterone, being highly concentrated, may bind progesterone receptors and interfere with the normal action of the hormone. Moreover, the 5α- and 5β-reduced pregnanolone are known to have a high affinity for γ- aminobutyric acid receptors . These receptors are present in the reproductive organs  and their activation may adversely effect the outcome of pregnancy.
The clearance of orally administered progesterone has been studied by Whitehead and co-workers  in five postmenopausal women. Progesterone 100 mg/day was administered orally for five consecutive days. Progesterone represents an important metabolic step in the biosynthesis of many steroids, including some glucocorticoids and mineralocorticoids. The transformation of exogenous progesterone into other hormones with diverse biological activity represents a limit in clinical practice. Circulating progesterone may be converted into deoxycorticosterone at peripheral tissue level; the extra-adrenal synthesis of this potent mineralocorticoid from endogenous and exogenous progesterone has been well documented [66-68].
Progesterone is widely metabolized at the intestinal and hepatic level by the reduction of the C-3 and C-20 carbonyl groups; by reduction of the C-4 to C-5 double bond; by hydroxylation at C-16 to C-21; and by conjugation with glucuronic and sulfuric acids . Progesterone may compete with mineralocorticoids at the receptor level, thus acting as a mineralocorticoid antagonist [70-72]. Unfortunately, a conspicuous amount of progesterone is converted to deoxycorticosterone .
During the menstrual cycle in women of reproductive age, progesterone and deoxycorticosterone levels rise concomitantly, reaching a maximum concentration during the luteal phase . In women during the follicular phase and in men, circulating deoxycorticosterone is produced by the adrenal cortex. On the other hand, during the luteal phase more than 75% of the circulating deoxycorticosterone comes from the peripheral conversion of progesterone [66,67]. The exogenous administration of progesterone is followed by a rapid increase of plasma deoxycorticosterone levels, and the route of progesterone administration may influence the progesterone/deoxycorticosterone ratio. The effects of mineralocorticoids and of deoxycorticosterone are partly antagonized by the antimineralocorticoid effects of progesterone itself. One may hypothesize that some clinical manifestations, i.e., premenstrual syndrome, pregnancy-related edema as well as hypertensive disorders in pregnancy, could be linked to the alterations of the progesterone/ deoxycorticosterone ratio.
In conclusion, the oral administration of progesterone offers high compliance even though the associated inconveniences should be taken into consideration, especially in those indications where the administration of this hormone has to be protracted . Conversely, where we need a short therapy, oral progesterone could be preferred to intramuscular administration. For example, this route of progesterone administration could be indicated to induce bleeding in PCOS oligomenorrheic patients, where progesterone is more effective than MPA in suppressing circulating androgen levels [22,24].
Vaginal route of administration
The vaginal route of progesterone administration provides many advantages such as lack of local pain, avoidance of first-pass hepatic metabolism and rapid absorption. However, this route of administration results in localization of the bioavailability of the active component at endometrial level [74-77]; consequently, this route of progesterone administration does not permit high plasma levels of the hormone to be reached.
Recently progesterone has been formulated in bioadhesive gel preparations. These preparations elicit better compliance compared with cream formulations and suppositories, which are known to cause uncomfortable vaginal discharges and consequently an irregular absorption of the active component . Studies comparing intramuscular and vaginal progesterone in \inducing a secretory transformation of the endometrium have led to controversial results regarding the superiority of one or the other .
As stated above, vaginal administration of progesterone results in high concentration of the hormone at the uterine level (first uterine passage). This may represent an advantage for certain indications such as HRT [80,81]. After the estrogenic stimulation, in HRT the aim is to provoke the secretive transformation of the endometrium to avoid the adverse effects of estrogen at endometrial level. This effect may not be adequate/advisable in other therapeutic indications. For example, in luteal phase support after assisted reproduction, the vaginal administration of progesterone results in a lower pregnancy rate in comparison to intramuscular progesterone [82,83]. In fact, in assisted reproduction the secretive transformation of the endometrium has to be synchronous in all its tissue components. This does not occur if progesterone is administered vaginally .
The rational behind these clinical findings may be easily understood if one considers that implantation of the conceptus may only occur with a balancing of permitting and blocking factors . These factors are hormone-dependent in the sense that circulating levels of the single hormone may both induce and inhibit the synthesis of these factors, depending on the concentration of the hormone itself. That is to say, progesterone may act either towards implantation as a permissive factor in a certain range of concentration or as a blocking factor when its concentrations are lower or higher than a cut-off value [86,87]. This is evident if we remember that the first contraceptive used in therapy was a high- dosage progesterone preparation. However, some studies have not found statistically significant differences in terms of pregnancy rates in patients undergoing IVF where luteal phase support was given by either intramuscular or vaginal progesterone [88-9O].
Intramuscular route of administration
The intramuscular route of progesterone administration is the one most commonly used for this hormone in clinical practice. With reference to the pharmacokinetics of intramuscular progesterone, the definition 'intramuscular route of administration' should be substituted with 'intergluteal route of administration'. It has been shown that when progesterone is administered by an injection into the gluteus, its half-life is significantly longer than when the hormone is injected into the superior part of the arm . This difference may be determined by the different concentrations of adipose cells between the arm and gluteus: in fact, progesterone shows a high affinity for adipose cells. Consequently, after administration of the hormone into the gluteus, progesterone is stored in adipose cells and released only when the plasma levels decrease. This effect may be denned as a depot effect of progesterone, which permits a singular daily administration of the hormone even though progesterone's half-life in the blood is extremely short (5-20 min) .
Unfortunately, the intramuscular administration of progesterone causes pain at the site of injection, sometimes the formation of a bruise and, in rare cases, sterile abscess . On the other hand, intramuscular administration is the only route that guarantees adequate and verifiable plasma levels of the active component. It is clear that in assisted reproduction, and in therapy to reduce the threat of abortion and the risk of preterm labor, patients tolerate the discomfort related with the therapy because of their high level of motivation . Conversely, this route of administration does not seem to be recommended in menopause, where the vaginal route seems to be equally effective and more tolerated by the patient.
In conclusion, for all the reason mentioned above concerning the intramuscular route of progesterone administration, this should be preferred in the treatment of PCOS patients in the case of CC resistance in ovulation induction and, obviously, for luteal phase support after assisted reproduction.
Studies of progesterone use in polycystic ovary syndrome
As mentioned in the Introduction, it has been suggested that the lack of cyclical exposure to progesterone may play an important role in the development of gonadotropin and androgen abnormalities in PCOS . Furthermore, progesterone may also be involved in PCOS- associated anovulation and miscarriage .
It is known that an increment in LH level is a typical finding in PCOS patients. This unsuitable elevation of LH is suspected to adversely influence follicular development and ovulation. In the study of Buckler and associates , progesterone was administered because of its suppressive action on LH secretion (if progesterone is administered continuously in physiological dosages). Ten PCOS patients were treated with vaginal progesterone 100 mg twice a day for 10 days. Mean serum progesterone levels reached 16 ng/ml 4 days after the treatment and remained in the mid-luteal phase range thereafter. The mean serum LH concentrations decreased significantly (p ^ 0.01) after 8 days of treatment and continued to fall progressively until the end of progesterone administration. In another study of Pastor and collaborators , LH levels were normalized when progesterone vaginal suppository and transdermal estradiol were administered, reaching plasma progesterone concentrations of 13-15 ng/ml. These results are in contrast to those of other studies in which the administration of vaginal progesterone did not permit the achievement of high and stable plasma levels of progesterone [79,81,96]. In conclusion, although further studies should be undertaken before assessing a definitive therapeutic role of exogenous administration of progesterone in PCOS, the possibility to normalize LH levels in PCOS patients with progesterone administration has been found effective.
Table I. Summary of the possible therapeutic approaches in the treatment of patients with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) in relation to the diverse indications in which progesterone could be used.
Progesterone plays an important role in oocyte fertilization and embryo implantation. Therefore, when performing assisted reproduction in PCOS patients, progesterone supplementation in these patients is highly recommended in order to achieve a successful pregnancy [18,19,97], Since the most reliable and stable plasma levels are achieved only with the intramuscular route of administration, treatment with intramuscular progesterone at a dosage of 50 mg/day from the beginning to the 12th week of gestation is suggested.
Progesterone can also be used in ovulation induction in PCOS patients who have been found to be CC-resistant. The pretreatment with progesterone results in suppression of the secretion of FSH and LH, which in turn restores the responsiveness to the estrogenic treatment [25,26]. Ten PCOS women previously found to be CC- resistant were administered 50 mg progesterone intramuscularly for 5 days. After the treatment, in seven of these women LH and FSH levels fell. Consequently, the responsiveness to CC was restored and three of the seven women conceived in the first treatment cycle. The women in whom LH levels were not suppressed remained unresponsive to CC.
Regarding the induction of bleeding in PCOS oligomenorrheic patients, we have reported the results of some studies showing that the use of progesterone to induce withdrawal bleeding results in a temporary although clinically relevant suppression in circulating androgen levels [22,24] which is significantly higher than the one provoked by MPA. These observations may favor the use of progesterone to induce withdrawal bleeding. For this indication the best route of administration may be the oral one (100 mg in the morning and 200 mg before bedtime for 7 days).
Table I summarizes the therapeutic approaches in PCOS patients.
The production of progesterone in PCOS patients is often inadequate. This impairment has been correlated not only with occurrence of anovulatory cycles, but also to the reduced ability of granulosa cells to synthesize progesterone .
The lack of cyclical exposure to progesterone has been suggested to have a role in the development of alterations in the synthesis of gonadotropins and androgens found in PCOS . The deficiency in progesterone production and ovulation failure may facilitate the development of the hypothalamic-pituitary alterations that in turn provokes the alteration in LH secretion which is typical of PCOS . PCOS patients require higher progesterone concentrations to inhibit the GnRH (LH) pulse frequency in comparison to normal women.
In conclusion, the use of progesterone in PCOS patients may have different therapeutic objectives. As shown in the present review, the different routes of administration as well as its pharmaceutical form strongly modify the bioavailability and metabolism of progesterone. Hence its therapeutic effects may show a significant difference and this in consequence may affect the possibility of the occurrence of side-effects.
We may conclude by saying that the choice of the modality of progesterone administration has to work with the therapeutic objectives. Consequently, this choice should be guided by the patient's compliance only if the therapeutic options in terms of administration route and pharmaceutical form lead to the same desired efficacy of treatment.
We would like to thank Dr Suzette Paolella for her valuable support.
1. Goudas VT, Dumesic DA. Polycystic ovary syndrome. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 1997;26:893-912.
2. Ovalle F, Azziz R. Insulin resistance, polycystic ovary syndrome, and type 2 diabetes mcllitus. Fcrtil Steril 2002;77:1095- 1105.
3. Azziz R. PCOS: a diagnostic challenge. Reprod Biomed Online 2004;8:644-648.
4. Strauss JF 3rd. Some new thoughts on the path\ophysiology and genetics of polycystic ovary syndrome. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2003;997:42- 48.
5. Fiad TM, Cunningham SK, McKcnna TJ. Role of P deficiency in the development of luteinizing hormone and androgen abnormalities in polycystic ovary syndrome. Eur J Endocrinol 1996; 135:335-339.
6. Doldi N, Gessi A, Dcstcfani A, Calzi F, Ferrari A. Polycystic ovary syndrome: anomalies in progesterone production. Hum Reprod 1998; 13:290-293.
7. Ludwig M, Diedrich K. Evaluation of an optimal luteal phase support protocol in IVF. Acta Obstet Gynccol Scand 2001;80:452-466.
8. Bagchi IC, Li Q, Cheon YP. Role of steroid hormone-regulated genes in implantation. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2001;943:68-76.
9. Cavagna M, Mantcsc JC. Biomarkers of cndometrial receptivity - a review. Placenta 2003;24(Suppl B):S39-S47.
10. Posaci C, Smitz J, Camus M, Osmanagaoglu K, Devroey P. Progesterone for the luteal support of assisted reproductive technologies: clinical options. Hum Reprod 2000;15(Suppl 1): 129- 148.
11. Mcsiano S. Myometrial progesterone rcsponsiveness and the control of human parturition. J Soc Gynecol Investig 2004;11:193- 202.
12. Madsen G, Zakar T, Ku CY, Sanborn BM, Smith R, Mesiano S. Prostaglandins differentially modulate progesterone receptor-A and - B expression in human myometrial cells: evidence for prostaglandin- induccd functional progesterone withdrawal. J Clin Endocrinol Mctab 2004;89:1010-1013.
13. Nculcn J, Brcckwoldt M. Placental progesterone, prostaglandins and mechanisms leading to initiation of parturition in the human. Exp Clin Endocrinol 1994:102:195-202.
14. Franks S, Roberts R, Hardy K. Gonadotrophin regimens and oocytc quality in women with polycystic ovaries. Reprod Biomed Online 2003:6:181-184.
15. Joseph-Home R, Mason H, Batty S, White D, Hillier S, Urquhart M, Franks S. Luteal phase progesterone excretion in ovulatory women with polycystic ovaries. Hum Reprod 2002;17:1459-1463.
16. Fleming R, McQueen D, Yatcs RW, Courts JR. Spontaneous follicular and luteal function in infertile women with oligomenorrhoea: role of luteinizing hormone. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 1995:43:735-739.
17. Chhabra S, McCartney CR, Yoo RY, Eaglcson CA, Chang RJ, Marshall JC. Progesterone inhibition of the hypothalamic gonadotropin-relcasing hormone pulse generator: evidence for varied effects in hypcrandrogcncmic adolescent girls. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2005;90:2810-2815.
18. Doldi N, Marsiglio E, Destefani A, Gessi A, Mcrati G, Ferrari A. Elevated serum progesterone on the day of HCG administration in IVF is associated with a higher pregnancy rate in polycystic ovary syndrome. Hum Reprod 1999; 14:601-605.
19. Dale PO, Tanbo T, Abyholm T. In-wtro fertilization in infertile women with the polycystic ovarian syndrome. Hum Reprod 1991;6:238-241.
20. Luboshitzky R, Ishai A, Shen-Or Z, Herer P. Evaluation of the pituitary-adrenal axis in hypcrandrogenic women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Neurocndocrinol Lett 2003;24:249-254.
21. Chang RJ. Polycystic ovaries in 2001:physiology and treatment. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) 2002;31:IS 15-1S19.
22. Woods KS, Reyna R, Azziz R. Effect of oral micronizcd progesterone on androgen levels in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Fertil Steril 2002:77:1125-1127.
23. Azziz R. The time has come to simplify the evaluation of the hirsute patient. Fcrtil Steril 2000;74:870-872.
24. Anttila L, Koskinen P, Erkkola R, Irjala K, Ruutiainen K. Serum testosterone, androstcncdione and lutcinizing hormone levels after short-term mcdroxyprogcstcrone acetate treatment in women with polycystic ovarian disease. Acta Obstet Gynccol Scand 1994;73:634- 636.
25. Homburg R, Weissglas L, Goldman J. Improved treatment for anovulation in polycystic ovarian disease utilizing the effect of progesterone on the inappropriate gonadotrophin release and clomiphcnc response. Hum Reprod 1988;3:285-288.
26. Dale PO, Tanbo T, Kjckshus E, Abyholm T. Pregnancy after transfer of cryoprcserved embryos in clomiphcne citrate resistant polycystic ovarian syndrome. Fertil Steril 1990;53:362-364.
27. Fotherby K. Bioavailability of orally administered sex steroids used in oral contraception and hormone replacement therapy. Contraception 1996;54:59-69.
28. Ritschcl WA. Targeting in the gastrointestinal tract: new approaches. Methods Find Exp CUn Pharmacol 1991;13:313-336.
29. Gibaldi M, Boycs RN, Feldman S. Influence of first-pass effect on availability of drugs on oral administration. J Pharm Sci 1971;60:1338-1340.
30. Bercovici JP, Darragon T. Administration route of natural sex steroids (estradiol, progesterone, testosterone). Nouv Presse Med 1980;9:179-183.
31. Mauvais-Jarvis P, Kuttcnn F, Wright F. La progesterone administre par voie percutane. Ann Endocrinol (Paris) 1975;36:56- 62.
32. Gladtke E, von Hattingberg HM. Problems of rectal application of drugs. Dtsch Mcd Wochenschr 1970;95:1494-1496.
33. Muranishi S. Characteristics of drug absorption via the rectal route. Methods Find Exp Clin Pharmacol 1984;6:763-772.
34. Corbo DC, Liu JC, Chien YW. Drug absorption through mucosal membranes: effect of mucosal route and penetrant hydrophilicity. Pharm Res 1989;6:848-852.
35. de Boer AG, Moolcnaar F, de Lecdc LG, Breimcr DD. Rectal drug administration: clinical pharmacokinetic considerations. Clin Pharmacokinct 1982;7:285-311.
36. Chakmakjian ZH, Zachariah NY. Bioavailability of progesterone with different modes of administration. J Reprod Med 1987;32:443- 448.
37. Stovall DW, Van Voorhis BJ, Mattingly KL, Sparks AET, Chaplcr FK, Syrop CH. The effectiveness of sublingual progesterone administration during cryopreserved embryo transfer cycles: results of a matched follow-up study. Fcrtil Steril 1996;65:986-991.
38. Miller BE, De Souza MJ, Slade K, Luciano AA. Sublingual administration of micronizcd estradiol and progesterone, with and without micronized testosterone: effect on biochemical markers of bone metabolism and bone mineral density. Menopause 2000;7:318-326.
39. Vaugelade C, Rohmcr AC, Burel F, Belleney J, Duclos R, Buncl C. Progesterone freeze-dried systems in sublingual dosage form. Int J Pharm 2001;229:67-73.
40. Unfer V, Oostabile L, Gerli S, Marelli G. Farmacocinctica e farmacodinamica del progesterone: diverse vie di somministrazionc. In: Il progesterone. Rome: Verduci Editore; 1999. p 21.
41. Cicinelli E, Ragno G, Cagnazzo I, Fanelli F Vetuschi C, Schonauer S. Progesterone administration by nasal spray. Fertil Steril 1991;56:139-141.
42. Wuthrich P, Buri P. The transnasal route of drug administration. Aspects of nasal anatomy and physiology. Pharm Acta HeIv 1989;64:322-331.
43. Steege JF, Rupp SL, Stout AL, Bernhisel M. Bioavailability of nasally administered progesterone. Fertil Steril 1986;46:727729.
44. Cicinelli E, Ragno G, Fanelli F, Vetuschi C, Cantatore FP. Nasally-administered progesterone: comparison of ointment and spray formulation. Maturitas 1991;13:313-317.
45. Cicinelli E, Cignarelli M, Resta L, Scorcia P, Petruzzi D, Santoro G. Effects of the repetitive administration of progesterone by nasal spray in postmenopausal women. Fertil Steril 1993;60:1020- 1024.
46. Cicinelli E, Petruzzi D, Scorcia P, Resta L. Effects of progesterone administered by nasal spray on the human postmenopausal cndomctrium. Maturitas 1993;18:65-72.
47. Wattanakumtornkul S, Pinto AB, Williams DB. Intranasal hormone replacement therapy. Menopause 2003;10:88-98.
48. Williams JK. Contraceptive needs of the perimenopausal woman. Obstct Gynccol Clin North Am 2002;29:575-588.
49. Croxatto HB, Diaz S. The place of progesterone in human contraception. J Steroid Biochem 1987;27:991-994.
50. McAuley JW, Kroboth FJ, Froboth PD. Oral administration of micronized progesterone: a review and more experience. Pharmacotherapy 1996; 16:453-457.
51. Levine H, Watson N. Comparison of the pharmacokmetics of Crinone 8% administered vaginally versus Prometrium administered orally in postmenopausal women. Fertil Steril 2000;73:516-521.
52. Simon JA, Robinson DE, Andrews MC, Hildebrand JR 3rd, Rocci MLJr, Blake RE, Hodgen GD. The absorption of oral micronized progesterone: the effect of food, dose proportionality, and comparison with intramuscular progesterone. Fertil Steril 1993;60:26- 33.
53. Maxson WS, Hargrove JT. Bioavailability of oral micronized progesterone. Fertil Steril 1985:44:622-626.
54. Ottosson UB. Oral progesterone and estrogen/progestogen therapy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1984;27:94-106.
55. Ottoson UB, Carlstrom K, Damber JE, von Schoultz B. Serum levels of progesterone and some of its metabolites including deoxycorticosterone after oral and parentcral administration. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1984;91:1111-1119.
56. Hargrove JT, Maxson WS, Wentz AC. Absorption of oral progesterone is influenced by vehicle and particle size. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989;161:948-951.
57. Chakmakjian ZH, Zachariah NY. Bioavailability of progesterone with different modes of administration. J Reprod Med 1987:32:443- 448.
58. Licciardi FL, Kwiatkowski A, Noyes NL, Berkeley AS, Krey T-I- i Grifo JA. Oral versus intramuscular progesterone for in vitro fertilization: a prospective randomized study. Fertil Steril 1999:71:614-618.
59. Pouly JL, Bassil S, Frydman R, Hedon B, Nicollet B, Prada Y, Antoine JM, Zambrano R, Donnez J. Luteal support after intrim) fertilization: Crinone 8%, a sustained release vaginal progesterone gel, versus Utrogestan, an oral micronized progesterone. Hum Reprod 1996; 11:2085-2089.
60. Buvat J, Marcolin G, Guittard C, Herbaut JC, Louvet AL, Dehaene JL. Luteal support after luteinizing hormone releasing hormone agonist for in vitro fertilization; superiority of human chorionic gonadotropin over oral progesterone. Fertil Steril 1990;53:490-494.
61. Nahoul K, Dehennin L, Jondet M, Roger M. Profiles of plasma cstrogens, progesterone and their metabolites after oral or vaginal administration of estradiol or progesterone. Maturitas 1993;16:185- 202.
62. Vanselow W, Dennerstein L, Greenwood KM, de Lignieres B. Effect of progesterone \and its 5a and 5/
63. Wilson MA. GABA physiology: modulation by benzodiazepines and hormones. Grit Rev Neurobiol 1996; 10:1-17.
64. Perusquia M, Villalon CM. The relaxant effect of sex steroids in rat myometrium is independent of the gamma-amino butyric acid system. Life Sci 1996;58:913-926.
65. Whitehead MI, Townsend PT, Gill DK, Collins WP, Campbell S. Absorption and metabolism of oral progesterone. Br Med J 1980;280:825-827.
66. Antonipillai J, Moghissi E, Hawks D, Schneider T, Horton R. The origin of plasma deoxycorticostcronc in men and in women during the menstrual cycle. J Clin Endocrinol Mctab 1983;56:93-98.
67. casey ML, MacDonald PC. Formation of deoxycorricosterone from progesterone in extraadrenal tissues: demonstration of steroid 21- hydroxylasc activity in human aorta. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1982;55:804-806.
68. Winkel CA, Parker CR Jr, Simpson ER, MacDonald PC. Production rate of deoxycorticosterone in women during follicular and luteal phases of ovarian cycle: the role of extraadrenal 21-hydroxylation of circulation progesterone in deoxycorticosterone production. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1980;51:1354-1358.
69. Adlercreutz H, Martin F. Biliary excretion and intestinal metabolism of progesterone and estrogens in man. J Steroid Biochem 1980;13:231-244.
70. Landau RL, Lugibihl K. Inhibition of the sodium retaining influence of aldosterone by progesterone. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1958;18:1237-1245.
71. Sharp GWG, Komack CL, Leaf A. Studies on the binding of aldosterone in the toad bladder. J Clin Invest 1966;45:450-459.
72. Wambach G, Higgins I. Antimineralocorticoid action of progesterone in the rat: correlation of the effect on electrolyte excretion and interaction with renal mineralocorticoid receptors. Endocrinology 1978;102:1686-1693.
73. Fanchin R, de Ziegler D, Bergeron C, Righini C, Torrisi C, Frydman R. Transvaginal administration of progesterone. Obstet Gynecol 1997;90:396-401.
74. Von Eye Corleta H, Capp E, Cardoso Ferreira MB. Pharmacokinetics of natural progesterone vaginal suppository. Gynecol Obstet Invest 2004;58:105-108.
75. Alam V, Vega M, Risquez F. Luteal phase support. Reprod Biomed Online 2001;3:250-262.
76. Weckstein LN, Jacobson A, Galen D, Hampton K, Ivani K, Andres J. Improvement of pregnancy rates with oocytes donation in older recipients with the addition of progesterone vaginal suppositories. Fertl Steril 1993;60:573-575.
77. Maddocks S, Hahn P, Moller F, Reid RL. A double-blind placebo- controlled trial of progesterone vaginal suppositories in the treatment of premenstrual syndrome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1986;154:573- 581.
78. Kalund-Jensen H, Myren CJ. Vaginal absorption of oestradiol and progesterone. Maruritas 1984;6:359-367.
79. Tavaniotou A, Smitz J, Bourgain C, Devroey P. Comparison between different routes of progesterone administration as luteal phase support in infertility treatments. Hum Reprod Update 2000;6:139-148.
80. Cicinelli E, Borraccino V, Petruzzi D, Mazzotta N, Cerundolo ML, Schonauer LM. Pharmacokinetics and endometrial effects of the vaginal administration of micronized progesterone in an oil-based solution to postmenopausal women. Fertil Steril 1996;65:860-862.
81. Norman TR, Morse C, Dennerstein L. Comparative bioavailability of orally and vaginally administered progesterone. Fertil Steril 1991;56:1034-1039.
82. Perino M, Brigandi FG, Abate FG, Costabile L, Balzano E, Abate A. Intramuscular versus vaginal progesterone in assisted reproduction: a comparative study. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol 1997;24:228-231.
83. Abate A, Perino M, Abate FG, Brigandi A, Costabile L, Mann F. Intramuscular versus vaginal administration of progesterone for luteal phase support after in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer. A comparative randomized study. CHn Exp Obstet Gynecol 1999;26:203-206.
84. Sauer MV, Stein AL, Paulson RJ, Moycr DL. Endometrial responses to various hormone replacement regimens in ovarian failure patients preparing for embryo donation. Int J Gynecol Obstct 1991;35:61-68.
85. Archer DF, Fahy GE, Viniegra-Sibal A, Anderson FD, Snipes W, Foldesy RG. Initial and steady-state pharmacokinetics of a vaginally administered formulation of progesterone. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995;173:471-477.
86. Villanueva B, Casper RF, Yen SCS. Intravaginal administration of progesterone enhanced absorption after estrogen treatment. Fertil Steril 1981;35:433-437.
87. Erny R, Simoncini C, Chastclliere N, de Lignres B. Variation de la progesterone plasmatiquc induites par l'administration vaginale d'Utrogcstan. J Gynecol Biol Reprod 1989; 18:229-234.
88. Penzias AS, Alpcr MM. Luteal suppon with vaginal micronized progesterone gel in assisted reproduction. Reprod Biomed Online 2003;6:287-295.
89. Anserini P, Costa M, Remorgida V, Sarli R, Guglielminetti E, Ragni N. Luteal phase suppon in assisted reproductive cycles using cither vaginal (Crinonc 8) or intramuscular (Prontogcst) progesterone: results of a prospective randomized study. Minerva Ginecol 2001;53:297-301.
90. Lightman A, KoI S, Itskovitz-Eldor J. A prospective randomized study comparing intramuscular with intravaginal natural progesterone in programmed thaw cycles. Hum Reprod 1999; 14:2596- 2599.
91. Can KJ. ABC of endocrinology. I. Hormones in general. Lancet 1970; 1:763-765.
92. Smitz J, Devroey P, Fagucr B, Bourgain C, Camus M, Van Stcrteghem AC. A prospective randomized comparison of intramuscular or intravaginal natural progesterone as a lutcal phase and early pregnancy supplement. Hum Reprod 1992;7:168-175.
93. Nillius SJ, Johansson EDB. Plasma progesterone levels after intramuscular or rectal administration of progesterone. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1971;50:46.
94. Buckler HM, Bangah M, Healy DL, Burger HG. Vaginal progesterone administration in physiological doses normalizes raised luteinizing hormone levels in patients with polycystic ovarian syndrome. Gynecol Endocrinol 1992;6:275-282.
95. Pastor CL, Griffin-Korf ML, Aloi JA, Evans WS, Marshall JC. Polycystic ovary syndrome: evidence for reduced sensitivity of the gonadotropin-releasing hormone pulse generator to inhibition by estradiol and progesterone. J CHn Endocrinol Metab 1998;83:582-590.
96. Balasch J, Fabregues F, Casamitjana R, Penarrubia J, Vanrell JA. A pharmacokinctic and endocrine comparison of recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone and human mcnopausal gonadotrophin in polycystic ovary syndrome. Reprod Biomed Online 2003;6:296-301.
97. Urman B, Tiras B, Yakin K. Assisted reproduction in the treatment of polycystic ovarian syndrome. Reprod Biomed nline 2004;8:419-430.
VITTORIO UNFER1, MARIA LUISA CASINI2, GUIDO MARELLJ3, LOREDANA COSTABILE1, SANDRO GERLI4, & GIAN CARLO DI RENZO4
1AGUNCO Obstetrics and Gynecology Centre, Rome, Italy, 2Department of Human Physiology and Pharmacology 'Vittorio Erspamer', University 'La Sapienza', Rome, Italy, 3 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, University of Milan, Italy, and 4Centre of Perinatal and Reproductive Medicine, Department of Gynecological, Obstetrical and Paediatrk Sciences, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
(Received 25 March 2005; revised 17 May 2005; accepted 11 July 2005)
Correspondence: V. Unfcr, AGUNCO Obstetrics and Gynecology Centre, via G. Cassiani, Rome 15-00155, Italy. Tel: + 39 06 4050 0835. Fax: +19 06 324 1284. E-mail: vittorio.unierfajycos.com\
Copyright CRC Press Aug 2005