• E-mail
• Print
• Comment
• Font Size
• Digg
• del.icio.us
• Discuss article

Impact of Recreational Physical Activity on Bone Mineral Density in Middle-Aged Men

Posted on: Friday, 20 January 2006, 06:00 CST

By Medras, M; Slowinska-Lisowska, M; Jzkw, P

Abstract

Physical activity is known to exert beneficial effects on general health status of young, adult and elderly populations. Exercise (aside from genetic, hormonal, nutritional and pathological factors) also influences bone mineral density (BMD). Unfortunately, the association between physical exercise and BMD in adult population is controversial. Our aim was to assess relations between recreational physical activity and BMD in middle-aged men. We performed densitometry and hormonal measurements (total testosterone, free testosterone, dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate, estradiol) in a homogenous group of 38 subjects. Among them, we distinguished 22 who had not engaged in any physical activity, and 16 who had recreationally exercised for about 10 years. Both groups did not differ in regard to hormonal status. Similarly, densitometry did not reveal any statistically significant differences in BMD between both groups of men. Upon our observation, we can hypothesize that recreational physical activity does not affect bone mineral density in middle-aged men.

Keywords: Bone mineral density, middle-aged men, physical activity

Introduction

Bone mineral density (BMD) is determined by genetic, hormonal, nutritional and pathological factors. Physical exercise is also known to influence BMD [1,2]. Although the positive role of recreational physical activity on overall human health is doubtless, effects of different loads and intensity of exercise on bone mineralisation are still discussed [3,4].

The impact of physical exercise on bone mineralisation is most evident between puberty and the age of 25 years. This is a period of an intense growth of both the muscular and the skeletal systems, which is remarkably dependent on hormonal stimuli [4,5]. In older populations the influence of physical exercise on BMD is less pronounced, although opinions on this matter are controversial [6].

Our objective was to assess bone mineral density in recreationally exercising, middle-aged men.

Methods

The study material comprised 38 men (aged 4558 years) from within a cohort described in detail previously [7]. They hailed from the same socioeconomical background and were brought up in a similar material status; thus, their nutritional habits (average calcium intake in Polish population varies from 300mg/daily to 500mg/daily, lower than that recommended by WHO) [8] and leisure activities (including physical exercise) did not differ significantly. All of them attended the same schools in post-war Wroclaw.

The examined men were ex-smokers (for at least 10 years), did not suffer from any chronic diseases and had a BMI between 25.8 and 27.2. All of them were academic teachers or held business/ administrative positions. They led a hygienic lifestyle and occasionally drank alcohol. They had travelled to work by car daily, for at least 20 years. In each of them presence of andropausal symptoms was excluded, according to Morley and Heinemann scales.

Among the studied subjects, 22 had not engaged in any recreational physical activity since graduation (including holidays). They are referred to as the inactive group. Sixteen men who have exercised on average for 1.0-1.5 hours (swimming, basketball, volleyball or bicycle riding), twice a week, for about ten years prior examination (three men from within this group jogged regularly, two to three times a week) were selected for the active group.

Assessment of bone mineral density was performed by peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT) densitometry (Stratec 960) at the peripheral end of the radius of the non-dominant hand. Cortical, trabecular and whole bone mineral density (g/cm^sup 3^) were estimated. This method measures bone density with a high degree of precision [9]. It is a good predictor of vertebral fracture status and a reliable indicator of general age-related skeletal deterioration [10,11]. Bone mineral densities at the distal radius were found to be useful in diagnosis of osteopenia and osteoporosis [12].

Blood samples were obtained between 8.009.00 a.m. from the ulnar vein. After coagulation, they were centrifuged for 10 minutes with the power of 2000 g. Obtained plasma was frozen in -20C until it was analysed. Serum hormone levels were determined with the use of commercial RIA kits: total testosterone (TT), free testosterone (FT), dehydroepiandrosterone sulphate and estradiol (DPC, Los Angeles, USA). The intraserial and interserial variability coefficients were: 6.5% and 6.7% for total testosterone, 6.2% and 8.5% for free testosterone, 4.4% and 7.7% for dehydroepiandrosterone sulphate, 5.8% and 7.4% for estradiol, respectively.

The results were analysed with parametric tests (student t-test) and differences were acknowledged as significant at p < 0.05.

Results

Serum concentrations of hormones in the two studied groups are presented in Table I. We have found no statistically significant differences of total testosterone, free testosterone, dehydroepiandrosterone sulphate and estradiol between groups of physically active and physically inactive middle-aged men.

Densitometry results are shown in Table II. They revealed no statistically significant differences of cortical (including subcortical), trabecular and whole bone BMD between the two studied groups.

Discussion

The relationship between hormonal status and bone structure is well documented in both men and women. However, in male long- distance runners with lowered BMC, hormone metabolism turned out to be unrelated to training [13]. In a study of 140 men aged 53-62 years, aerobic threshold, or the change in aerobic threshold, were also not associated with sex hormones or SHBG levels [14]. Hormonal parameters that could potentially affect bone mineral density (as well as other parameters, e.g. symptoms of andropause) did not differ between the active and the inactive men in our study. Although the level of physical activity in the studied subjects was low and did not conform to current recommendations, both time and type of exercise were typical for the Polish male urban population. The amount of time spent on exercising was essentially the most important feature distinguishing these two groups.

Table I. Bone mineral density (BMD) of the radius in the groups of physically active and physically inactive men (mean + SD). In all cases, differences of BMD between the groups were statistically insignificant (ns).

Table II. Serum concentrations of total testosterone (TT), free testosterone (FT), dehydroepiandrosterone sulphate (DHEA-S) and estradiol (E^sub 2^) in physically active and physically inactive men (mean + SD). In all cases, differences between the groups were statistically insignificant (ns).

The influence of physical activity on bone is due to forces exerted through passive parts of the motor system and muscles tensions during movements. These forces lead to cellular changes, e.g., through piezoelectric mechanisms and subsequent remineralisation. Exercise suppresses osteoclastic bone resorption [15]. Increased cortical thickness seems to be a result of endocortical and periosteal apposition [16]. The positive role of exercise-induced bone tensions on geometrical reorganization of the bone without considerable increases in bone mineral mass has also been postulated. According to this theory, physical activity could enhance the strength of the skeletal system without considerable increases in bone mineral mass.

Human bones are especially sensitive to exercise before puberty. In this period moderate weightbearing exercise leads to, for example, an increase in femoral BMD. On the other hand, several studies have found lowered bone mineral content in young [17,18] and older males undergoing physical training (extreme levels of exercise, at more than 200 mm/ week) [18]. It was hypothesized that bone mineral loss observed in male athletes could be due to calcium imbalance during training [19]. However, fast demineralisation of the skeleton under immobilization proves the role of exercise in bone maintenance most evidently [20].

Recreational physical activity is often recommended as a means of preserving BMD in the adult population. Our observation suggests there is no correlation between recreational exercise and bone mineral density in middle-aged Polish men. This stands in concordance with the outcome of a four-year, controlled, randomized trial in Finnish middle-aged men; long-term, regular aerobic physical activity appeared to have no effect on the agerelated loss of femoral BMD [14]. Also, Huuskonen et al. found no correlation between regular aerobic exercise and BMD in men aged 53-62 [14]. Similarly, physical activity was not related to improvement of BMD in men and women studied by Brahm et al. [21].

On the other hand, exercise was found to contribute to bone mass in a prospective Leuven longitudinal study on lifestyle, physical fitness and health (126 males, 27 year follow-up) [22]. Duppe et al. showed that, in men aged 21-42 years, BMD was higher by 9% than in those who spent more time exercising [23]. Nguyen et al. demonstrated that physical activity may have a positive impact on BMD and may reduce the risk of osteoporosis in men and women aged 69 + 6.7 years [2]. Also, Yoshimura implied that strength exercise (unlike moderate or low intensity ae\robic one) might stimulate BMD increase in adults [24]. It is worthy of note that peripheral quantitative computed tomography allows the measurement of the actual densitometric parameters separately in cortical and trabecular compartment of bone structure (and whole bone) [25]. This method is often applied in evaluation of associations between various factors and BMD in human and animal studies [26,27].

Regarding conflicting reports in the literature and our own results, we see an urgent need for establishing the precise type (strength or resistance) and amount of exercise required for bone mass preservation in middle-aged men. As a decrease in BMD is an expected process during this period of life, preventive measures (such as recreational exercise) should focus on its prevention, as well as reduction of falls.

It should be noted here that regular physical activity improves the function of multiple organs, especially the muscular and the vascular systems. It also warrants hormonal homeostasis. Even if exercise has no direct impact on BMD, better physical performance, improved strength and resistance are essential for keeping general fitness until late senility. Thanks to greater muscle strength and joint flexibility one can avoid falls, bone fractures and their sometimes-fatal consequences.

References

1. Proctor DN, Melton LJ, Khosla S, Crowson CS, O'Connor MK, Riggs BL. Relative influence of physical activity, muscle mass and strength on bone density. Osteoporos Int 2000;11: 944-952.

2. Nguyen TV, Center JR, Eisman JA. Osteoporosis in elderly men and women: effects of dietary calcium, physical activity and body mass index. J Bone Miner Res 2000;15(2):322-331.

3. Ryan AS, Ivey FM, Hurlbut DE, Martel GF, Lemmer JT, Sorkin JD, Metter EJ, Fleg JL, Hurley BF. Regional bone mineral density after resistive training in young and older men and women. Scand J Med Sci Sports 2004;14:16-23.

4. Kelley GA, Kelley KS, Tran ZV. Exercise and bone mineral density in men: a meta-analysis. J Appl Physiol 2000;88: 1730-1736.

5. Delvaux K, Lefevre J, Philippaerts R, Dequeker J, Thomis M, Vanreusel B, Claessens A, Eynde BV, Beunen G, Lysens R. Bone mass and lifetime physical activity in Flemish males: a 27-year follow- up study. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2001;33: 1868-1875.

6. Karlsson MK. Skeletal effects of exercise in men. Calcif Tissue Int 2001;69(4):196-199.

7. Medras M, Jankowska E, Rogucka EA, Lopuszanska M. The effects of sex steroids and some elements of lifestyle on the normal variation of bone mineral content in younger versus older healthy Polish males. Aging Male 2000;3:65-74.

8. Gilis-Januszewska A, Topor-Madry R, Pajak A. Education and the quality of diet in women and men at age 45-64, in Cracow. Przegl Lek 2003;60:675-681.

9. Gordon CL, Webber CE, Adachi JD, Christoforou N. In vivo assessment of trabecular bone structure at the distal radius from high-resolution computed tomography images. Phys Med Biol 1996;41:495-508.

10. Gardsell P, Johnell O, Nilsson B, Gullberg B. Predicting various fragility fractures in women by forearm bone densitometry. Calcif Tissue International 1993;52:348-353.

11. Grampp S, Lang P, Jergas M, Gluer CC, Mathur A, Engelke K, Genant HK. Assessment of the skeletal status by peripheral quantitative computed tomography of the forearm: short-term precision in vivo and comparison to dual X-ray absorptiometry. J Bone Miner Res 1995; 10:1566-1576.

12. Hasegawa Y, Kushida K, Yamazaki K, Inoue T. Volumetric bone mineral density using peripheral quantitative computed tomography in Japanese women. Osteoporos Int 1997;7:195-199.

13. Afghani A, Xie B, Wiswell RA, Gong J, Li Y, Anderson Johnson C. Bone mass of Asian adolescents in China: influence of physical activity and smoking. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2003;35:720-729.

14. Hetland ML, Haarbo J, Christiansen C. Low bone mass and high bone turnover in male long distance runners. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1993;77:770-775.

15. Huuskonen J, Vaisanen SB, Kroger H, Jurvelin JS, Alhava E, Rauramaa R. Regular physical exercise and bone mineral density: a four-year controlled randomized trial in middleaged men. Osteoporosis Int 2001;12:349-355.

16. Rutherford OM. Is there a role for exercise in the prevention of osteoporotic fractures. Br J Sport Med 1999;33:378386.

17. Bradney M, Pearce G, Naughton G, Sullivan C, Bass S, Beck T, Carlson J, seeman E. Moderate exercise during growth in prepubertal boys: changes in bone mass, size, volumetric density, and bone strength: a controlled prospective study. J Bone Miner Res 1998;13(12):1814-1821.

18. MacDougall JD, Webber CE, Martin J, Ormarod S, Chesley A, Younglai EV, Gordon CL, Blimkie CJ. Relationship among running mileage, bone density, and serum testosterone in male runners. J Appl Physiol 1992;73:1165-70.

19. Michel BA, Lane NE, Bloch DA, Jones HH, Fries JF. Effect of changes in weight-bearing exercise on lumbar bone mass after age fifty. Ann Med 1991;23:397-401.

20. Klesges RC, Ward KD, Shelton ML, Applegate WB, Gantier ED, Palmieri GMA, Harmon K, Davis J. Changes in bone mineral content in male athletes. JAMA 1996;276: 226-230.

21. Smith EL, Gilligan C. Physical activity effects on bone metabolism. Calcif Tissue Int 1991;49:50-54.

22. Brahm H, Mallmin, Michaelsson K, Strom H, Ljunghall S. Relationships between bone mass measurements and lifetime physical activity in a Swedish population. Calcif Tissue Int 1998;62:400- 412.

23. Duppe H, Gardsell P, Johnell O, Nilsson BE, Ringsberg K. Bone mineral density, muscle strength and physical activity. A population- based study of 332 subjects aged 15^12 years. Acta Orthop Scan 1997;68:97-103.

24. Yoshimura N. Exercise and physical activities for the prevention of osteoporotic fractures: a review of evidence. Nippon Eiseigaku Zasshi 2003;58:328-337.

25. Augat P, Fuerst T, Genant HK. Quantitative bone mineral assessment at the forearm: a review. Osteoporos Int 1998;8:299-310.

26. Moisio KC, Podolskaya G, Barnhart B, Berzins A, Sumner DR. pQCT provides better prediction of canine femur breaking load than does DXA. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact 2003,3:240-245.

27. Uusi-Rasi K, Sievanen H, Pasanen M, Oja P, Vuori I. Association of physical activity and calcium intake with the maintenance of bone mass in premenopausal women. Osteoporos Int 2002;13:211-217.

M. MEDRAS, M. SLOWINSKA-LISOWSKA, & P. JZKW

Department of Sports Medicine, University of Physical Education, Wroclaw, Poland

Correspondence: M. Medras, Department of Sports Medicine, University of Physical Education, 51-617 Wroclaw, Paderewskiego 35, Poland. Tel: 48 71 347 32 47. Fax: 48 71 347 30 36. E-mail: medras@endo.am.wroc.pl

Copyright CRC Press Sep-Dec 2005

Source: Aging Male

More News in this Category