The Lack of a Structured Prioritization Model for Allocating Risk and Fraud Budget Resources Is Hindering Many Financial Institutions in Their Fraud Mitigation Efforts
Posted on: Friday, 15 June 2007, 12:15 CDT
Research and Markets (http://www.researchandmarkets.com/reports/c59850) has announced the addition of new Javelin Strategy report Risk & Fraud Budgeting Model: Prioritizing the 2008 Budget for Effective Fraud Mitigation to their offering.
This report aids institutions in their anti-fraud prioritization efforts, providing a set of steps and recommended inputs for FIs to leverage in their respective 2008 budget prioritization models. The lack of a structured prioritization model for allocating risk and fraud budget resources is hindering many financial institutions in their fraud mitigation efforts. Utilizing robust qualitative data gathered from executive interviews and quantitative findings from the nation's most comprehensive study on identity fraud, Javelin investigates the current prioritization practices, and recommendations to eliminate problems with existing processes.
Primary Questions
- What is fraud "prioritization" and what are the benefits of a structured, fact-based budget prioritization model to brand, customer loyalty, losses and overall ROI?
- How are FIs prioritizing investments and resources to combat identity fraud?
- What are the common obstacles that executives face in the prioritization process?
- What are the components of an effective budget prioritization model?
- How can a structured model be used to make more effective and dynamic decisions?
Content Outline:
Overview
Primary Questions
Findings and Analysis
Executive Summary
Incorporating Fraud Data from the Consumer Perspective into your Model
Developing a Prioritization Model: Steps
Defining "Prioritization"
For Many FIs, Prioritization Is Disorganized, Illogical and Riddled with Obstacles
How Are Risk and Fraud Executives Setting their Budget Priorities to Fight Fraud?
Developing a Model: Breaking down the Data
Aligning Industry-Defined Fraud Categories with Consumer Data: Account Type
Aligning Industry-Defined Fraud Categories with Consumer Data: Means of Access
Aligning Industry-Defined Fraud Categories with Consumer Data: Means of Misuse
Prioritization Model: An Abbreviated Example
Table of Figures
Figure 1: Four Step Prioritization Model
Figure 3: Risk and Fraud Executives Faced with Daunting Challenges
Figure 4: Prioritization Elements that Drive ROI
Figure 5: Classifying Fraud: Industry and Consumer Data Categories
Figure 6: One-Year Fraud Incidence Rates
Figure 7: How the Criminal Obtained the Victim's Information
Figure 8: How the Criminal Perpetrated Identity Fraud
Figure 9: Ranking Your Fraud Priorities
For more information visit http://www.researchandmarkets.com/reports/c59850.
Source: Business Wire
Related Articles
- Reduced Costs and Streamlined Healthcare Supply Chain Pilot Expands Existing Data Synchronization Program to Create Industry-Wide Resource of Healthcare Product Information
- Global Healthcare Exchange Launches the New GHX AllSource(R) Content Repository for Data Synchronization in the Healthcare Industry
- Consumers at Risk With Trends in the Telecom Industry ; Though Complex, How These Companies Are Regulated Matters to Ordinary Americans.
- Digene Consumer Ad Wins Industry Award for Best Product Launch
- Sprint Nextel Selects Attunity Data Integration Platform for Its Industry First Zero Latency Enterprise System
- China to Curb Expansion of Energy-Consuming Copper Smelting Industry
- TPEs Enhance Consumer and Light-Industrial Products
- PhRMA Expands Campaign to Educate Consumers on Risks of Importing Prescription Drugs
- Symmetricom Upgrades Model 56000 Data Rate Clock and Distribution Chassis
User Comments (0)

RSS Feeds