Letter: Royal Finances
Posted on: Sunday, 3 July 2005, 12:00 CDT
Your article 'Exposed: How the Prince of Wales pocketed pounds 8m from Highgrove' (June 26) displays a lack of understanding of the difference between income and capital. Princes of Wales are entitled to the net income of the Duchy of Cornwall, but not to the Duchy's assets and capital profits. Net rental income " what is left after maintenance and other expenses " is paid to the Prince as part of the Duchy's revenue surplus. This is far from being a revelation.
Because the Duchy is required to obtain a proper return from its assets, the Prince pays a market rent of pounds 336,000 a year for Highgrove and the Home Farm. The rent paid by the Prince, together with rents paid by all the other Duchy tenants, forms part of the income which he receives from the Duchy.
If the Prince did not pay rent for Highgrove it would mean his living costs were being met by the Duchy (which is not permitted). He would be evading tax on the rent which he pays as a tenant, but receives as Prince of Wales. All of the Prince's income from the Duchy is taxed.
Paddy Harverson
Clarence House, London
Source: Independent on Sunday, The
Related Articles
- Cellcom Israel Announces Third Quarter 2009 Results With Record Revenues, Operating Income and EBITDA[1]
- Boralex Power Income Fund: Results for First Quarter 2008
- Boralex Power Income Fund: Fourth Quarter and Fiscal 2007 - Financial Results and Reduction in Distributions
- William Wales: Prince of a Guy on Facebook
- Natural Gas Services Group, Inc. Announces an 89% Increase in Net Income and a 55% Increase in Diluted Earnings Per Share
- Empty Building Costly for State: $118,000-a-Month Rent Paid for Unoccupied Office Space
- Stantec Marks 52nd Consecutive Year of Profitability With a 34% Increase in Net Income for 2005
- Income-Tax Threshold Raised for Foreigners
- Kyrgyz Local Broadcaster Gets 40-Fold Rent Increase
- Kyrgyzstan: Radio "Almaz" Gets 40-Fold Rent Increase, Continues RFL Relays
User Comments (0)

RSS Feeds