Sunnis dig in heels against Iraq constitution
By Luke Baker
BAGHDAD (Reuters) – Iraq’s Sunni Arabs stood staunchly
against a new constitution on Wednesday, making it more likely
the Shi’ite-Kurdish backed document will have to be rammed
through parliament over Sunni opposition later this week.
As part of a growing campaign against a charter they argue
devolves too much power to the regions and demonises Saddam
Hussein’s Baath Party, Sunni leaders held strident news
conferences in Baghdad while demonstrations went on elsewhere.
“We reject federalism in the central and southern regions,
we reject it because it has no basis other than sectarianism,”
Adnan al-Dulaimi, head of an umbrella group called the National
Conference for the Sunni People of Iraq, told reporters.
“Every Iraqi must stand in the way of all those who want to
deepen sectarianism in Iraq.”
In Hawija, north of Baghdad, hundreds of Sunnis marched in
support of their political leaders and against the
constitution, saying it had been presented to parliament
without consensus. Other small rallies were held in Baghdad and
other cities.
Supporters of Moqtada al-Sadr, a rebellious young Shi’ite
cleric who also strongly opposes the constitution, joined the
demonstrations in Hawija.
Dulaimi, in a move likely to entrench the standoff between
Sunnis on the one side and Shi’ites and Kurds on the other,
also called for prisoners to be freed. Most of the more than
10,000 detainees in U.S.-run facilities in Iraq are Sunnis.
“Iraq is going through a crisis that needs all to raise
their voice to release prisoners before the elections so they
can participate in the vote,” he said, clearly hoping for more
Sunni engagement than was shown in January’s boycotted
election.
President Jalal Talabani held further talks with leaders
from the three major communities on Wednesday, but he looked
unlikely to be able to forge a consensus before Thursday’s
parliamentary meeting, when the constitution will be voted on.
The Shi’ites and Kurds, who dominate the government and
have an overwhelming majority in parliament, presented the
draft minutes before a deadline on Monday, despite Sunni
opposition.
The speaker of the assembly accepted the document, but
called for three more days of talks to see if the Sunnis, who
dominated Iraq under Saddam Hussein and before, could be
convinced to rally behind it.
PEOPLE POLITICS
There are concerns that if the Sunnis cannot be brought on
board, it will lead to more attacks by the Sunni insurgency.
There were no signs of a let-up in violence, with a string of
attacks in the capital and elsewhere on Wednesday.
Gunmen attacked a convoy carrying the deputy justice
minister in Baghdad, killing four of his bodyguards and
wounding five others. The minister escaped assassination. It
was the second attempt on his life in two days.
In Baquba, north of Baghdad, four mortars hit an Iraqi
police base, wounding at least seven people. Two mortars hit a
checkpoint south of the capital, killing a soldier.
Militants have threatened to kill any Sunnis who take part
in politics or a referendum on the constitution scheduled for
mid-October. Last week, three Sunni politicians were publicly
executed in Mosul after putting up referendum posters.
Despite those threats, Sunni leaders appear determined to
take their battle against the constitution to the referendum.
If two-thirds of voters in three or more of Iraq’s 18
provinces vote No in the October 15 plebiscite, the
constitution is rejected. Sunnis have a majority in at least
three provinces, and hope followers of Sadr, who has a wealth
of support among poor, urban Shi’ites, will also vote No,
ensuring the document is defeated. New elections would then
have to be held.
Shi’ites and Kurds are hoping that not only will the
constitution receive support in the parliamentary vote on
Thursday, but that they can convince Sunnis in the next two
months that it is document for all Iraqis.
“There are many Sunnis who support the constitution as it
stands,” Hussain al-Shahristani, the deputy speaker of
parliament and a Shi’ite, said last week. “Those (leaders)
speaking against it do not necessarily represent the
community.”
