District Court Rules Judicial Watch May Conduct Discovery Into Clinton Library
Posted on: Thursday, 20 March 2008, 15:00 CDT
Judicial Watch, the public interest group that investigates and prosecutes government corruption, announced today that U.S. District Judge James Robertson granted Judicial Watch's motion to conduct discovery into the procedures used by the National Archives and Records Administrations to process its requests for records at the Clinton Library. [Judicial Watch, Inc. v U.S. National Archives and Records Administration, Civil Action No: 1:07-cv-01267 (JR)]. The National Archives has requested, in effect, an indefinite stay in Judicial Watch's lawsuit to obtain Hillary Clinton's records, estimating in court documents that it will take "one to two years" to begin processing Hillary's telephone logs.
According to Judicial Watch's Motion for Limited Discovery, filed on March 17, 2008: "Defendant's failure to properly respond to Plaintiff's FOIA request raises significant questions of fact... A full and complete understanding of the Library's 'queue' system, and [Judicial Watch's] position in the queue, is necessary before any request for a stay can be adjudicated by the Court. Plaintiff respectfully suggests that the answers to these questions, if [Judicial Watch] is permitted to obtain them through limited discovery, would be in the public interest as well as its own."
The Clinton Presidential Library, which is operated by the National Archives and Records Administration, has established a complex 17-part queue structure for processing Hillary's White House records that has placed Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests related to unidentified flying objects (UFO's), for example, ahead of timelier public interest requests. Moreover, the Library, in essence, has admitted in its court filings that it wildly underestimated the public's interest in the records, was woefully unprepared when it started receiving FOIA requests, and remains understaffed and entirely unable to comply with its statutory responsibilities.
After a government lawyer for the Archives explained its confusing queue system in court today, Judge Robertson told Judicial Watch Director of Litigation Paul Orfanedes, "You have your discovery."
"The Clinton Library now will have to answer questions under oath about how it is handling (or not handling) requests for the Clinton records. The American people deserve to know how and why these records are not being processed and released in accordance with the law," said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. "National Archives officials should get their act together and do their job, instead of complaining of how much work they have to do."
On March 19, Judicial Watch's lawsuit forced the release of 11,046 pages of former First Lady Hillary Clinton's daily schedule records, comprising 2,888 days of schedules.
Contact: Jill Farrell 202-646-5188
SOURCE: Judicial Watch
Source: MARKET WIRE
Related Articles
- Author Taylor Branch to Discuss The Clinton Tapes at the National Archives on Oct. 7
- Former American Idol Finalist and Hickory Records Recording Artist Elliott Yamin Named National Spokesperson for the American Diabetes Association and Lends Strong Voice to Diabetes Issues Worldwide
- STMicroelectronics Announces Dual DVB-S2 Demodulator to Enable Cost-Effective HDTV Watch-and-Record DVR Satellite Set-Top Boxes
- Clinton Presidential Library Visitors Take 'Time to Laugh'
- Parker & Waichman, LLP Files Motion Before the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation Requesting Consolidation of Ortho Evra Product Liability Lawsuits -- JNJ
- Critically Acclaimed Special 'Inside 9/11' Sets Ratings Records Across Every Metric for National Geographic Channel
- Plextor Introduces the Simplest Way to Watch, Pause, Record TV on a Personal Computer
- Site Watch - Duke University's Medical Center Library online
- Clinton Says Library Represents His Hopes
- Booksellers Predict Record Clinton Sales
User Comments (0)

RSS Feeds