Alternative Fuels Could Cut 80 Percent Of Greenhouse Gas Emissions By 2050
redOrbit Staff & Wire Reports – Your Universe Online
The United States could cut petroleum consumption and greenhouse gas emissions by 80 percent by 2050 for light-duty vehicles through the use of alternative fuels and strong government policies aimed at overcoming high costs and influencing consumer choices, according to a National Research Council report released on Monday.
“To reach the 2050 goals for reducing petroleum use and greenhouse gases, vehicles must become dramatically more efficient, regardless of how they are powered,” said Douglas Chapin, principal of MPR Associates and chair of the committee that wrote the report.
“In addition, alternative fuels to petroleum must be readily available, cost-effective and produced with low emissions of greenhouse gases. Such a transition will be costly and require several decades,” he said in a statement.
“The committee’s model calculations, while exploratory and highly uncertain, indicate the benefits of making the transition, i.e. energy cost savings, improved vehicle technologies, and reductions in petroleum use and greenhouse gas emissions, exceed the additional costs of the transition over and above what the market is willing to do voluntarily,” he added.
Improving the efficiency of conventional vehicles is, up to a point, the most economical and easiest-to-implement approach to saving fuel and lowering emissions, according to the report. This approach includes reducing work the engine must perform by reducing the vehicle weight, aerodynamic resistance, rolling resistance, and accessories, along with improving the efficiency of the internal combustion engine powertrain.
However, improved efficiency alone will not meet the 2050 goals, wrote the authors of the report.
Indeed, the average fuel economy of vehicles on the road would have to exceed 180 mpg — something highly unlikely with current technologies.
With this in mind, the study committee analyzed vehicle and fuel alternatives, including hybrid electric vehicles like the Toyota Prius, plug-in hybrid electric vehicles like the Chevy Volt, battery electric vehicles such as the Nissan Leaf, hydrogen fuel cell electric vehicles and compressed natural gas vehicles like the Honda Civic Natural Gas.
While the per-mile driving costs will be lower, particularly for vehicles powered by natural gas or electricity, the high initial purchase cost would likely be a significant barrier to broad consumer acceptance, according to the report. Indeed, all the vehicles considered in the report are several thousand dollars more expensive than today’s conventional vehicles, and will likely remain so in the future.
Furthermore, alternative vehicles will likely be limited to just a few body styles and sizes, particularly in the early years. The authors of the report also predict some vehicles will rely on fuels that are not readily available, or that have restricted travel range, while others may require bulky energy storage that will limit their cargo and passenger capacity.
GOVERNMENTS MUST PLAY A ROLE
This is where governments can help, since widespread consumer acceptance is one of the most critical factors, and large numbers of alternative vehicles must be purchased long before 2050 if the on-road fleet is to meet desired performance goals.
Strong policies and technology advances are essential in overcoming this challenge, the committee said.
The report identified several scenarios that could meet the 2050 greenhouse gas goal, each of which combines highly efficient vehicles with at least one of three alternative power sources: biofuel, electricity, or hydrogen.
Natural gas vehicles were considered, but their greenhouse gas emissions are too high for the 2050 goal. However, if the costs of these vehicles can be reduced and an appropriate refueling infrastructure created, they have great potential for reducing petroleum consumption.
While corn-grain ethanol and biodiesel are the only biofuels to have been produced in commercial quantities in the US, the study committee found much greater potential in biofuels made from lignocellulosic biomass, which includes crop residues like wheat straw, switchgrass, whole trees and wood waste.
This “drop-in” fuel is designed to be a direct replacement for gasoline and could lead to large reductions in both petroleum use and greenhouse gas emissions. It can also be introduced without major changes in fuel delivery infrastructure or vehicles.
The report finds sufficient lignocellulosic biomass could be produced by 2050 to meet the goal of an 80 percent reduction in petroleum use when combined with highly efficient vehicles.
Vehicles powered by electricity will not emit any greenhouse gases, but the production of electricity and the additional load on the electric power grid are factors that must be considered.
To the extent fossil resources are used to generate electricity, successful implementation of carbon capture and storage will be essential, the authors concluded. These vehicles also rely on batteries, which are projected to drop steeply in price.
Nevertheless, limited range and long recharge times will likely restrain the use of all-electric vehicles mainly to local driving.
Meanwhile, all of the advanced battery technologies under development face serious technical challenges. For instance, when hydrogen is used as a fuel cell in electric vehicles, the only vehicle emission is water. However, varying amounts of greenhouse gases are emitted during hydrogen production, and the low-greenhouse gas methods of making hydrogen are more expensive and will need further development to become competitive.
Hydrogen fuel cell vehicles could become less costly than the advanced internal combustion engine vehicles of 2050. Fuel cell vehicles are not subject to the limitations of battery vehicles, but developing a hydrogen infrastructure in concert with a growing number of fuel cell vehicles will be difficult and expensive, according to the report.
FOCUS ON EFFICIENCY
The technology advances required to meet the 2050 goals are challenging and not assured. Yet, the committee considers dramatic cost reduction and overall performance enhancement possible without unpredictable technology breakthroughs.
Rather, achieving these goals requires the improved technology focus on reducing fuel use rather than adding greater power or weight.
It is impossible to know which technologies will ultimately succeed, the report says, because all involve uncertainty. The best approach is to promote a portfolio of vehicle and fuel research and development, supported by both government and industry, designed to solve the critical challenges in each major candidate technology.
Such primary research efforts need continuing evaluation of progress against performance goals to determine which technologies, fuels, designs, and production methods are emerging as the most promising and cost-effective, the committee said in its report.
NEW POLICIES NEEDED
Overcoming the barriers to advanced vehicles and fuels will require a rigorous policy framework that is more stringent than the proposed fuel economy standards for 2025. This policy intervention could include high and increasing fuel economy standards, R&D support, subsidies, and public information programs aimed at improving consumers’ familiarity with the new fuels and powertrains. Because of the high level of uncertainty in the pace and scale of technology advances, this framework should be modified as technologies develop and as conditions change.
It is essential that policies promoting particular technologies to the public are not introduced before these new fuels and vehicle technologies are close to market readiness, and consumer behavior toward them is well understood. The report warns forcing a technology into the market should be undertaken only when the benefits of the proposed support justify its costs.