Seeing Is Believing - But Not The Same As Looking
Posted on: Wednesday, 26 March 2008, 11:15 CDT
A new study confirms that if you see it, you believe you had been looking at itIf you see something, it’s because you’re looking at it, right? A recently published study examined this question and established that while people do tend to notice objects within their gaze, it is the assumptions they make about their environment that affects their perceptions. This study gives insight into how the brain and the eye work together to interpret everyday observations.
The study “If I saw it, it probably wasn’t far from where I was looking,” reflects the work of a group of researchers led by E.M. Brenner, PhD of Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam. The article recently appeared in the Journal of Vision, published by the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology .
Prior studies have confirmed that people’s familiarity with the world around them allows them to make credible assumptions about what they see. This study sought to discover how people would visually interpret a constantly changing or uncertain environment in the absence of common visual assumptions.
Eight subjects participated in two experiments to identify the location of a jumping target (a circular green cursor). In the first session, the target jumped to different locations within five concentric circles (arranged around a fixation point) every 250 milliseconds. The subjects had to position a mouse cursor at the location where the target had been at the moment of a flash. The second session mimicked the first except a tone replaced the flash. Each session continued until subjects made 250 responses.
The authors found that participants clearly preferred to select target positions nearer to where their eyes were looking. This finding held true whether a tone or a flash indicated the moment of interest. The study suggests that when in doubt, people are biased towards believing that they were looking directly at what they have seen.
“Without making assumptions about our environment, our possibilities for interpreting visual stimulation would be quite limited,” explained Dr. Brenner. “Presumably, our experience with the world teaches us which assumptions to accept. You are most likely to see something if your gaze is directed at it. Thus if you saw something you may be biased towards believing that you had been looking at it.”
---
On the Net:
Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology (ARVO)
Journal of Vision
Related Articles
- HepaLife's Bioartificial Liver Successful in Important Studies Modeling Human Liver Failure Environment
- OrbusNeich's Genous(TM) Bio-Engineered R Stent(TM) is Subject of Sessions on Innovation at TCT 2007
- Study Shows Potential of Targeted Microbubbles Using Peregrine's VTA Technology to Identify Which Cancer Patients Would Benefit From Anti-Angiogenesis Therapy
- Study: 2/3 Diabetics Not Hitting Targets
- Study: Men Enjoy Seeing Bad People Suffer
- Cytori Therapeutics Demonstrates Adipose Stem Cells Improve Cardiac Function and Blood Flow in Preclinical Heart Attack Study; Data Presented at American Heart Association Scientific Sessions
- Advanced Viral Research Corp. Initiates a Phase I, Safety Study for AVR118 in Type 2 Diabetic Subjects
- Both Parties See Big Wins From Special Session
- Oil and Gas: Crises and Controversies 1961-2000 (Volume 2): Europe's Entanglement, Studies and Commentaries/Energy and Environment: Multiregulation in Europe
- Comment ; Look down a microscope to see why this is a fascinating career
Rating: 2.7 / 5 (7 votes)
 |
 |
Rate this article:
User Comments (0)
RSS Feeds