Throwing Back the Biggest Fish Better for Ecosystem
Posted on: Wednesday, 16 April 2008, 12:30 CDT
Scientists in San Diego reported Wednesday that commercial and sport fishing are destabilizing fish populations by targeting the oldest and biggest fish and allowing the faster-growing younger fish to wildly proliferate. Such fishing effectively alters the ‘age pyramid’ of the fish, the researchers said.The scientists advised fisheries to encourage the taking of younger, smaller fish rather than requiring that they be thrown back.
"That type of regulation, which we see in many sport fisheries, is exactly wrong," George Sugihara of the Scripps Institution of Oceanography at the University of California San Diego said in a statement.
"It's not the young ones that should be thrown back, but the larger, older fish that should be spared . Not only do the older fish provide stability ... to the population, they provide more and better quality offspring," he added.
In conducting the research, Sugihara and his team used a study established by the California sardine fishery after its collapse in the 1940s, and examined 50 years worth of records of fished and non-fished species.
In a report on the research published in the journal Nature, Sugihara wrote that current policies that manage according to biomass targets rather than individual fish size can also destabilize the fish population.
He said a single large fish will simply lose a small amount of weight when food becomes scarce, or grow a little when food is more available. However, a population of many smaller, younger fish could explode in number or collapse according to the availability of food.
Sugihara remarked that this is particularly important when trying to rebuild fish stocks.
"A high harvest target may be set after an especially abundant period when the population may be poised to decline on its own," he said.
Nils Stenseth of the University of Oslo said commercial and sport fishing practices that emphasize taking only the oldest and biggest fish can actually impose rapid evolutionary changes in the fish populations.
"Many recent studies have provided evidence for this ... effect, and show that the ecological-evolutionary consequences of harvesting can occur at a much faster rate than previously thought," Stenseth wrote in a commentary about the research.
---
On the Net:
Scripps Institution of Oceanography
Nature
Source: redOrbit Staff and Wire Reports
Related Articles
- Vitamin D in fish makes it 'brain food'
- Sports Doping Researchers to Tackle Mount Everest
- New Sports Nutrition Research Shows Eight Percent Boost in Athletic Performance
- Male Fish Cannibalism Puzzles Researchers
- Estrogen Use Lowered One Risk Factor for Heart Disease Among Some Younger Postmenopausal Women, Stanford Researcher Says
- Glaucoma Diagnosis May Be Mistaken in Some Younger Chinese People, Stanford Researchers Say
- MarketResearch.Com Announces Distribution of In-Food Research
- Pelican Signs Flock to Fish for Cancer-Research Funding: Shores Residents and Barry University Are Teaming Up to Fight Cancer at the Community's Third Annual Relay for Life, and a Flock of Purple Pelicans Are
- Where There's Smoke, There Might Be Food Research, Too
- Minimizing the Risk of Terrorism Drives Food Researchers, Says Institute of Food Technologists
Rating: 4.0 / 5 (2 votes)
 |
 |
Rate this article:
User Comments (0)
RSS Feeds