• E-mail
  • Print
  • Comment
  • Font Size
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Discuss article

Drivers Misled By 'Miles-Per-Gallon' Rating

Posted on: Friday, 20 June 2008, 00:40 CDT

Researchers said Thursday that the key to saving money on ever growing fuel prices is looking at vehicle efficiency in a new way: gallons-per-mile.
 
Duke Larrick, a researcher with Duke University, said, "There is a math illusion here." His study was published in the journal Science.
  
As the price of gasoline tops $4 a gallon, using miles-per-gallon can be misleading for those trying to save dollars.

Richard Larrick and Jack Soll discussed fuel efficiency while carpooling to work at Duke University's Fuqua School of Business.

The result is a paper called "The MPG Illusion," appearing Friday in the journal Science.

The professors studied how consumers perceive statistics and decided to look into the auto efficiency ratings and what they tell consumers.

In essence, they say, don't ignore what may seem like a small gain, it can still mean big savings at the pump.

Larrick said, not everyone is a good candidate for a tiny car. A family of five or six needs a larger vehicle. Moving to even a slightly more efficient large car can mean big savings.

"We realized improving low mpgs is where the big bang is," Larrick said. "But we realized that people were not going to understand that."

Jack Gillis of the Consumer Federation of America called their paper "extraordinarily profound in its simplicity."
 
The study shows drivers with inefficient cars, who may feel they have no options, can experience major savings by just moderately increasing their fuel efficiency.

Gillis said, "I am convinced that the average, extraordinarily frustrated, owner of a fuel inefficient car has no idea that making a small improvement will save more money and will save the environment more than a larger improvement in a more efficient car".
 
So how do you find savings in miles per gallon?

Duke researchers calculated that at $4-a-gallon, over 10,000 miles, an improvement from 12 mpg to 13 mpg would save a driver $256. For the owner of a 33 mpg car to save that much, mileage would have to go up to 40 mpg, he said.

Here's how the theory works. Say a couple drives a 25 mpg sedan. They trade it for a 50 mpg hybrid, a 25 mpg improvement.

A family with mom, dad and three kids has a 10 mpg SUV to haul everyone around. They trade it for a 20 mpg station wagon, a 10 mpg improvement.

Sounds like the couple did better, at least in miles per gallon, but lets re-examine gallons per mile.

At 25 mpg the couple burned 400 gallons over a year and their new 50 mpg hybrid cuts that to 200 gallons. They save 200 gallons.

At 10 mpg the family's SUV burns 1,000 gallons of gas a year. At 20 mpg the station wagon burns 500 gallons - they save 500 gallons, much better than the couple.

Larrick tested his theory in a number of different experiments on U.S. college students.

When presented with a series of car choices in which fuel efficiency was defined in miles per gallon, the students could not easily identify the choice that would result in the greatest gains in fuel efficiency.

Larrick found people had a much easier time when fuel efficiency was expressed in gallons per 100 miles.

For example, a car that gets 18 miles per gallon uses 5.5 gallons of gas per 100 miles, and a car that gets 28 miles per gallon uses just 3.6 gallons per 100 miles. Plus, with gasoline prices over $4 a gallon, that's a difference of about $8 per 100 miles.

"If we just turn everything around, you can see where the large savings are in gallons of gas," Larrick said.

The idea is not new. Many other countries, especially in Europe, already use a standard that compares gas used per trip.

To translate miles per gallon into gallons per 10,000, Larrick said drivers should simply divide 10,000 by miles per gallon. Cars with the highest miles per gallon are always the most fuel efficient, he said. He cautions that it’s when consumers try to replace a car that they may be misled.

Duke researchers want to make choices easier, by recommending consumer publications and car makers start listing fuel efficiency in terms of gallons per 10,000 miles driven, which he said is roughly the distance people in the United States drive in a year.

---

On the Net:

Science

Duke University


Source: redOrbit Staff & Wire Reports

More News in this Category


Related Articles



Rating: 2.7 / 5 (15 votes)
Rate this article:
1/52/53/54/55/5

User Comments (9)

9. Posted by Tony on 07/17/2008, 03:25
The more gallons we all save the longer supply can stay ahead of demand, which will keep prices lower. The quicker we get these cafe standards up, the sooner the "hand me down" theory can kick in. We need people getting 30mpg to upgrade to 50mpg so that 16 mpg can get into the 30. At least 70mpg by 2030 should be the very obtainable goal. At the same time we need to be digging into alt. fuel from bio to if all else fails liquid coal. Though I think algae should be throughly explored. Hybrid biodiesel could be a realistic ticket, if we will actually do it.
8. Posted by jim gjurovich on 06/22/2008, 11:09
i dont believe that the ave. driver today drives 10k miles a year anymore. whats the ave. commute for the U.S. working class?
7. Posted by jim gjurovich on 06/22/2008, 11:09
i dont believe that the ave. driver today drives 10k miles a year anymore. whats the ave. commute for the U.S. working class?
6. Posted by James on 06/21/2008, 09:09
SUV owners will lap up the mathematical gymnastics of this. They`ll believe and do anything rather than give up their peacock feathers.
5. Posted by Don't Believe It on 06/21/2008, 00:03
It's obvious that the article is intending to steer consumers away from high MPG vehicles and into remaining with their larger, higher profit for the maker vehicles typically manufactured by US automakers. To say that you'll save more by using 500 gallons a year instead of 1000 rather than 200 instead of 500 is misleading at best. Of course it is a greater net loss, but last time I checked, 500 > 200. It's still better to drive the highest MPG vehicle for your needs.
4. Posted by Marty on 06/20/2008, 12:44
I agree with the comment posted by Dan. I have a paid for (a long time paid for) 1998 Nissan 200SX. It has been a dream car. It still gets 34-36 miles per gallon. It has 210,000 miles on it. So I roughly drive 21,000 miles a year. It has had only two relatively minor repairs. Why buy a new car? For me its a no brainer, more MPG means you use less fuel. How can these college students mentioned in your article not figure that out? I guess it all hinges on what "is" is.
3. Posted by john on 06/20/2008, 12:10
what an stupid argument. all he's saying is that going from 16mpg to 20mpg is RELATIVELY more efficient than going from a vehicle that gets 34mpg to 50mpg. here's the stupid calculation: 16mpg to gpm = 0.0625 20mpg to gpm = 0.05 the difference is 0.0125 34mpg to gpm = ~0.029 50mpg to gpm = 0.02 the difference is ~0.01 he's saying 0.0125 > 0.01 so going from 16 to 20mpg saves more gas. except somehow this seems to ignore the fact that driving a car of 20mpg for 100 miles uses 5 gallons where driving a car of 50mpg for 100 miles uses 2 gallons. how stupid. somebody wrote a stupid paper on this? why is this news? it has nothing to do with miles per gallon being misleading. his stupid argument is misleading. what oil company funded this study? stupid.
2. Posted by Dion on 06/20/2008, 11:18
this guys a fool. he uses extrems to prove his point but forgets. i dont know how he can make a case that going from 1000, to 500 when the person at 1000, can simpley get a mroe effecient vehicle ad go from 1000 to 200. but then that would ruin his foolish ideal
1. Posted by Dan on 06/20/2008, 10:28
What an agenda. MPG does is not an illusion in savings. When you compare two different examples as this article did then you are conning the reader. It all comes down the individual need - If your car gets 10mpg and you buy one that gets 20 mpg you will save money on gas driving the same miles. Here is another example - If you get 10mpg and have no car payments then buy a car for 30k that gets 30 mpg well guess what - you're 30k in the hole that would have been used for gas and that translate into 7500 gallons of gas for your old car to use. It would have been nice if the article did not use such con words as "Misled", "Illusion". Using mpg as a gauge is not a con or misleading way to determine your cost,etc,etc.

Comment on this article

Your Name
Text from the image
Comment
max 1200 chars
* All fields are required