August 20, 2008
Separating Above- and Belowground Effects of Alliaria Petiolata and Lonicera Maackii on the Performance of Impatiens Capensis
By Cipollini, Kendra A McClain, Georgette Y; Cipollini, Don
ABSTRACT. - Invasive plants can exert their effects on native plants through both above- and belowground mechanisms. In a fully factorial field study, we examined the effects of activated carbon addition and removal of aboveground biomass (i.e., cutting) on the survival, growth and reproduction of transplanted Impatiens capensis seedlings in habitats dominated by either Lonicera maackii (honeysuckle) or Alliaria petiolata (garlic mustard). Activated carbon can adsorb organic molecules, including potential allelochemicals. Cutting of A. petiolata increased survival and fruit production of I. capensis, while cutting of L. maackii increased survival and tended to increase fruit production. Carbon application tended to increase survival of I. capensis in A. petiolata-dominnted plots, but had no effect in L. maackii- dominated plots. The effects of carbon application on growth and fruit production of I. capensis depended upon the cutting treatment in A. petiolata - dominated plots. In plots where A. petiolata was not cut, carbon application increased height and fruit production. In plots where A. petiolata was cut, carbon application decreased height and tended to decrease fruit production. Impatiens capensis tended to survive longer when in competition with A. petiolata than with L. maackii. While carbon application may benefit native plant growth in the presence of A. petiolata, the addition of activated carbon after removal of aboveground biomass, a source of both allelochemicals and light competition, may have little benefit as an understory plant restoration tool.INTRODUCTION
In recent years, concern regarding invasive species has increased worldwide. In the United States alone, the economic impact of invasive species across taxonomic groups is approximately $120 billion per year; further, invasive species have been anecdotally identified as a threat, at least in part, for one-half of endangered or threatened species (Pimentel et al, 2005). Plants make up a significant portion of invasive species worldwide. The phenomenal success of invasive plants has been attributed to a variety of traits that provide advantages over native species (Levine et al, 2003) . Most generally, invasive plants may negatively impact other species through aboveground competition, especially for light (Braithwaite et al, 1989; Woods, 1993). Invasive plants that are successful competitors for light and reduce its availability to other species are likely to have major impacts in invaded communities.
Invasive plants may also affect other species through belowground mechanisms. In addition to competition for soil resources, most plant species produce some allelopathic compounds, such as monoterpenes or phenols, in their roots and leaves (Ehrenfeld, 2006). Germination, growth and reproduction of neighboring plants can be affected by these compounds as a result of their impacts on various physiological processes (Rice, 1974). Allelopathic compounds released by plants may have direct effects through plant-plant interference or may have indirect effects through altering soil chemical ecology (Inderjit and Weiner, 2001). The release of allelopathic compounds appears to contribute to the success of several important invaders of North America (Hierro and Callaway, 2003; Orr et al., 2005). In addition, allelopathic compounds produced by some plants may have greater effects on species that have not been exposed to such compounds in invaded habitats than on adapted species in their native range, a phenomenon known as the novel weapons hypothesis (Callaway and Ridenour, 2004).
The effects of allelopathy may be mitigated through the use of activated carbon, which specifically adsorbs organic molecules from aqueous solutions or soils with little effect on inorganic nutrients. Application of carbon to soils mitigated the phytotoxic effects of Centaurea maculosa on both conspecifics and other species (Ridenour and Callaway, 2001; Perry et al., 2005). Further, Festuca plants grown with carbon in the absence of C. maculosa were actually 20% smaller than those grown in the absence of carbon, suggesting that intrinsic effects of carbon are unlikely to be the cause of increased plant performance in the presence of a competitor (Ridenour and Callaway, 2001). Kulmatiski and Beard (2006) found that in fields that had experienced invasive species dominance for nearly 47 y, activated carbon application to field plots was effective in decreasing the frequency of invasive species, while increasing the abundance of native species. Activated carbon therefore provides a tool to investigate the importance of belowground influences of invaders on native plant individuals and communities, and may be useful in restoration activities.
There are two invasive species prominent in the Midwest that may exhibit allelopathic effects. Alliaria petiolata (Bieb.) Cavara & Grande (Brassicaceae), garlic mustard, is a biennial Eurasian herb, which was first introduced to North America for medicinal and culinary purposes (Nuzzo, 1993). This plant is a major herbaceous invader of forest understory and edge communities throughout North America. Alliaria petiolata plants have demonstrated negative effects on a wide range of native understory plant species, including Impatiens capensis (McCarthy, 1997; Meekins and McCarthy, 1999; Carlson and Gorchov, 2004; Hochstedler et al., 2007). The primary mechanism driving the success of A. petiolata is unknown, but allelopathy and resource competition are both probably important (Meekins and McCarthy, 1999; Vaughn and Berhow, 1999; Prati and Bossdorf, 2004). McCarthy and Hanson (1998) concluded that A. petiolata was successful because of its ability as a competitor, and that allelopathy was unlikely to be important. However, Vaughn and Berhow (1999) isolated two major glucosinolates from garlic mustard and suggested that these compounds can inhibit the germination and growth of mycorrhizal fungi, a result corroborated by Roberts and Anderson (2001). Stinson et al. (2006) recently demonstrated that A. petiolata does in fact negatively impact growth of several tree species through disruption of mycorrhizal mutualisms. Prati and Bossdorf (2004) showed that soil conditioning by A. petiolata inhibited germination of Geum species, an effect that could be mitigated with activated carbon. In addition to glucosinolates, other allelochemicals that garlic mustard contains include a variety of allyl and flavonoid glycosides and cyanide (Cipollini et al., 2005; Cipollini and Gruner, 2007).
Lonicera maackii (Rupr.) Maxim (Caprifoliaceae), Amur honeysuckle, is native to northeastern China, Korea, Siberia and Japan and was first introduced in North America for landscaping and wildlife habitat (Luken and Thieret, 1995). This shrub is a major woody invader of forest edges, old-fields and disturbed forest understories throughout eastern North America and the Midwest. Lonicera maackii is thought to negatively affect herbaceous plants, tree seedlings and spring ephemerals primarily through competition for light (Hutchinson and Vankat, 1997; Gould and Gorchov, 2000; Miller and Gorchov, 2004). Removal of L. maackii has been shown to increase survival and fruit production of Impatiens pallida (Gould and Gorchov, 2000). Hartman and McCarthy (2004) associated increased native seedling survival in plots where L. maackii had been removed with increased light availability. Gorchov and Trisel (2003) found that aboveground effects (i.e., shading) were more important than belowground effects on native tree seedlings, although the study focused on belowground resource competition rather than allelopathy. The allelopathic effects of leaf extracts of L. maackii on several woody and herbaceous species, including /. capensis, have been demonstrated (Cipollini and Doming, 2006; Cipollini et al, 2008a). In addition, Cipollini et al. (2008b) demonstrated the allelopathic potential of several phenolic metabolites in methanol extracts of leaves of L. maackii.
For these two invaders, debate still exists on the relative importance of aboveground versus belowground influences on native plant performance. In this study, we investigated the effect of removal of aboveground biomass (i.e., cutting) and activated carbon addition to field plots dominated by either Lonicera maackii or Alliaria petiolata on the performance of the co-occurring native annual herb Impatiens capensis Meerb. (Balsaminaceae) jewelweed. Impatiens capensis was chosen for this study due to its ready availability, the ability to measure reproduction in a single season and previous evidence that Impatiens species are negatively impacted by A. petiolata ana L. maackii (McCarthy, 1997; Gould and Gorchov, 2000). Cutting was intended to primarily ameliorate light competition, but may also remove a source of allelochemicals and may have increased soil moisture availability through a reduction in transpiration. Activated carbon addition was intended to mitigate the effects of putative allelochemicals in the soil, but may have other unknown effects on soil characteristics. We expected that I. capensis growing with uncut invasive species in the absence of activated carbon would exhibit the lowest seedling survival and growth, while treatments with cut invasive species and added activated carbon would exhibit the highest rates. The outcome of the other two treatment combinations would elucidate the extent to which each of these factors affected plant performance. We expected that cutting would be particularly beneficial for I. capensis in L. laaefa'wiominated plots, while activated carbon addition would particularly benefit performance of I. capensis in A. petiolataraommalea plots. The basis for this expectation is that L. maackii produces dense shade with an extended leaf phenology and has been shown to have strong aboveground effects (Gould and Gorchov, 2000; Gorchov and Trisel, 2003; Miller and Gorchov, 2004), which may be more important than the allelochemicals that it produces (Trisel, 1997; Doming and Cipollini, 2006; Cipollini et al, 2008a). In addition, research has demonstrated that A. petiolata affects soil composition and native plants through the release of allelochemicals (Prati and Bossdorf, 2004; Stinson et al, 2006), and it is unlikely to influence light availability for I. capensis as much as L. maackii due to its smaller stature. METHODS
We performed the study in a natural area adjacent to the Frank O. Hazard Arboretum of Wilmington College in Wilmington, Ohio, in 2006. The study area is found along Lytle Creek and contains a second- growth maple-beech-oak forest. The soil types in the study area are either Sloan silt loam or Sligo silt loam, which are considered floodplain soils (Garner and Meeker, 1962). For each invasive species, we used a fully factorial blocked design with the main factors of activated carbon (+or - ) and removal of aboveground biomass (+or - ). Treatments were replicated in four sites (or blocks) for each invasive species. The four sites per invasive species were independently selected based on the visually-even distribution of either second-year Alliaria petiolata or mature Lonicera maackii, taking care to avoid sites with both species. Sites were separated by no more than 0.5 km. There were very few other species present in the chosen invaded sites. We selected and prepared the sites on 28 Apr. and 5 May. Within each of the four main sites per invasive species, we established four 1-m^sup 2^ main plots, with six 100-cm^sup 2^ subplots, where Impatiens capensis would be subsequently transplanted. The treatment combinations were haphazardly assigned to each main plot in each site. For activated carbon treatments, we added 10 mile of activated carbon (Aquarium Pharmaceticals Black Magic Activated Carbon, Chalfont, Penn.) and mixed it into the first 8 cm of soil in each of the 100-cm^sup 2^ subplots. This ratio of activated carbon to soil volume has been shown to ameliorate allelopathic effects in other studies (Ridenour and Callaway, 2001; Prati and Bossdorf, 2004). We disturbed an equivalent area of soil at every subplot, regardless of whether carbon was applied, to control for soil disturbance effects. At the same time, for removal treatments, we cut and removed the aboveground biomass of each invasive species at the soil surface. For L. wiaaduwiominated areas, plots were located directly adjacent to the stem of the L. maackii plants. For A. petwlatctr dominated areas, plots were located in the midst of several A. petiolata individuals. Although removing aboveground biomass also certainly affected belowground competition, we did not kill the roots of either species, which remained alive and resprouted throughout the growing season. On 13 May we planted one I. capensis seedling, all of similar height and obtained locally witiiin the natural area, in each subplot in each main plot, yielding 96 experimental plants per invasive species (4 sites x 2 cutting treatments x 2 carbon treatments x 6 plants) . On 17 May we constructed cages using grade stakes and chicken wire and placed them over each of the main plots to protect the seedlings from herbivory and trampling by deer or ofher animals.
We measured height, number of fruits and survival of the seedlings on a bi-weekly basis after the transplants had been allowed sufficient time to establish in their new areas. Measurements began on 18Jun. and ended on 13 Aug. Because the exact day of death of experimental plants could not be determined, survival was determined by noting the sampling time period during which mortality occurred and assigning the interval a number from one to five. The maximum height and fruit number were determined for each plant that was not affected by vandalism or transplant stress. Plants that died prior to 16 Jul. were excluded from the analysis of maximum height and fruit number, as it was assumed that they were unable to successfully reproduce in this time period. A total of 23 plants were destroyed by vandalism in the Lonicera maackH-dominated plots. For the Alliaria petiolata experiment, there were 70 plants included in the height and fruit analysis, while for the L. maackii experiment, there were 38 plants included in the height and fruit analysis.
For each invasive species, the maximum fruit number, maximum height and interval of death for Impatiens capensis were analyzed using a three-way mixed model nested Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) , with the main random factor of site and the two fixed main factors of cutting and carbon application (Ryan et al., 2005) . In the ANOVA model, each /. capensis plant was nested in the interaction of cutting and carbon application which accounts for the nonindependence of the /. capensis plants in each main plot (Neter et al, 1996). The only interaction investigated in the ANOVA model was the interaction of cutting and carbon application, which was the primary interaction of interest. Data for the Alliaria petiolata and Lonicera maackii plots were analyzed separately. For L. maackii plots, the site factor was removed from the model because there were fewer data points due to vandalism and lower survival. The low sample size did not allow us to include this source of variation and this factor was not of primary interest. There was an outlier in the L. maackii plots that was excluded from the height and fruit data analysis in order to meet the model assumption of normality, which was tested using the Ryan-Joiner Mediod for all analyses (Ryan et al, 2005) . A failure-time analysis was not used for the survival data due to the non-independence of I. capensis plants within each plot, an important assumption of this statistical method (Fox, 1993). The relationship between fruit number and height was investigated using simple linear regression separately for data from the A. petiolata and L. maackii plots. To examine differences between L. maackii and A. petiolata plots, the average I. capensis height, fruit number and survival was determined for each site and then a simple t-test was performed using these four site averages per invasive species. The alpha level to determine significance was set at 0.05 for all tests.
For the Alliara /?iioiato-dominated plots, survival was significandy affected by site (F^sub 3, 49^ = 9.30, P
For the Lonicera maackii-dominated plots, cutting significantly increased survival (F^sub 1, 29^ = 40.88, P
Impatiens capensis lived longer, achieved greater maximum height and produced more fruits in Alliara petiolata plots compared to Lonicera maackii plots, although only the first was marginally significant (t = 3.00, P = 0.058; Fig. 4).
In the Alliara petiolata-dominated plots, Impatiens capensis benefited independently from both amelioration of above-ground effects and from application of activated carbon. Past research concerning the success of A. petiolata has implicated both light competition and allelopathy independently, and this is the first study to show the importance of the interaction of these factors. McCarthy and Hanson (1998) thought that the negative effects of A. petiolata on native species were most likely associated with aboveground competition and not allelopathy. Indeed, Meekins and McCarthy (1999) showed that first year rosettes of A. petiolata can compete successfully with some woody plant seedlings, but not with I. capensis. Here, we found that cutting of aboveground biomass of second-year A. petiolata increased reproduction and survival of I. capensis seedlings. Other studies have suggested that the negative effects of A. petiolata may be due largely to allelopathy toward native plants or their mycorrhizal mutualists (Vaughn and Berhow, 1999; Roberts and Anderson, 2001; Prati and Bossdorf, 2004; Stinson et al, 2006). It is possible that activated carbon benefited I. capensis plants in the presence of A. petiolata either directly or indirectly by protecting mycorrhizal symbioses. Further, when carbon was added to plots where A. petiolata was intact, growth, reproduction and survival reached levels approaching those found in plots where aboveground biomass was removed, suggesting that amelioration of soil allelopathy and above-ground competition have nearly equivalent effects on I. capensis. Interestingly, carbon application was only significantly beneficial to fruit number and height if aboveground biomass of Alliara petiolata was present and tended to had negative effects where aboveground biomass was removed. We have found that carbon addition to soils in the absence of invasive plant extract negatively impacted growth in Arabidopsis thaliana (K. Cipollini and R. Murphy, pers. obs.). It is possible that, in the absence of the aboveground biomass that can be both a source of allelochemicals and a source of photoassimilates required for root allelochemical production, activated carbon adsorbed molecules that were vital to Impatiens capensis survival and growth. Activated carbon may also have alternate effects in soils, including decreasing beneficial microbial activity in soil (Bais et al, 2005). This negative effect may have been particularly noticeable in the absence of allelochemicals that the carbon could adsorb.
Our statistical analysis of height and fruit data in the Lonicera maackii-dominated plots was constrained by low sample sizes, which limits our results and conclusions. Nonetheless, the results of this study indicate that aboveground competition by L. maackii is an important factor suppressing survival and reproduction of Impatiens capensis. On the other hand, activated carbon did not significantly improve the performance of I. capensis in L. maackii plots. Extracts from the roots and leaves of L. maackii are known to strongly suppress the germination of I. capensis and other species (Trisel, 1997; Doming and Cipollini, 2006), and the growth of Arabidopsis thaliana (Cipollini et al, 2008a), but carbon application was either unable to completely ameliorate allelopathic effects of L. maackii, or the potential allelopathic effects of this plant seen in the laboratory (e.g., Doming and Cipollini, 2006), do not extend to the field. Another explanation is that soil nutrients were too low to see the effects of allelopathy, as allelopathic effects of L. maackii can be attenuated by low nutrient levels (Cipollini et al, 2008a). However, the negative effect of carbon in the absence of aboveground biomass seen in the Alliaria pitiofata-dominated plots was also apparent in the L. maackii-dominated plots. This suggests that in the presence of L. maackii, activated carbon had enough benefits on the performance of I. capensis to counterbalance its negative effects seen in the absence of L. maackii. We will conduct future research with increasing levels of carbon to see if allelopathic effects can be alleviated with greater carbon application. Lonicera maackii had a greater impact on I. capensis survival than A. petiolata and is likely a larger threat to understory plants in general.
To our knowledge, this is the first study to attempt to separate the effects of aboveground competition and allelopathy of these two species on a native species in the field. While removal of aboveground competition of both Alliara petiolata and Lonicera maackii enhanced the performance of Impatiens capensis as expected, the application of activated carbon benefited target plants in the presence of intact invasive plants. This both confirms that these species exert some of their negative effects through allelopathy and suggests that activated carbon may be an important restoration tool in sites where removal of these invasive species is constrained.
Acknowledgments. - We would like to thank Elizabeth Ames, Caitlyn Combs, Robert Murphy and Lloyd McClain for assisting in the setup of the field portion of this study. Doug Burks, Don Troike, Doug Woodmansee and the students of BIO 440/441 provided valuable comments throughout the design and completion of this experiment. Comments from D. Gorchov and four anonymous reviewers improved the quality of this manuscript. We would also like to thank Wilmington College for the use of the Frank O. Hazard Arboretum and funding for the fencing materials.
BAIS, H. P., B. PRITHIVIRAJ, A. K. JHA, F. M. AUSUBEL AND J. M. VIVANCO. 2005. Mediation of pathogen resistance by exudation of antimicrobials from roots. Nature, 434:217-221.
BRAITHWAITE, R. W., W. M. LONSDALE AND J. A. ESTBERGS. 1989. Alien vegetation and native biota in tropical Australia: the impact of Mimosa pigra. Biol. Conserv., 48:189-210.
CALLAWAY, R. M. AND W. M. RIDENOUR. 2004. Novel weapons: invasive success and the evolution of increased competitive ability. Front. Ecol. Environ., 2:436-443.
CARLSON, A. M. AND D. L. GORCHOV. 2004. Effects of herbicide on the invasive biennial Alliaria petiolata (garlic mustard) and initial responses of native plants in a southwestern Ohio forest. Rest. Ecol, 12:559-567.
CIPOLLINI, D., R. STEVENSON AND K. CIPOLLINI. 2008a. Contrasting effects of allelochemicals from two invasive plants on the performance of a non-mycorrhizal plant. Int. J. Plant Sci., 169:371- 375.
_______ , _______ , S. ENRIGHT, A. EYLES AND P. BONELLO. 2008b. Phenolic metabolites in leaves of the invasive shrub, Lonicera maackii, and their potential roles in allelopathy. J. Chem. Ecol., 34:144-152.
_______ AND W. GRUNER. 2007. Cyanide in the chemical arsenal of garlic mustard, Alliaria petiolata. J. Chem. Ecol, 33:85-94.
_______ , J. MRAGWU, K BARTO, C. HILLSTROM AND S. ENRIGHT. 2005. Expression of constitutive and inducible chemical defenses in native and invasive populations of garlic mustard (Alliaria petiolata) . J. Chem. Ecol, 31:1243-1255.
DORNING, M. AND D. CIPOLLINI. 2006. Leaf extracts of the invasive shrub, Lonicera maackii inhibit seed germination of three herbs with no autotoxic effects. Plant Ecol, 184:287-296.
EHRENFELD, J. G. 2006. A potential source of information for screening and monitoring the impact of exotic plants on ecosystems. Biol. Invasions, 8:1511-1521.
FOX, G. A. 1993. Failure-time analysis: emergence, flowering, survivorship and other waiting times, p. 253-289. In: S. M. Scheiner and J. Gurevitch (eds.). Design and analysis of ecological experiments. Chapman and Hall, New York.
GARNER, D. E. AND R. MEEKER. 1962. Soil survey of Clinton County, Ohio. U. S. Department of Agriculture, Washington DC. 113 p.
GORCHOV, D. L. AND D. E. TRISEL. 2003. Competitive effects of the invasive shrub, Lonicera maackii (Rupr.) Herder (Caprifoliaceae) , on the growth and survival of native tree seedlings. Plant Ecol, 166:13-24.
GOULD, A. M. A. AND D. L. GORCHOV. 2000. Effects of the exotic invasive shrub Lonicera maackii on the survival and fecundity of three species of native annuals. Am. Midl. Nat., 144:36-50.
HARTMAN, K M. AND B. C. MCCARTHY. 2004. Restoration of a forest understory after the removal of an invasive shrub, amur honeysuckle (Lonicera maackii). Rest. Ecol, 12:154-165.
HIERRO, J. L. AND R. M. CALLAWAY. 2003. Allelopathy and exotic plant invasion. Plant Soil 256:29-39.
HOCHSTEDLER, W. W., B. S. SLAUGHTER, D. L. GORCHOV, L. P. SAUNDERS AND M. H. H. STEVENS. 2007. Forest floor plant community response to experimental control of the invasive biennial, Alliaria petiolata (garlic mustard). Bull. Torr. Bot. Club., 134:155-165.
HUTCHINSON, T. F. AND J. L. VANKAT. 1997. Invasibility and effects of amur honeysuckle in southwestern Ohio forests. Conserv. Biol, 11:1117-1124.
INDERJIT AND J. WEINER. 2001. Plant allelochemical interference or soil chemical ecology? Perspect. Plant Ecol. Evol. Syst., 4:3- 12.
KULMATISKI, A. AND K H. BEARD. 2006. Activated carbon as a restoration tool: potential for control of invasive plants in abandoned agricultural fields. Rest. Ecol., 14:251-257.
LEVINE, J. M., M. VILA, C. D'ANTONIO, J. S. DUKES, K GRIGULIS AND S. LAVOREL. 2003. Mechanisms underlying the impacts of exotic plant invasions. Proc R Soc. Land., B, Biol. Sci., 270:775-781.
LUKEN, J. O. AND J. W. THIERET. 1995. Amur honeysuckle (Lonicera maackii; Caprifoliaceae): its ascent, decline and fall. Sida, 16:479- 503.
MCCARTHY, B. C. 1997. Reponse of a forest understory community to experimental removal of an invasive nonindigenous plant (AUiaria petiolata, Brassicaceae) , p. 117-130. /n.J. O. Luken and J. W. Thieret (eds.). Assessment and management of plant invasions. Springer-Verlag, New York.
_______ AND S. L. HANSON. 1998. An assessment of the allelopathic potential of the invasive weed AUiaria petiolata (Brassicaceae). Castanea, 63:68-73.
MEEKINS, J. F. AND B. C. MCCARTHY. 1999. Competitive ability of AUiaria petiolata (garlic mustard, Brassicaceae), an invasive, nonindigenous forest herb. Int. J. Plant Sci., 160:743-752.
MILLER, K E. AND D. L. GORCHOV. 2004. The invasive shrub, Lonicera maackii, reduces growth and fecundity of perennial forest herbs. Oecologia, 139:359-375.
NETER, J., M. H. KUTNER, W. WASSERMAN AND C. J. NACHTSHEIM. 1996. Applied linear statistical models, 4th Edition. Richard D. Irwin, Inc., Burr Ridge, Illinois. 1408 p.
NUZZO, V. A. 1993. Distribution and spread of the invasive biennial AUiaria petiolata (garlic mustard) in North America, p. 115- 124. In: B. L. McKnight (ed.). Biological pollution: control and impact of invasive exotic species. Indiana Academy of Science, Indianapolis, Indiana.
ORR, S. P., J. A. RUDGERS AND K CLAY. 2005. Invasive plants can inhibit native tree seedlings: testing potential allelopathic mechanisms. Plant Ecol, 181:153-165. PERRY, L. G., G. C. THELEN, W. M. RIDENOUR, T. L. WEIR, R. M. CALLAWAY, M. W. PASCHKE AND J. M. VIVANDO. 2005. Dual role for allelochemical: (+-)-catechin from Centaurea maculosa root exudates regulates conspecific seedling establishment./ Ecol, 93:1126-1135.
PIMENTEL, D., L. LACH, R. ZUNIGA AND D. MORRISON. 2005. Update on the environmental and economic costs associated with alien-invasive species in the United States. Ecol. Econ., 52:273-288.
PRATI, D. AND O. BOSSDORF. 2004. Allelopathic inhibition of germination by AUiaria petiolata (Brassicaceae). Am. J. Bot, 91:285- 288.
RICE, E. L. 1974. Allelopathy. Academic Press, New York. 353 p.
RIDENOUR, W. M. AND R. M. CALLAWAY. 2001. The relative importance of allelopathy in interference: the effects of an invasive weed on a native bunchgrass. Oecologia, 126:444-450.
ROBERTS, K. J. AND R. C.ANDERSON. 2001. Effect of garlic mustard [AUiaria petiolata (Bieb. Cavara & Grande)] extracts on plants and arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi. Am. Midl. Nat., 146:146-152.
RYAN, B. F., B. L. JOINER AND J. D. CRYER. 2005. Minitab handbook: updated for release 14, 5th ed. Thomson Brooks/Cole, Belmont, California. 450 p.
STINSON, K. A., S. A. CAMPBELL, J. R. POWELL, B. E. WOLF, R. M. CALLAWAY, G. C. THELEN, S. G. HALLETT, D. PRATI AND J. N. KLIRONOMOS. 2006. Invasive plant suppresses growth of native tree seedlings by disrupting belowground mutualisms. PLoS Biol., 4(5): el40. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0040140.
TRISEL, D. E. 1997. The invasive shrub, Lonicera maackii (Rupr.) Herder (Caprifoliaceae): factors contributing to its success and its effect on native species. Ph.D. Dissertation. Miami University, Oxford, Ohio. 200 p.
VAUGHN, S. F. AND M. A. BERHOW. 1999. Allelochemicals isolated from tissues of the invasive weed garlic mustard (AUiaria petiolata) . J. Chem. Ecol, 25:2495-2504.
WOODS, K D. 1993. Effects of invasion by Lonicera tatarica L. on herbs and tree seedlings in four New England forests. Am. Midl. Nat, 130:62-74.
SUBMITTED 18 SEPTEMBER 2007 ACCEPTED 15 JANUARY 2008
RENDRA A. CIPOLLINI1 and GEORGETTE Y. McCLAIN2
Wilmington College, Wilmington, Ohio 45177
Wright State University, Department of Biological Sciences, Dayton, Ohio 45435
1 Corresponding aufhor: e-mail: [email protected]
2 Current address: Blanchester High School, 953 Cherry Street, Blanchester, Ohio 45107
Copyright American Midland Naturalist Jul 2008
(c) 2008 American Midland Naturalist, The. Provided by ProQuest LLC. All rights Reserved.