World Scientists Say Humans Causing Global Warming
Posted on: Tuesday, 7 June 2005, 12:20 CDT
LONDON -- Scientists, including those from the United States and China, threw down the gauntlet to world leaders on Tuesday saying mankind was the major source of global warming and urging action, one month ahead of a G8 summit.
As leaders of the Group of Eight industrial nations prepare to meet in Scotland -- with climate change and Africa at the top of the agenda -- a statement by the national science academies of 11 countries said: "It is likely that most of the warming in recent decades can be attributed to human activities.
"The scientific understanding of climate change is now sufficiently clear to justify nations taking prompt action," said the statement from the science academies of the G8 nations as well as China, India and Brazil.
While most scientists agree the burning of fossil fuels for transport and to generate electricity is a major contributor to potentially catastrophic climate change, the United States under President Bush is unconvinced.
British Prime Minister Tony Blair has made tackling global warming, with its rising sea levels, increases in droughts and floods and threats to the lives of millions of the world's poorest people, a key goal of his 2005 presidency of the G8.
"It is clear that world leaders, including the G8, can no longer use uncertainty about aspects of climate change as an excuse for not taking urgent action to cut greenhouse gas emissions," said Lord May, head of Britain's Royal Society national science academy.
He called U.S. policy "misguided" and noted that crucial to the international acceptance of the statement was the fact that leading scientists from three of the world's biggest developing world emitters China, India and Brazil had also signed it.
SILENCE ON TARGETS
Blair has called for global action to cut emissions of so-called greenhouse gases like carbon dioxide and insisted on a program of action to emerge from the G8 summit at Gleneagles, some 65 km (40 miles) from Edinburgh, on July 6-8.
But a leaked draft last month of the climate change declaration due from the summit was silent on the science and contained neither targets nor timetables.
The national science academies likewise avoided talk of targets, calling instead for "cost-effective steps" to cut greenhouse gas emissions and noting that any delays would increase the problems and therefore the costs.
But they also noted the potentially devastating impact of global warming on the poorest nations which lacked the money or infrastructure to cope with anticipated crop failures and water shortages, and called for international action to help.
Environment group Friends of the Earth welcomed the increased pressure the science statement would put on the G8 leaders but lamented the lack of concrete goals.
"G8 countries must accept their historic responsibility in creating the problem, and show genuine leadership through annual reductions in emissions," campaigner Catherine Pearce said.
"It is crucial that the entire world -- including the United States -- recognizes that there is a window of opportunity to avert potentially catastrophic climate change. Emissions must peak and decline within the next decade. The world must act now before it is too late," she added.
The 1997 Kyoto Protocol, which went into effect without United States support, targets carbon dioxide and five other gases that can trap heat in the atmosphere and are believed to be behind rising global temperatures that many scientists say are disrupting weather patterns.
The Bush administration opposes the treaty because officials believe it would raise energy prices and cost 5 million U.S. jobs.
The statement urged G-8 leaders and others to:
-- Acknowledge the threat of climate change is "clear and increasing."
-- Launch an international study to help set emission targets to avoid unacceptable impacts.
-- Identify cost-effective steps to take now to contribute to "substantial and long-term reduction in net global greenhouse gas emissions."
-- Work with developing nations to build there scientific and technological capacity.
-- Take a lead in developing and deploying clean energy technologies.
-- Mobilize the science and technology community to enhance research and development.
-----
On The Net:
Statement: http://www.royalsoc.ac.uk/document.asp?latest1&id3222
National Academy of Sciences: http://www.nationalacademies.org/
Source: By Jeremy Lovell/Reuters
Related Articles
- NASA-JPL Scientist Elected To National Academy Of Engineering
- CEA and National Academy of Television Arts and Sciences to Unveil Global Media Awards at the 2009 International CES
- American Specialty Health and the National Academy of Sports Medicine Unveil Innovative FitnessCoach Program
- EP Magazine Editor-In-Chief, Dr. Rick Rader, Inducted Into the National Academies of Practice
- Dynavax Chief Scientific Officer, Robert L. Coffman, Ph.D., Elected to National Academy of Sciences
- Statement of John Stanton, Vice President, National Environmental Trust on Today's NSR Ruling
- National Academies News: Coeur d'Alene Superfund Site
- US National Academies Fights Evolution Controversy
- National Academy of Engineering Elects Dr. John Bowers of Calient Networks
- Anderson Interns Bring a Fresh View to the National Academies
User Comments (0)


RSS Feeds