Quantcast

Global Warming Problems Await Obama’s Attention

December 15, 2008

Global warming has turned into a major ticking time bomb for President-elect Barack Obama.

Since former president Bill Clinton’s inauguration in 1993, summer Arctic sea ice has lost the equivalent of Alaska, California and Texas. Since Clinton’s second inauguration, the 10 hottest years on record have occurred. Global warming is accelerating. Time is close to running out, and Obama knows it.

“The time for delay is over; the time for denial is over,” he said on Tuesday after meeting with former Vice President Al Gore, who won a Nobel Peace Prize for his work on global warming.

“We all believe what the scientists have been telling us for years now that this is a matter of urgency and national security and it has to be dealt with in a serious way,” Obama was quoted as saying.

But for Obama to succeed there are powerful political and economic realities that must be overcome. Despite the urgency he expresses, it’s not at all clear that he and Congress will agree on an approach during a worldwide financial crisis in time to meet some of the more crucial deadlines.

Obama is hoping to spark a massive economic stimulus by pushing changes in the way Americans use energy, and produce greenhouse gases. He called it an opportunity “to re-power America.”

But environmental experts hope 2009 will be different after years of inaction on global warming. Obama replaces a president who opposed mandatory cuts of greenhouse gas pollution and it appears he will have a willing Congress. Also, next year, diplomats will try to agree on a major new international treaty to curb the gases that promote global warming.

Gore is encouraging the U.S. to make significant changes starting in January. “This year coming up is the most important opportunity the world has ever had to make progress in really solving the climate crisis.”

Scientists are increasingly anxious, talking more often and more urgently about exceeding “tipping points.”

“We’re out of time,” Stanford University biologist Terry Root said. “Things are going extinct.”

Since 1992, U.S. emissions have increased by 20 percent while countries such as China have more than doubled its carbon dioxide pollution in that time. World carbon dioxide emissions have grown faster than scientists’ worst-case scenarios. Methane, the next most potent greenhouse gas, suddenly is on the rise again and scientists fear that vast amounts of the trapped gas will escape from thawing Arctic permafrost.

Some scientists say the amount of carbon dioxide in Earth’s atmosphere has already pushed past the safe level.

Mike MacCracken, who was a top climate scientist in the Clinton administration, said that in the early 1990s many scientists figured that the world was about a century away from a truly dangerous amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere.

But scientists realized that harmful changes kick in at far lower levels of carbon dioxide than they thought. Now some scientists, but not all, say the safe carbon dioxide level for Earth is about 10 percent below what it is now.

“The situation is the equivalent of a five-alarm fire that has to be addressed immediately,” said Gore.

Some scientists are afraid that what’s happening with Arctic ice melt will be amplified so that ominous sea level rise will occur sooner than they expected. They predict Arctic waters could be ice-free in summers, perhaps by 2013, decades earlier than they thought only a few years ago.

Next year, diplomats are seeking a new treaty replacing the 1997 Kyoto Protocol, which set limits on greenhouse gases, and which the United States didn’t ratify. This time European officials have high expectations for the U.S. to take the lead. But many experts don’t see Congress passing a climate bill in time because of pressing economic and war issues.

“The reality is, it may take more than the first year to get it all done,” said Senate Energy Committee Chairman Jeff Bingaman, D-N.M.

Many say the worldwide financial meltdown is complicating everything.

Frank Maisano, a Washington energy specialist and spokesman who represents coal-fired utilities and refineries, sees the poor economy as “a huge factor” that could stop everything. He said that’s because global warming efforts are aimed at restricting coal power, which is cheap. That would likely mean higher utility bills and more damage to ailing economies that depend on coal production.

Obama is stacking his Cabinet and inner circle with advocates who have pushed for deep mandatory cuts in greenhouse gas pollution and even with government officials who have achieved results at the local level.

One of the first things Obama said he would do when he gets to Washington is grant California and other states permission to control car tailpipe emissions, something the Bush administration denied.

And fortunately, the incoming Congress will be more inclined to act on global warming. In the House, liberal California Democrat Henry Waxman’s unseating of Michigan Rep. John Dingell – a staunch defender of Detroit automakers – as head of the House Energy and Commerce Committee was a sign that global warming will be on the fast track.

However, Mother Nature is oblivious to the federal government’s future plans. Ironically, 2008 is on pace to be a slightly cooler year in a steadily rising temperature trend line. Experts say it’s thanks to a La Nina weather variation. While skeptics are already using it as evidence of some kind of cooling trend, it actually illustrates how fast the world is warming.

In 2008, the average global temperature is likely to wind up slightly under 57.9 degrees Fahrenheit, about a tenth of a degree cooler than last year. When Clinton was inaugurated, 57.9 easily would have been the warmest year on record.

Image Courtesy UPI




comments powered by Disqus