July 30, 2009
Encouraging Signs Of Recovery From Overfishing
Efforts to curb overfishing throughout the world are beginning to succeed in five of the world's ten large marine ecosystems, according to a comprehensive study published Thursday.
The new research comes just two years after a study that warned that overfishing could cause a collapse in the world's seafood stocks by 2048.
"I'm somewhat more hopeful ... than what we were seeing two years ago," he said.
The two-year, groundbreaking assessment on the status of marine fisheries and ecosystems had two goals: to examine current trends in fish abundance and exploitation rates (the proportion of fish taken out of the sea) and to identify which tools managers have applied in their efforts to rebuild depleted fish stocks.
The analysis is a significant step forward because it shows that the rate of fishing has been reduced in several regions around the world, resulting in some recovery of stock. Furthermore, it supports the case that sound management can contribute to the rebuilding of fisheries elsewhere.
Mr. Worm worked with Ray Hilborn of the University of Washington and an international team of 19 co-authors in compiling the analysis, which showed improvements for several regions in the U.S., Iceland and New Zealand.
"These highly managed ecosystems are improving" says Hilborn.
"Yet there is still a long way to go: of all fish stocks that we examined sixty-three percent remained below target and still needed to be rebuilt."
"Across all regions we are still seeing a troubling trend of increasing stock collapse," added Worm.
"But this paper shows that our oceans are not a lost cause. The encouraging result is that exploitation rate "“ the ultimate driver of depletion and collapse "“ is decreasing in half of the ten systems we examined in detail. This means that management in those areas is setting the stage for ecological and economic recovery. It's only a start "“ but it gives me hope that we have the ability to bring overfishing under control."
The authors warn that their analysis was primarily confined to intensively managed fisheries in developed countries, where scientific data on fish abundance is collected. They also emphasize that some excess fishing effort is simply displaced to countries with weaker laws and enforcement capacity.
While most of the fisheries that showed improvement are managed by a few wealthy nations, there are some notable exceptions. In Kenya, for example, scientists, managers, and local communities have collaborated to close some key areas to fishing and restrict certain types of fishing gear.
This led to an increase in the size and amount of fish available, and a consequent increase in fishers' incomes.
"These successes are local - but they are inspiring others to follow suit," says Tim McClanahan of the Wildlife Conservation Society in Kenya.
"We know that more fish can be harvested with less fishing effort and less impact on the environment, if we first slow down and allow overfished populations to rebuild," adds co-author Jeremy Collie from the University of Rhode Island.
"Scientists and managers in places as different as Iceland and Kenya have been able to reduce overfishing and rebuild fish populations despite serious challenges."
The researchers emphasize that a variety of management solutions are available to help rebuild fish stocks. A combination of approaches, such as catch quotas and community management coupled with strategically placed fishing closures, ocean zoning, selective fishing gear and economic incentives, offer promise for restoring fisheries and ecosystems, they say.
However "lessons from one spot need to be applied very carefully to a new area," says coauthor Beth Fulton of the CSIRO Wealth from Oceans Flagship in Australia.
"There are no single silver bullet solutions. Management efforts must be customized to the place and the people."
According to the analysis, Alaska and New Zealand have led the world in terms of management success by not waiting until drastic measures are needed to conserve, restore and rebuild marine resources. Other regions, such as Iceland, the Northeast U.S. Shelf and the California Current, are also recovering from overfishing, with fish abundance increasing above the long-term average.
This new study is a follow-up to a 2006 paper published in the journal Science by Worm and others, which highlighted a widespread global trend toward fisheries collapse.
That report led to a public disagreement between Worm and Hilborn, but the two have since recognized a shared sense of purpose.
They decided to collaborate on a more detailed assessment of the world's fisheries, and brought together many of the world's most accomplished fisheries scientists and ecologists for a two-year series of working groups at the National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis (NCEAS) in Santa Barbara, California. The current analysis is the result of those meetings.
"Prior to this study, evaluations of the status of world fish stocks and communities were based on catch records for lack of a better alternative. Results were controversial because catch trends may not give an accurate picture of the trends in fish abundance," explains Ana Parma of Centro Nacional Patag³nico in Argentina.
"This is the first exhaustive attempt to assemble the best-available data on the status of marine fisheries and trends in exploitation rates, a major breakthrough that has allowed scientists from different backgrounds to reach a consensus about the status of fisheries and actions needed."
The analysis includes catch data, stock assessments, scientific trawl surveys, small-scale fishery data and modeling results.
In looking at the tools that have been used to reduce exploitation rate, the authors said that "some of the most spectacular rebuilding efforts have involved bold experimentation with closed areas, gear and effort restrictions and new approaches to catch allocations and enforcement."
Laws that explicitly forbid overexploitation and specify clear rules and targets for rebuilding were seen as an important prerequisite, for example in the United States.
Although these tools have long-term benefits, the study suggests they also come with short-term costs to fishers.
"Some places have chosen to end overfishing," says Trevor Branch, a co-author from the University of Washington.
"That choice can be painful for fishermen in the short term, but in the long term it benefits fish, fishermen, and our ocean ecosystems as a whole."
Key among the group's recommendations is to fish at rates lower than those producing maximum sustainable yield (MSY), a long-standing and internationally accepted benchmark for total catch. They call for MSY to be reinterpreted as an absolute upper limit rather than a target, in line with U.N. recommendations.
The authors used ecosystem models to calculate a multi-species MSY (or MMSY) that adds up yield across all species, taking account of their interrelations. That analysis suggests that fishing below MMSY yields just as much fish as exceeding that benchmark, but has many ecological benefits including fewer species collapses, an increase in fish size and fish abundance.
"Below MMSY there is a fishing-conservation sweet spot," says co-author Steven Palumbi of Stanford University, "where economic and ecosystem benefits converge."
The team said that several other measures that can taken to reduce fishing impacts on ecosystems beyond reducing exploitation rates below MMSY.
"Fishing at maximum yield comes at a significant cost of species collapses," explains Heike Lotze, a co-author from Dalhousie University.
"But even low levels of fishing do change marine ecosystems and may collapse vulnerable species. That's why we require a combination of measures, including gear restrictions and closed areas, in order to meet both fisheries and conservation objectives."
The researchers caution that much work remains to be done to end global overfishing, as a large fraction of global fisheries are not properly managed, reported or regulated. This is particularly true outside wealthy industrialized nations, where prospects for reducing fishing mortality are often limited unless fishers get access to alternative sources of food and income. As a result, there is a need a more global perspective on rebuilding marine resources, the authors say.
"Fisheries managers currently presiding over depleted fish stocks need to become fast followers of the successes revealed in this paper," says Pamela Mace, a co-author from the New Zealand Ministry of Fisheries.
"We need to move much more rapidly towards rebuilding individual fish populations and restoring the ecosystems of which they are a part, if there is to be any hope for the long-term viability of fisheries and fishing communities."
The report appears in the July 31 issue of the journal Science.
On the Net:
- Dalhousie University
- University of Washington
- Wildlife Conservation Society
- University of Rhode Island
- CSIRO Wealth from Oceans Flagship
- National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis