Treaty Panel Urged To Reject Ivory Sale By Tanzania, Zambia
An international convention will meet next week to decide whether to grant requests from Tanzania and Zambia to lower the protection status of their elephants, allowing them to conduct one-time sales of stockpiled ivory.
An international team of 27 conservationists, writing in the March 12 edition of Science, says allowing the sale could lead to increased slaughter of elephants for their ivory throughout Africa. The team says there was a sharp increase in poaching even before 2007, when the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species approved a lower protection status for elephants in Botswana, Namibia, South Africa and Zimbabwe.
However, uncertainty about whether that action would further escalate poaching led the convention to impose a nine-year moratorium on ivory sales, but it was modified at the last minute so the moratorium only applied to those four countries.
The conservationists say Zambia and Tanzania are major sources and trafficking corridors for Africa’s illegal ivory, demonstrated by tons of contraband ivory seized in 2002, 2006 and 2009. DNA sampling on the 2002 and 2006 seizures traced the majority of that ivory back to those two nations.
“These two countries are at the center of the illegal ivory trade in Africa. It’s kind of unbelievable that their requests have gotten this far,” said Samuel Wasser, a University of Washington conservation biologist and lead author of the paper published in the Policy Forum section of Science urging that the sale not be allowed.
In the last 30 years African elephants have declined to about 35 percent of their original numbers, and their population today stands at less than 500,000.
An international ban on ivory trade was enacted in 1989, and for four years the elephant poaching level dropped dramatically. But largely because of that success, money for enforcement dwindled. In the meantime, ivory demand from China, Japan and Thailand led to a sharp increase in poaching since 2000.
“More than 8 percent of the elephant population is being poached annually,” Wasser said. “That rate of illegal take derails the laws of supply and demand, and makes it critical to maintain the moratorium until we have a better understanding of the impact of illegal trade and how it is affected by legal ivory sales.”
The international convention begins meeting Saturday (March 13) in Doha, Qatar, to consider, among other things, the petitions from Zambia and Tanzania for one-time sales from their national ivory stockpiles.
The convention imposes two levels of protection for elephants. The strictest level, which currently applies to both Zambia and Tanzania, does not allow any sales of ivory. To be allowed limited trade, the countries are supposed to demonstrate that their elephant populations are secure, that law enforcement is effective in combating poaching and that the ivory sales will not be detrimental to elephants.
However, neither nation has met any of the criteria, Wasser said. In addition, China and Japan, the only nations approved to import ivory, are among the largest consumers of illegal ivory and have done little to ensure the ivory they sell was obtained legally. That means they also have not met the convention’s standards for taking part in legal ivory trade.
“We’re making decisions that have a huge impact on the world’s ecosystems and we’re not relying on the best available science,” Wasser said. “This is a problem with the convention’s decisions in general, even the potential long-term impacts of those decisions is immense.”
Coauthors are Joyce Poole and Peter Granli of the advocacy group ElephantVoices; Phyllis Lee of the United Kingdom’s University of Stirling; Keith Lindsay, Harvey Croze and Cynthia Moss of Kenya’s Amboseli Trust for Elephants; Andrew Dobson of Princeton University; John Hart of Congo’s Tshuapa-Lomami-Lualaba Project; Iain Douglas-Hamilton, George Wittemyer and Lucy King of Kenya’s Save the Elephants (Note: Wittemyer is also with Colorado State University); Bethan Morgan of San Diego’s Institute for Conservation Research and Cameroon’s Central Africa Program; Jody Gunn of the United Kingdom’s Anglia Ruskin University; Susan Alberts and Patrick Chiyo of Duke University; Rene Beyers of the University of British Columbia; African wildlife author Richard Estes of New Hampshire; Kathleen Gobush of the University of Washington; Ponjoli Joram of Tanzania National Parks; Alfred Kikoti of the University of Massachusetts; Jonathan Kingdon, David MacDonald and Katarzyna Nowak of England’s University of Oxford; Benezeth Mutayoba of Sokoine University in Tanzania’ Steve Njumbi, formerly of the Kenya Wildlife Service; and Patrick Omondi of the Kenya Wildlife Service.
Image Caption: The tusks and face of an elephant killed for its ivory lie on the ground in an African forest. (Karl Ammann)
On the Net: