July 24, 2010
Scientists Reconstruct Human Remains Of Ancient Woman
Researchers say that a scientific reconstruction of one of the oldest sets of human remains found in the Americas supports theories that the first people who came to the hemisphere migrated from a broader area than once thought.
Mexico's National Institute of Anthropology and History released photos on Thursday of the reconstructed image of a woman who probably lived on Mexico's Caribbean coast 10,000 to 12,000 years ago.
However, government archeologist Alejandro Terrazas says the picture has become complicated because the reconstruction resembles people from southeastern Asian areas like Indonesia.
"History isn't that simple," Terrazas told the Associated Press (AP). "This indicates that the Americas were populated by several migratory movements, not just one or two waves from northern Asia across the Bering Strait."
Ripan Malhi, assistant professor of anthropology at the University of Illinois, told AP. "Using facial reconstructions to assign ancestry to an individual is not as strong as using ancient DNA to assess the ancestry of the individual, because the environment can influence the traits of the face."
"All of the current genetic evidence points to Northeast Asia as the main source for Native Americans," Malhi said.
However, there have been few opportunities to use DNA or other methods to identify the origins of the first inhabitants because only a handful of skeletons from 10,000 years ago survived.
The female is known as "La Mujer de las Palmas," or "The Woman of the Palms," after her remains were found near the Caribbean resort of Tulum by divers in 2002.
Her skeleton is about 90 percent intact and archaeologists and physical anthropologists calculated she was between 44 and 50 years old when she died.
The reconstructed model shows a stocky woman clad in a simple knee-length woven tunic. She had a broad face, prominent cheeks, thin lips, and little trace of the epicanthic eye-folds that characterize many modern Asian populations.
"Her body structure, skin and eyes are similar to the population of Southeast Asia," the institute said in a statement.
Susan Gillespie, an associate professor of anthropology at the University of Florida, said that while the Bering land bridge theory still has a lot of support, "the situation is messier than the straightforward scenario ... of big-game hunters chasing woolly mammoths over the exposed `Bering bridge' to Alaska."
"Recently there has been more serious inquiry into the various origins of migrants, modes of transportation, and dates of when they got here," Gillespie said in an e-mail message to AP's Mark Stevenson. "Dates for peopling of the Americas have been pushed way back, and with the finding of very early skeletal remains, the genetic/skeletal linkages to peoples of northeast Asia has become more cloudy."
However, she cautioned against comparing a reconstructed face from 10,000 years ago to modern populations because they have also probably changed over 10 millennia.
"You have to find skeletons of the same time period in Asia, or use genetic reconstructions, to make a strong connection, and cannot rely on modern populations," she wrote. "Do we have any empirical data on what Southeast Asian women looked like ... 10,000 years ago?"