September 17, 2010
Better Policing With Private Security?
New report by University of Leicester spin-out company
A new research report published today suggests the police service may have a resource in private security that could contribute to savings of up to £1 billion through collaboration and new ways of working as challenged by the Audit Commission and HMIC.
* Some police chiefs do not see private security as credible partners, and indeed see dangers in creating a two tier service based on an ability to pay.
* Others are prepared to accept that where private security is effective in patrolling they could deploy resources to more needy areas.
* Some police chiefs are especially resistant to using private security staff in public spaces and where police powers are necessary. But not all are, some are prepared to consider giving private security some powers so they can help more effectively.
* Some police chiefs have experimented with private security and not been impressed with the results.
* Some police interviewees, and particularly those with direct experience of working with the security sector, referenced cases where the private security sector had been highly effective and saw enormous untapped potential here.
* A key issue is that many said that private security had not presented the case effectively that it could offer value for money. Many said they failed to see the benefits of privatisation over civilianisation.
* At least three key benefits of sub-contracting emerged: it enabled the police to focus on their core tasks; it provided for the transference of risk to the contractor, although some argued that a significant risk to the police image or brand remained; and the skills, expertise and specialism of the sub-contractor can result in a better service than that provided by the police.
* Some police interviewees lamented the lack of leadership on working with private security, within the service but also within the security sector and within Government
* Some police leaders felt the police service as a whole lacked the business and managerial skills to manage sub contractors effectively, and this was a major impediment.
Moreover, a survey of Superintendents found that three quarters felt that the lack of accountability of the security sector was an impediment to closer working. Yet more than 8 in10 saw benefits in closer partnership working.
Professor Martin Gill who leads Perpetuity Research and Consultancy International, a spin-out company from the University of Leicester that conducted the study said:
'It is clear that the police service has not properly considered its position on private security. There are more private security officers than there are police officers and some senior officers clearly recognised the potential for enhancement and savings. Yet often, by their own admission, this has not been properly thought through. It seems that the police, the Government and ultimately the public are missing a trick. Properly managed, private security offer an option for supplementing police work, badly managed and they can undermine the perception of the police. Both positions are fairly founded but suggest a need for closer collaboration. The time is right for leaders in the police, private security and the Government to work together on the best models for engagement'.
Peter Davies, who is the ACPO lead on the private security sector said;
"We welcome this report and as an Association we supported Martin Gill and his team in their groundbreaking research. In tough financial times we need to consider every option available to keep people safe and help them to feel safe. The private security industry presents many opportunities but also risks. There are great examples of partnership in action but also uncertainty and doubt about how and whether to develop our relationship. This research is very informative and gives us a factual basis on which to discuss our future strategy."
On the Net: