Grizzly Bear May Lose Its Endangered Species Tag
The grizzly bear, considered by many as a totem of the American West, may soon lose protection under the Endangered Species Act.
Positioned as the “summit” species in the North American food chain, grizzlies fear no other animal.
Human fascination with the grizzly bear is such that when spotted even at a distance in Yellowstone National Park, the bear is guaranteed to bring traffic to a screeching halt and create a massive jam.
But it has not always been so.
Once viewed as a major menace to livestock, so many grizzlies were hunted, trapped and poisoned that, by 1975, no more than 225 of the beasts remained in Yellowstone.
The grizzly was one of the first species enrolled on the Endangered Species List, counted as a “threatened species.”
For the past 30 years, the Interagency Grizzly Bear Study Team has been trapping, radio-collaring and studying hundreds of the great bears throughout the Greater Yellowstone ecosystem as their number increased.
Their work is evaluated by a committee made up of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, U.S. Geological Survey Biological Resources, National Park Service, U.S. Forest Service, Wyoming, Idaho and Montana fish and game departments, and Montana State University.
With more than 600 grizzlies now in the Yellowstone ecosystem, the committee believes it’s time to declare the recovery a success and remove the great bear from Endangered Species protection.
The possibility of eliminating protections for Ursus arctos horribilis in Yellowstone is causing some conservation groups to break out in a cold sweat while others are saying, “It’s about time.”
Chris Servheen, grizzly bear recovery coordinator for the Fish and Wildlife Service for a quarter of a century, said if the proposal is approved in Washington, it will go out for public comment before a final decision. Actual removal of the bear from the Endangered Species List, if warranted, won’t happen this year.
Yellowstone is one of six recovery areas for bears in the Northwest. It is unique in that it is isolated by 100 miles from any of the others or from Canada.
From the time of listing, the interagency team has radio- collared and monitored bears to track cub production, mortality causes, habitat destruction and fluctuations in primary foods that include army cutworms, trout and carion.
“Today, we’re seeing bears in places we never saw them before,” Servheen said, “in huge areas of the entire 13-million-acre ecosystem where there were no bears.”
Even so, some conservationists argue that simply considering numbers alone isn’t a guarantee of survival without protections.
The New York-based Natural Resources Defense Council vociferously opposes removing protections.
