Intelligent Design is Supported By Facts

Donald Kaul’s “Intelligent design is not so intelligent” did not list any scientific facts either for evolution or against intelligent design.

May I offer a few facts? Number one: Many “facts” supporting evolution have been exposed as mistakes and lies. The book “Buried Alive,” by orthodontist Dr. Jack Cuozzo, proves — with photos — that many Neanderthal skull and jawbone pairs have been deliberately misaligned to make the jawbone protrude when, in fact, they fit perfectly in modern human alignment. His expose of esteemed international museums and doctoral “experts” deliberately deceiving the public in order to sustain their reputations is eye-opening.

Unfortunately, as new students invest their lives in advanced studies based on evolution, they, too, are caught in this grand deception.

Number two: The theory of evolution contradicts the second law of thermodynamics, namely that everything tends toward lower energy or disorder. Scientifically, a law outranks a theory.

Number three: The scientifc mathematical probability that something as complex as a single strand of DNA, let alone the brain, reproductive system or cardiovascular system, could develop by chance is approximately zero.

Number four: The existence of pairs of mutually dependent species such as the yucca plant and yucca moth, neither of which can reproduce without the other, have a zero probability of evolving at the same point in evolutionary history.

Many scientists setting out to disprove intelligent design have discovered it is better supported by scientific facts than evolution.

Darwin himself admitted that the evolutionary theory has many problems. I applaud President Bush and Sen. Bill Frist for being open-minded and desiring our children the chance to explore all reasonable scientific theories regarding the origin of man without the bias of those “experts” who deceived our generation.

That scientist of scientists, Sir Isaac Newton, who invented calculus and discovered the laws of motion and gravity, by means of logical analysis, concluded that “It is un-philosophical to seek for any other origin of the world, or to pretend that it might arise out of a chaos by the mere laws of nature.” — Opticks, 1704.

Jennifer G. Darst

Rural Minier