Cardinal backs evolution and “intelligent design”

By Tom Heneghan, Religion Editor

PARIS (Reuters) – A senior Roman Catholic cardinal seen as
a champion of “intelligent design” against Darwin’s explanation
of life has described the theory of evolution as “one of the
very great works of intellectual history.”

Vienna Cardinal Christoph Schoenborn said he could believe
both in divine creation and in evolution because one was a
question of religion and the other of science, two realms that
complimented rather than contradicted each other.

Schoenborn’s view, presented in a lecture published by his
office on Tuesday, tempered earlier statements that seemed to
ally the Church with United States conservatives campaigning
against the teaching of evolution in public schools.

A court in Pennsylvania is now hearing a suit brought by
parents against a school district that teaches intelligent
design — the view that life is so complex some higher being
must have designed it — alongside evolution in biology class.

“Without a doubt, Darwin pulled off quite a feat with his
main work and it remains one of the very great works of
intellectual history,” Schoenborn declared in a lecture in St.
Stephen’s Cathedral in Vienna on Sunday.

“I see no problem combining belief in the Creator with the
theory of evolution, under one condition — that the limits of
a scientific theory are respected,” he said.

Science studies what is observable and scientists overstep
the boundaries of their discipline when they conclude evolution
proves there was no creator, said the cardinal, 60, a top
Church doctrinal expert and close associate of Pope Benedict.

“It is fully reasonable to assume some sense or design even
if the scientific method demands restrictions that shut out
this question,” said the cardinal.

JUST A MISUNDERSTANDING?

Schoenborn, who ranked among the papal hopefuls last April,
caused an uproar in the United States last July with a New York
Times article that seemed to say the Church no longer accepted
evolution and backed intelligent design.

Proponents of intelligent design argue that Darwin’s
natural selection theory is flawed and alternatives should be
taught.

Scientists reject this as a disguised form of Creationism,
the literal belief in Creation as described in the Bible and
barred by the U.S. Supreme Court from being taught in public
schools.

Even Catholic scientists, including chief Vatican
astronomer Rev. George Coyne S.J., contested Schoenborn’s view.

In his lecture, Schoenborn said his article had led to
misunderstandings and sometimes polemics. “Maybe one did not
express oneself clearly enough or thoughts were not clear
enough,” he said. “Such misunderstandings can be cleared up.”

Schoenborn said he believed God created “the things of the
world” but did not explain how a divine will to bring about
mankind would have influenced its actual evolution.

“They were so to speak let free into their own existence,”
he said.