Differentiate Science and Religion
Posted on: Sunday, 9 October 2005, 03:00 CDT
I have read with interest recent letters regarding the debate over intelligent design vs. evolution. Rather than debate scientific details or specific religious beliefs, I'd like to summarize the two opposing philosophies and propose an alternate viewpoint.
Belief in intelligent design is based on Scripture and religious teachings. This explanation for life cannot be challenged. Scripture cannot be re-written. Either observations fit the holy passages, or the observations are revised or discarded. This philosophy of faith - which by definition must operate independently of facts - provides believers with absolute, unchangeable, sacred truths. It also provides comfort and gives meaning to the world.
Theories, such as evolution, are born of observations. When new discoveries do not fit prevailing theory, the theory must be revised. Recent study of fossils does not support Darwinian evolution - that life evolved by slow, steady change. Instead, fossils indicate that change occurs sporadically, sometimes quickly, sometimes slowly or not at all. The theory of evolution has evolved to coincide with the data, and the Darwinian model was replaced with that of punctuated equilibrium.
This method of truth-seeking is based on observation, hypothesis and testing. If the data fit the hypothesis, only then is a theory established. This method is more than abstract philosophy. It is fundamental to the development of industry, medicine, transportation and other tangible aspects of modern life.
It is my contention that religion and science operate by different rules and have different purposes. Science cannot fulfill a fundamental, spiritual need that most Americans have, and upon which our country was founded. Religion cannot be substituted for science with any hope of maintaining the technologically advanced society we enjoy.
It is important that we recognize the difference between science and religion; practice them freely but separately within their appropriate venues. Do not muddle and confuse the two.
Garrett Weiss
Grovetown
(Editor's note: The writer is a registered professional geologist with the city of Augusta's engineering department.)
Source: Augusta Chronicle, The
Related Articles
- Molecular Decay Of Gene In Toothless Mammals Supports Theory Of Evolution
- Kay Renz PR to Workout Publicity Routine for Adriana Martin, Founder of Fit Mom For Life
- Posit Science is Best in Brain Fitness Says Best Life
- Scientists Say Evolution Fits: Classroom Off-Limits to Other Teachings, Group's Book Asserts
- The "Theory of Evolution" Is a Misnomer
- Shari Lowe: Darwin's Theory Of Evolution
- 'Theory' Backs Evolution
- Scientific Evidence Leads to Theory of Evolution
- The Theory of Evolution is Real, but Threatened By Ignorance
- Observer Magazine: Life: Health: These Genes Don't Fit: Not All Human Traits Suggest a Team Effort in Preservation, Says Oliver James
User Comments (0)

RSS Feeds