Quantcast
  • E-mail
  • Print
  • Comment
  • Font Size
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Discuss article

Judge: Forest Service's Use of Fire Retardant Broke Law

Posted on: Monday, 31 October 2005, 18:00 CST

By The Associated Press

GRANTS PASS, Ore. -- The U.S. Forest Service violated environmental laws, including the Endangered Species Act, when it failed to go through a public process to consider the dangers of fire retardant drops that have killed thousands of fish, a judge has ruled.

The Forest Service decision not to comply with the National Environmental Policy Act on the dangers of using toxic fire retardants "appears to be a political decision," District Judge Donald W. Molloy in Missoula, Mont., wrote in the decision released Tuesday.

Molloy ordered the Forest Service to prepare a formal environmental analysis of the effects of fire retardant on the environment and consult with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service on the potential harm to endangered fish, but did not bar the Forest Service from using fire retardant until it complied.

Andy Stahl, executive director of Forest Service Employees for Environmental Ethics, which brought the lawsuit, said the group did not ask the judge to bar the use of toxic fire retardants. Instead, the organization, based in Eugene, hopes the ruling will lead the Forest Service to stop fighting wildfire like a war and start managing it as a natural part of the ecosystem.

"For 100 years the Forest Service has fought fire rather than manage it," said Stahl. "It's a wake-up call to say, 'Hey, you've got to look at the big picture.' There are alternatives and we need to get smarter about fire."

Forest Service spokeswoman Heidi Valetkevitch said the agency was reviewing the ruling, but as a matter of policy did not comment on legal matters.

The judge did not elaborate on the political decision comment, but environmentalists and Democrats have been complaining that Bush administration political goals of repealing environmental laws are motivating Forest Service decisions.

Stahl's organization filed the lawsuit in 2003, a year after 1,000 to 2,000 pounds of toxic retardant were dropped in Fall Creek in Central Oregon, killing more than 20,000 fish in six miles of the stream. Unknown numbers of fish died as the poison flowed into the Deschutes River.

Molloy found that the Forest Service uses an average of 15 million gallons of retardant a year, and in some years up to 40 million gallons, as it supplies planes under contract around the country to fight fire. From August 2001 through December 2002, retardant was dropped in water inhabited by endangered species eight times, six of them on national forest lands.


Source: Columbian

More News in this Category


Related Articles



Rating: 2.9 / 5 (13 votes)
Rate this article:
1/52/53/54/55/5

User Comments (0)

Comment on this article

Your Name
Text from the image
Comment
max 1200 chars
* All fields are required