Food Supply Attack: Costly, Not Disastrous
Posted on: Wednesday, 9 November 2005, 00:00 CST
Chicago scientists say a terror attack on the U.S. food supply could cause more casualties than Sept. 11 and cost the economy many billions of dollars.
But the scientists at the Institute of Food Technologists say research on consumer diet choices and existing food supply systems indicates terrorists would find it difficult to cripple the nation in the long-term.
The observations were shared in Chicago last week during the National Food Protection and Defense Research Conference.
Experts say more research is needed to determine ways to protect the food supply chain, as well as quickly identifying contaminants, predicting consumer reaction to attack, and on crisis response systems.
But food economists believe the diverse diets of Americans make it difficult to choose a single food to attack that would sufficiently reach every consumer. And the diversity of suppliers producing the same products ensures the likelihood that safe food could still reach consumers.
However, economists admit an assault on the national economy might cost $200 billion or more during the five years following the attack.
The Institute of Food Technologists, which hosted the conference, is a non-profit scientific society with 22,000 members working in food-related professions.
Source: United Press International
Related Articles
- AMR Research Bolsters Supply Chain Coverage with New Hires
- Leading Food Allergy Research and Advocacy Groups Merge to Find Cure for Life-Threatening Childhood Disease
- Dried Food in China Databook Supplies Actual Data to 2006 and Full Forecasts to 2011
- Cloned Food 'Safe' Despite Consumer Fears
- New Warning for Canned Tuna: Mercury Risk for Pregnant Women Too High, Consumer Reports Says
- High Food Costs Cause Consumer Prices to Rise
- Will the New Food Labels Do What They Say on the Tin? The Planned Traffic-Light System is Just One of an Array of New Food Labelling Systems. Will They Transform the Health of Shoppers or Add to the Confusion?
- Energy, Food Costs Boost Consumer Prices
- Nutrition-Education Programs Can Help Low-Income Consumers, Experts Say
- Chicago-Based Consumer Group Says FCC Decision Is a Mixed Bag
User Comments (0)

RSS Feeds