Quantcast

In Arctic, Global Warming Evidence Mounts

November 21, 2005

By Alister Doyle, Environment Correspondent

HARSTAD, Norway — Life is harsh on the freezing tundra of the Arctic Circle where Anna Prakhova lives. But it can be much harder when snows do not fall.

In recent years, snows have failed to fall as normal across large parts of the barren land dotted with low birch and pines.

“We are experiencing the reality of climate change,” Prakhova, who leads a group representing indigenous people in Russia and the Nordic nations, said on a snow-free day in Harstad, a Norwegian Arctic port of about 15,000 people.

Evidence that humans are pushing up global temperatures is growing ever stronger, ranging from a shrinking of ice in the Arctic to a warming of the Indian Ocean, many experts say.

The scientific panel that advises the United Nations looks likely to issue sterner warnings in its next report in 2007 that emissions of heat-trapping gases from power plants, factories and cars are disrupting the climate, they say.

And mounting conviction among experts may add pressure on governments, who next meet for climate talks in Montreal, Canada, from November 28 to December 9, to do more about a problem that could cost trillions of dollars to fix in coming decades.

“There is stronger and stronger evidence that there is an anthropogenic (human) element affecting the climate,” said Paal Prestrud, head of the Center for International Climate and Environmental Research in Oslo.

The 10,000 delegates to the Montreal talks will discuss how to fight climate change, especially after 2012 when the UN Kyoto Protocol on curbing greenhouse gas emissions runs out.

Prakhova is more worried about what is happening now.

She said reindeer, traditionally herded by Sami people — who live in Russia, Finland, Sweden and Norway — were vulnerable when winter snows did not fall.

“Snow is cold for us but for reindeer it is a soft winter bed,” said Prakhova, a Russian Sami. Lack of snow also makes it hard for reindeer to feed on lichen because the plants can get covered by sharp ice, which cuts their soft muzzles.

ARE WE TO BLAME?

In September, polar ice contracted to its smallest size in at least a century, according to measurements by space agency NASA and the U.S. National Snow and Ice Data Center.

Around Harstad, less bone-chilling winters have helped some pests to thrive, like beetles and worms that destroy Arctic forests. In northern Russia, frogs have been spotted more often on the tundra and some birds are not even bothering to migrate.

The idea that humans are to blame is growing: a survey this year by scientists at the U.S. Scripps Institution of Oceanography showing a warming of the Pacific, Atlantic and Indian Oceans over recent decades has been among the strongest evidence that human activities are responsible.

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), of scientists who advise the United Nations, concluded in its last report in 2001 that: “There is new and stronger evidence that most of the warming observed over the last 50 years is attributable to human activities.”

Most research since 2001 has downgraded theories that swings in the power of the sun, volcanic dust or warmth from cities are mainly to blame for rising temperatures, rather than emissions of carbon dioxide from burning fossil fuels.

“Based on new research, which is already available in the journals, we can say that there is stronger evidence about the human influence” on the climate, said Albert Klein Tank of the Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute. He is among scientists working on the next IPCC report, due in 2007.

GUESSING GAME

But there is still huge uncertainty about the impact of warming. IPCC reports say climate change might bring more powerful hurricanes, heatwaves, droughts and raise sea levels by almost a meter (3 ft) by 2100.

Other scientists say humans will be able to adapt, arguing that IPCC models may be wrong. They point, for instance, to a lingering dispute about whether temperatures are rising more slowly higher in the atmosphere than at the surface.

“I don’t see the catastrophic effects from warming that others predict,” said John Christy, a professor at the University of Alabama in Huntsville who says satellite data since 1979 shows temperatures rising fastest at the surface.

“All I can offer is guesses,” he said of the temperature discrepancy. “Perhaps as the surface warms the atmosphere has a capacity to release warmth to space in a way the climate models don’t take into account.”

Environmentalists say that any suggestion that humans are causing warming “beyond a reasonable doubt” might spur lawsuits against nations accused of doing too little. Environmentalists often single out the United States and Australia as laggards.

Those two countries are the main rich nations outside Kyoto, which demands cuts in emissions of 5 percent below 1990 levels by 2008 to 2012. Nations will have to curb fossil fuel use and shift to clean energy like wind or solar power.

President George W. Bush pulled out in 2001, arguing that Kyoto would be too costly and wrongly excluded poor nations from a first round of cuts. He says more research is needed and is investing heavily in technology like pollution-free hydrogen.

There is growing evidence that time is of the essence, especially for people like Prakhova who live on the front-line of climate change.

A report by 250 experts late last year said that the Arctic was warming twice as fast as the rest of the globe. That could push polar bears toward extinction and leave the Arctic Ocean ice-free in summers by 2100.

(Additional reporting by Anna Mudeva in Amsterdam)


Source: reuters



comments powered by Disqus