Group Assails EPA Rule Changes The Proposal Would Raise the Threshold for Industrial Sites to Report Some Chemical Releases.
Posted on: Tuesday, 20 December 2005, 18:00 CST
By BRANDON LARRABEE
ATLANTA -- Georgians could lose access to detailed information about thousands of pounds of hazardous chemicals being pumped into the air, water and land, according to a report released Thursday by a statewide interest group.
The Georgia Public Interest Research Group, or PIRG, said the changes proposed by the federal Environmental Protection Agency would take some dangerous chemicals and even some industrial plants off the books when it comes to detailed public reporting. But the EPA said the group is simply fear mongering.
"This is another example of the Bush Administration and the federal government . . . rolling back environmental regulations and really stomping on the people's right to know," said Jill Johnson of PIRG.
Essentially, the EPA rule change would raise the point at which industrial sites have to report the level of certain chemicals being released into the environment to the Toxics Release Inventory from 500 pounds to 5,000 pounds. There are more than 680 chemicals on the list tracked by the agency.
Companies began reporting to the inventory, born out of concerns over a chemical disaster in India, in 1987. Sunday marks the 26th anniversary of that disaster.
Any plant releasing, transferring or disposing of between 500 and 5,000 pounds of the chemicals would simply have to report the name of the substances.
"The shorter 'Form A' merely lists the chemical released and does not include any of the specific amounts of the chemical that was released to the environment," according to the PIRG report.
The group also said the threshold on the more detailed reporting for some of the most dangerous chemicals, which have a lower trigger right now, would also be raised.
In all, Georgia would lose the detailed information entirely on 134 sites across the state. Nearly 190 ZIP codes would lose at least some information on the chemicals being released. The group used 2003 reports in coming up with the information.
King & Prince Seafood Corp., Allied Universal Corp. and a Georgia- Pacific treating facility would no longer have to report detailed information on their emissions from the Brunswick locations, according to the PIRG report. (However, the report said Allied Universal didn't report any emissions in 2003.)
Glynn County residents in four ZIP codes wouldn't have access to information on about 15,000 pounds of chemicals, out of a total of more than 27 million pounds in those areas. For one Camden ZIP code, detailed reports wouldn't be required for almost 1,800 pounds out of almost 10 million pounds released.
Compared to the totals, those numbers might seem insignificant, Johnson said.
"When it comes to an individual community . . . that's a pretty big deal," she said.
Johnson also credited the "spotlight" the report brings to toxic chemicals with leading to a reduction of emissions in recent years.
But Kim Nelson, the assistant EPA administrator who oversees the Office of Environmental Information, accused PIRG of playing "fast and loose with the facts as scare tactics."
Nelson said first responders would still be able to get important information about toxic chemicals at the industrial sites. And she compared the ability to file the "Form A" to taxpayers' ability to use a shorter form to file their income tax returns each year.
"They still have to report every chemical," Nelson said. "The only difference is, they would report a little less information."
In all, Nelson said, less than 1 percent of the data collected on industrial emissions would be lost under the proposals. She said most of the current thresholds were set up years ago, before the EPA had the necessary information to figure out what levels of chemicals needed to be more carefully documented.brandon.larrabee@morris.com, (404) 681-1701LOCAL PLANTS AFFECTEDPlants that reported chemical waste that would no longer have to file detailed information on those releases, according to a report released by a public-interest group Thursday.PLANT POUNDS OF WASTE (2003)King & Prince Seafood Corp. 4,540Allied Universal Corp. 0Georgia-Pacific 3,840Source: Georgia Public Interest Research Group
Source: Florida Times Union
Related Articles
- Aflex Unveils Revolutionary New Hose Design for the Chemical and Process Industry
- New Release of CisionPoint Public Relations Software Platform Measures ROI and Value of Media Relations Campaigns
- Major Physician Group Issues Statement in Support of Physician/Industry Relationships
- Data-Rite Systems Group, Inc. Releases SHO-Time - Automate Filing of Form SH
- This Comprehensive Report on the Growth of Sensors in the Chemicals and Petrochemicals Industries is Out Now
- Most Influential Events for Korea's Fine and Specialty Chemical and Pharmaceutical Industries to Be Held in November
- The Beverage Information Group Releases Its 2008 Wine & Spirits Industry Marketing Handbook
- Intercap Merchant Partners Releases Its Food and Beverage Industry Corporate Finance Data Book for First Half 2007
- AlliedBarton Security Services Assists Chemical and Petrochemical Industry With New Federal Security Regulations
- Fullscope Partners With Microsoft at the 2005 FSA Suppliers Expo & Conference As Fullscope Announces the Second Release of Their High Tech Industry Solution for Axapta
User Comments (0)

RSS Feeds