Storm Water Ordinance Gets OK -- No Fees Yet; Maximum Fine is $1,000
Posted on: Wednesday, 21 December 2005, 09:00 CST
By Wayne Risher risher@desotoappealcom
DeSoto County supervisors passed a storm water ordinance Monday but included no fees and set the effective date at Nov. 1, 2006.
The Board of Supervisors voted 5-0 to enact the rules, which carry maximum fines of $1,000 a violation.
Later, the board delayed until Thursday a proposal to seek state legislation to create a storm water utility district that would oversee storm water rules and drainage issues.
The storm water ordinance affects a laundry list of everyday facilities and activities: commercial car washes and laundries, spilled oil or chemicals, radiator flushing, improper disposal of toxic fluids from households or automobiles, and discharges from septic tanks.
The ordinance spells out precautions that developers must take to prevent silt and other substances from washing off construction sites into streams, rivers and lakes.
It exempts industrial discharges that have separate permits and the water used in firefighting.
The county was under the gun from state Department of Environmental Quality officials to approve the ordinance this year and put it into effect next year, assistant county engineer Scott Young said.
Counties and cities are required to guard against pollution of water that runs off after rain storms as part of an unfunded mandate by the federal government.
DeSoto County, Southaven, Olive Branch and Horn Lake have until March 2008 to fully comply with federal clean water rules, but the feds haven't provided money for the extra paperwork and monitoring required under the law.
Young said officials haven't figured out yet the costs associated with the ordinance, including the number of employees that will be needed to enforce it.
Some drainage inspectors already work in the county Department of Road Management.
Department manager Russell Dorris said, "It may be we're able to work with existing employees, but we don't think so."
The effective date is one month after the county's next fiscal year begins. That should allow enough time to figure out the staffing and fee requirements.
Supervisor Allen Latimer asked about a provision calling for fines to be assessed per day that a violation occurs.
Young said the penalty provisions were patterned after those in other areas of the state. If a violation is bad enough, authorities probably would put a stop-work order on it to prevent a continuing problem, he added.
Latimer said, "I know it's got to be steep, or people wouldn't do it."
- Wayne Risher: (901) 333-2031
Source: Commercial Appeal, The
Related Articles
- Metropolitan Statement on Near-Term Water Funding, Conservation Package Introduced By State Senate, Assembly Leaders
- Land Rush, Runoff Threaten Inner Coast's Water, Shellfish: Coastal Counties Are Just Starting to Act, and Many Developers Exploit Lax State Rules
- State Rules Conflict in Wilmington Landfill Case
- Local Unease Over Sludge Fuels Debate: Suppliers and Farmers Favor State Rules That Govern the Use of the Sewage Material on Farmland. A County Advisory Council Seeks Answers to Health Concerns.
- State Rules Weren't Followed With Lode Logging Plan
- County Farmers Losing Livestock Aid: State Grant Cut As Ecology Rules Tighten
- DEP Found in Violation of State Law AG: Documents Withheld in Androscoggin Cleanup
- Nassau County DA Charges Seven With Violating NY State Environmental Law
- Ruling Washes State Agency Out of a Water Fight The Natural Resources Department Has No Jurisdiction in an Underground Vs. Surface Dispute, the State High Court Says.
- CWA Cites Comcast for Repeated Violations of FCC Rule
 |
 |
User Comments (0)
RSS Feeds