New Model May Explain Magnetized Moon Rocks
A team of scientists has proposed a novel model for the generation of a global magnetic field in the ancient moon, something that could help solve a decades-old mystery about the presence of magnetized rocks on the moon’s surface.
Since the moon currently has no global magnetic field, these rocks have puzzled experts since the days of the Apollo program.
The Earth’s magnetic field exists because it has a spinning solid core surrounded by hot metallic liquid, which churns around and generates magnetism. This “geodynamo” is powered by heat from the inner core, which drives the complex fluid motions in the molten iron of the outer core.
However, the moon is too small to support that type of dynamo, said Christina Dwyer, a graduate student in Earth and planetary sciences at the University of California, Santa Cruz, and lead researcher on the project.
Dwyer and her coauthors describe how an ancient lunar dynamo could have arisen from stirring of the moon’s liquid core driven by the motion of the solid mantle above it.
“This is a very different way of powering a dynamo that involves physical stirring, like stirring a bowl with a giant spoon,” Dwyer said.
The researchers calculated the effects of differential motion between the moon’s core and mantle. Early in its history, the moon orbited the Earth at a much closer distance than it does today (it continues to gradually recede from the Earth).
At close distances, tidal interactions between the Earth and the moon caused the moon’s mantle to rotate slightly differently than the core. This differential motion of the mantle relative to the core stirred the liquid core, creating fluid motions that could, theoretically, give rise to a magnetic dynamo.
“The moon wobbles a bit as it spins–that’s called precession–but the core is liquid, and it doesn’t do exactly the same precession. So the mantle is moving back and forth across the core, and that stirs up the core, ” said co-author Francis Nimmo, professor of Earth and planetary sciences at UC Santa Cruz.
The researchers found that a lunar dynamo could have operated in this way for at least a billion years, although it ultimately would have stopped working as the moon got farther away from the Earth.
“The further out the moon moves, the slower the stirring, and at a certain point the lunar dynamo shuts off,” Dwyer said.
Rocks can become magnetized from the shock of an impact, a mechanism some scientists have proposed to explain the magnetization of lunar samples.
But recent paleomagnetic analyses of moon rocks, as well as orbital measurements of the magnetization of the lunar crust, suggest that there was a strong, long-lived magnetic field on the moon early in its history.
“One of the nice things about our model is that it explains how a lunar dynamo could have lasted for a billion years,” Nimmo said.
“It also makes predictions about how the strength of the field should have changed over the years, and that’s potentially testable with enough paleomagnetic observations.”
However, more detailed analysis is needed to show that stirring of the core by the mantle would create the right kind of fluid motions to generate a magnetic field.
“Only certain types of fluid motions give rise to magnetic dynamos,” Dwyer said.
“We calculated the power that’s available to drive the dynamo and the magnetic field strengths that could be generated. But we really need the dynamo experts to take this model to the next level of detail and see if it works.”
A working model of a lunar dynamo, combined with more detailed paleomagnetic analysis of moon rocks, could give scientists a powerful tool for investigating the history of the moon, Dwyer said.
The current study presents a novel mechanism for generating a magnetic field not only on the moon, but also on other small bodies, including large asteroids, he said.
The research was published November 10 in the journal Nature.
On the Net: