U.S. Says China Developing Space, Cyber Threats

Posted on: Wednesday, 21 May 2008, 15:20 CDT

U.S. military officials named China as a threat to the United States and other countries in space.

Army Brig. Gen. Jeffrey Horne of the U.S. Strategic Command said China is developing counter-space capabilities, which could add to Beijing’s potential to curb access in the Taiwan Straits “and well beyond.”

Chinese People’s Liberation Army writings imply that China could target and enemy’s spy satellites along with navigation “to blind and deafen,” Horne said.

In early 2007, China showed off PLA’s counter-space capabilities by shooting down its own weather satellites. Horne said the unannounced destruction showed the PLA’s ability to attack satellites operating in low-Earth orbit.

Horne didn’t give details about the implications for possible U.S. responses to any Chinese attack on Taiwan but said the United States must "proactively protect our space capabilities."

The Pentagon's top three contractors by sales Lockheed Martin Corp, Boeing Co and Northrop Grumman Corp would be among the most likely to enter this market.

Another Strategic Command officer, Col. Gary McAlum said cyber attacks could be the most significant 21st century threat and China was already developing its capabilities.

Beijing could wield its power in an effort to take control of Taiwan, a self-ruled island of 23 million people.

Citing a report authored by Kevin Coleman of the Technolytics Institute, a McMurray, Pennsylvania, consultancy, McAlum said China hopes to achieve global "electronic dominance" by 2050. This would include the ability to interfere with information infrastructures.

"I think we could discuss that date offline," McAlum said before the Security Review Commission, a congressionally created advisory group.

One U.S. expert argued that it would be odd to expect China to sit still if it perceived a threat to its strategic weapons and communications in any future conflict.

"It is unreasonable to think that Beijing will permanently accept vulnerability," said David Lampton of the Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies and author of the new book "The Three Faces of Chinese Power: Might, Money, and Minds."

Another State Department official described China's nonproliferation record as mixed.

Patricia McNerney, principal deputy assistant secretary for international security and nonproliferation said that Chinese companies continue to ship weapons to Iran, despite evidence that Tehran is supplying insurgents in Iraq and Islamist groups.

However, McNerney said the United States had conferred with the China North Industries Corp, or NORINCO, and China Great Wall Industries Co. Their response has been "very encouraging," she said.

NORINCO had committed to not selling arms to North Korea and Iran and claims to have turned down more than $100 million in potential contracts with such governments.

"Both companies have adopted comprehensive internal compliance programs and are implementing policies to ensure that inadvertent transactions do not occur," she testified.


Source: redOrbit staff and wire reports

More News in this Category



Rating: 3.4 / 5 (5 votes)
Rate this article:
1/52/53/54/55/5

User Comments (1)

1. Posted by Kevin Coleman on 05/27/2008, 20:38
China is actively involved in the development of cyber weapons as I type this. This issue is dominance. The U.S. is growing our offensive and defensive capabilities as well. As I have said before. This is an arms race. The US, Russia and China are the leaders in the race. While we lead this race now, it be a back and forth race with the lead moving between the three. The only material needed to create cyber weapons is brains (scientists, engineers and software developers). In 2003, China graduated about 8 times the number of scientists, engineers as we did. If that is not bad enough, if China's economy continues to grow and they continue to invest the same percentage of GDP as they are now the military budget will exceed ours. They may outspend the U.S. in much the same way we out spent Russia in the cold war. This is an arms race ? and it will be much tougher to win than the last one!

Comment on this article

Your Name
Text from the image
Comment
max 1200 chars
* All fields are required

redOrbit Friends