NASA Images Suggest Water Still Flows on Mars
Posted on: Wednesday, 6 December 2006, 12:40 CST
NASA photographs have revealed bright new deposits seen in two gullies on Mars that suggest water carried sediment through them sometime during the past seven years.
"These observations give the strongest evidence to date that water still flows occasionally on the surface of Mars," said Michael Meyer, lead scientist for NASA's Mars Exploration Program, Washington.
Liquid water, as opposed to the water ice and water vapor known to exist at Mars, is considered necessary for life. The new findings heighten intrigue about the potential for microbial life on Mars. The Mars Orbiter Camera on NASA's Mars Global Surveyor provided the new evidence of the deposits in images taken in 2004 and 2005.
"The shapes of these deposits are what you would expect to see if the material were carried by flowing water," said Michael Malin of Malin Space Science Systems, San Diego. "They have finger-like branches at the downhill end and easily diverted around small obstacles." Malin is principal investigator for the camera and lead author of a report about the findings published in the journal Science.
The atmosphere of Mars is so thin and the temperature so cold that liquid water cannot persist at the surface. It would rapidly evaporate or freeze. Researchers propose that water could remain liquid long enough, after breaking out from an underground source, to carry debris downslope before totally freezing. The two fresh deposits are each several hundred meters or yards long.
The light tone of the deposits could be from surface frost continuously replenished by ice within the body of the deposit. Another possibility is a salty crust, which would be a sign of water's effects in concentrating the salts. If the deposits had resulted from dry dust slipping down the slope, they would likely be dark, based on the dark tones of dust freshly disturbed by rover tracks, dust devils and fresh craters on Mars.
Mars Global Surveyor has discovered tens of thousands of gullies on slopes inside craters and other depressions on Mars. Most gullies are at latitudes of 30 degrees or higher. Malin and his team first reported the discovery of the gullies in 2000. To look for changes that might indicate present-day flow of water, his camera team repeatedly imaged hundreds of the sites. One pair of images showed a gully that appeared after mid-2002. That site was on a sand dune, and the gully-cutting process was interpreted as a dry flow of sand.
Today's announcement is the first to reveal newly deposited material apparently carried by fluids after earlier imaging of the same gullies. The two sites are inside craters in the Terra Sirenum and the Centauri Montes regions of southern Mars.
"These fresh deposits suggest that at some places and times on present-day Mars, liquid water is emerging from beneath the ground and briefly flowing down the slopes. This possibility raises questions about how the water would stay melted below ground, how widespread it might be, and whether there's a below-ground wet habitat conducive to life. Future missions may provide the answers," said Malin.
Besides looking for changes in gullies, the orbiter's camera team assessed the rate at which new impact craters appear. The camera photographed approximately 98 percent of Mars in 1999 and approximately 30 percent of the planet was photographed again in 2006. The newer images show 20 fresh impact craters, ranging in diameter from 7 feet (2 meters) to 486 feet (148 meters) that were not present approximately seven years earlier. These results have important implications for determining the ages of features on the surface of Mars. These results also approximately match predictions and imply that Martian terrain with few craters is truly young.
Mars Global Surveyor began orbiting Mars in 1997. The spacecraft is responsible for many important discoveries. NASA has not heard from the spacecraft since early November. Attempts to contact it continue. Its unprecedented longevity has allowed monitoring Mars for over several years past its projected lifetime.
NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, manages the Mars Global Surveyor mission for the NASA Science Mission Directorate, Washington.
Image Captions
Figure A: This figure shows the southeast wall of the unnamed crater in the Centauri Montes region, as it appeared in August 1999, and later in September 2005. No light-toned deposit was present in August 1999, but appeared by February 2004. The 300-meter scale bar represents 328 yards.
Figure B: This picture is a colorized view of the light-toned gully deposit, draped over a topographic image derived from Mars Global Surveyor's Mars Orbiter Laser Altimeter data. The color comes from a table derived from the colors of Mars as seen by the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter's High Resolution Imaging Science Experiment.
Figure C: The third figure is a mosaic of several Mars Global Surveyor images, colorized using a table derived from Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter camera color data and overlain on a sub-frame of a Mars Odyssey Thermal Emission Imaging System image. The 1-kilometer scale bar represents about 0.62 miles.
Figure D: The fourth figure is a colorized view of the light-toned gully deposit as viewed from an oblique perspective, draped over topography derived from Mars Global Surveyor's Mars Orbiter Laser Altimeter data. The color comes from a table derived from the colors of Mars as seen by the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter camera.
Figure E: The first picture shows a pair of gully channels that emerge, fully-born at nearly their full width, from beneath small overhangs on the north wall of Dao Vallis. These overhangs are probably created by the presence of a hard-rock layer. Liquid, probably water, percolated through permeable layers just beneath these harder, more resistant rock layers. The arrow points to the place where one of the two neighboring channels emerges. This is a sub-frame of an image acquired on Jan. 10, 2006, located near 34.2 degrees south latitude, 268.1 degrees west longitude. The 150-meter scale bar is about 164 yards wide.
Figure F: The third picture shows a small crater on the rim of a larger crater. Only a small portion of the wall of this larger crater is captured in the image. Immediately beneath the small crater occurs a group of gullies. The presence of these gullies also supports the groundwater hypothesis because impacting meteors will fracture the rocks into which they form a crater. In this case, there would be an initial set of subsurface fractures caused by the large impact that created the original, large crater. Then, when the smaller crater formed, it would have created additional fractures in its vicinity. These extra fractures would then have provided pathways, or conduits, through which ground water would come to the surface on the wall of the larger crater, thus creating the gullies observed. One might speculate that the group of gullies was formed by the impact that made the small crater, because of the heat and fracturing of rock during the impact process. However, the gullies are much younger than the small crater; the ejecta from the small crater has been largely eroded away or buried, and the crater partially filled, while the gullies appear sharp, crisp and fresh. This is a portion of an image located near 33.9 degrees south latitude, 160 degrees west longitude, acquired on March 31, 2006.
---
For more information about NASA and agency programs, visit:
On the Web:
For more information about images from the Mars Orbiter Camera, see http://www.msss.com/mgs/moc/index.html
Related Articles
- Mars Water May Have Been Too Salty For Life
- Orbiter Provides Insights About Mars Water and Climate
- Mars Rover to Make Risky Crater Descent
- Mars Water Evidence Excites NASA Scientists
- Water Detection at Gusev Crater Described
- Mars water once flowed Lander finds telltale clues in crater rocks
- Mars water discovery shows Red Planet could once have been blue
- Mars rover data studied for sign of mineral linked to water; NASA
- Mars: water, river valleys, but was there life?
- Solar activity shut down instrument on Mars Odyssey, NASA says
User Comments (202)
| 152. |
Posted by Don on 12/06/2006, 22:08 http://palermoproject.com has been showing much more convincing NASA photos for years. Glad the scientists are finally catching on. |
| 151. |
Posted by Doctor Donut on 12/06/2006, 22:08 I sure as hell hope Nasa filters the water up there before they go and make themselves a pot of coffee. http://www.theweeklydonut.org/ |
| 150. |
Posted by Yags^7 on 12/06/2006, 21:59 Sorry, I forgot to include the translation in my last post. The message translates as: "Leave us alone Earthlings!" |
| 149. |
Posted by Fed Ex on 12/06/2006, 21:55 I was searching for Britney Spears and all I got was this picture. NASTY! |
| 148. |
Posted by Dyslexic Martian on 12/06/2006, 21:51 Leader to me take your. |
| 147. |
Posted by Sparky on 12/06/2006, 21:50 It's gotta be water, everytime I look at the picture, I gotta pee. I do see the Virgin Mary, too. She's throwing a football. |
| 146. |
Posted by ovidien on 12/06/2006, 21:33 life and water,after a night of drinking water is the only fluid existing on this planet to someone,evolution needs water desperatly ...my feeling is that is some kind of fluid way different than water. |
| 145. |
Posted by William on 12/06/2006, 21:27 It is truly amazing that the distinct possibility of water on mars can spark a partisan mud sling peppered with anti-immigration rhetoric. Who knew? |
| 144. |
Posted by Art on 12/06/2006, 21:19 Here's further evidence of liquid water! The Opportunity Rover caught this shot of what looks like a very recent geyser with a liquid-carved channel. NASA should park the rover there for a few weeks to watch for more water flowing. Link: http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/1/p/122/1P139018947EFF2809P2266L2M1.HTML |
| 143. |
Posted by Felang on 12/06/2006, 21:15 It is amazing to see how many people here are bitching about spending money on this subject, however pissing away billions of dollars a year bombing and killing other humans bearly gets a raised eyebrow. |
| 142. |
Posted by Bily Jiggs on 12/06/2006, 20:54 There are some freakin funny posts here BUT seriously... This is a very important find. If there is water, we can send someone there and *maybe* they'll be able to survive long enough to learn something. I'm not a huge fan of rovers. I think an astronaut with a shovel and a chemistry kit could answer a lot of questions. We would all benefit from that. |
| 141. |
Posted by Carole S. on 12/06/2006, 20:50 I thought we weren't supposed to read anything in to odd images, such as a face ? Maybe it's a crack. |
| 140. |
Posted by Icon Scout on 12/06/2006, 20:49 Yes! I see it! It's the Blessed Virgin! |
| 139. |
Posted by The American Taxpayr on 12/06/2006, 20:43 To all the whiners crying about how the money NASA spends should be used to fix the problems on Earth - Get Bent! We spend more than half trillion dollars every year "solving" the problems of society and where do we stand...more of the same problems. The Bureaucracy and the people who feed off it have no interest in solving these problems because it would put them out of work. A similar phenomenon is happening, caused by global warming proponents and the leeches feeding on the public teat, but that's for a later lesson. You want to solve the problems in society, close the welfare department and pour the budget into investments that produce jobs. And triple NASA's budget since the spinoff technology improves society. |
| 138. |
Posted by Tony on 12/06/2006, 20:35 When the Middle East runs out of water... they can ALL leave Earth and have Mars water. Kudos to NASA for finding the water. ;-) |
| 137. |
Posted by ET on 12/06/2006, 20:26 To the person who thinks water on Mars equates to life on mars, consider; Water is a requirement for life to exist, yes, but the opposite is not true. Life is not a requirement for water to exist. Only life equals life... And life can only arise from pre-existing life, that is, if you care to apply any known biological data or actual scientific observation to the equation. Don't just listen to the Professor, think for yourself; even if it makes you uncomfortable. |
| 136. |
Posted by joer on 12/06/2006, 20:21 demorats: let\'s cut and run... |
| 135. |
Posted by Bobo on 12/06/2006, 20:16 You goofy guys, mistaking this stuff for disinterested science when in reality it is just part of a recon for a livable environment for Americans to move to after we leave MexiMerica. Don't know how many miles between Earth and Mars, but seems like the only reasonable fence we will ever get. |
| 134. |
Posted by paul on 12/06/2006, 20:01 \'good thing we don\'t need the money being spent gazing at a dead planet on this one\' on what planet do you think the money was spent?// To that dumbskull "me", that money was not spent on the behalf of people here but on the behalf of a few egomaniacal scientists to gaze and fictionalize over a big dead rock. Use your head Mars brain, "on behalf of" was implied and anyone with a 6th grade education would get that. Good luck in Jr. High School! |
| 133. |
Posted by Dan R. on 12/06/2006, 19:57 It's a landslide you idiots, no water |
| 132. |
Posted by paul on 12/06/2006, 19:49 looks like a great place to dispose of Nuke Waste and other BS, like Barbara Streisand |
| 131. |
Posted by Goggles Paisano on 12/06/2006, 19:49 Most importantly, I heard that Gwyneth Paltrow prefers Martian dinner conversation. We started taking the pictures in the late 90s; Bush has been in office since Jan 01; How in the world can this be his fault? How in the world does this have anything to do with kids no getting out of high school with a diploma? The liberal answer to everything is to throw more taxpayer money at it. We spend more now on education than ever and the rates get worse. Maybe if we held someone accountable (teachers? parents? or heaven forbid, the students themselves?)? Ditto to #128 (Immigration should be encouraged, but through legal, controlled means....) |
| 130. |
Posted by Randy on 12/06/2006, 19:46 NASA probes have warmed Mars globally destroying all water and life. |
| 129. |
Posted by erik on 12/06/2006, 19:42 am i the only one that thinks that these geographic features are probably cause by natural flow of rock and dirt? |
| 128. |
Posted by Iron Chef Harley on 12/06/2006, 19:36 what a waste of money. quit trying to find other planets to strip mine and start focusing on fixing the mess here at home |
| 127. |
Posted by The eye in the sky on 12/06/2006, 19:32 The cyniical comments posted in response to this exciting article are evidence that we are a dying society with no hope, imagination or really, value. Too bad since we are on the verge of technology to populate the universe rather than this blue colored move on dot orca state... these pea brained liberal arts intellectual elite morons will bury us all with pseudo-science before "global warming" ever takes hold.. by the way, the moron who said it is a debris slide.. look at the slope side shot.. if there is no water on the planet, then the angle of repose of the slope (the theoretical maximum stability angle would stand) is about 30 degrees under the worst case situation.. much flatter than the water gully slope... |
| 126. |
Posted by EF'n Goofy on 12/06/2006, 19:20 NASA needs to superimpose the image with a photo Our Lady of the Viaduct. You know, the image of the Virgin under the bridge in Chicago. I swear the tears are the same. |
| 125. |
Posted by Mike Waldrep on 12/06/2006, 19:18 I wish scientists would put an end to this debate once and for all! |
| 124. |
Posted by Mike T on 12/06/2006, 19:13 I have seen gullys like this in a sand dune - a little vibration causes the sand to act like water. As far as 40% of the American youth not getting a HS diploma - shut down the borders and send illegal aliens home (with their children) and that rate will go way up - there is a direct correlation between overcrowded schools, combined with English being a second language at home and the high drop-out rate. Immigration should be encouraged, but through legal, controlled means so that we have the time to build and support the infrastructure to help them become productive citizens. |
| 123. |
Posted by Troy on 12/06/2006, 19:08 I'd rather NASA have my money than these feel good liberal programs that allow lazy, ignorant, do-nothings to continue being lazy, ignorant, do-nothings. It might not be the biggest story of the day, but it is science reporting, and certainly worth any intelligent persons time. |
| 122. |
Posted by Jay Johnson on 12/06/2006, 18:57 I'm absolutely blown away by these findings. It is amazing that we can engineer and place these wonderful machines in orbit around (and on the surface of) another world and get this flood of science. The achievement is made even more remarkable in light of the cynical nature of many of our fellows. What up with the conspiracy nuts and pillow biters?? |
| 121. |
Posted by Charleton on 12/06/2006, 18:50 Dude, it looks like The Virgin Mary. She's crying. Can you see it? |
| 120. |
Posted by Moyx on 12/06/2006, 18:49 Thank you Andrew. If that is water, then this IS an incredible discovery. We can only hope that this sampling of comments represents a minority of the population. |
| 119. |
Posted by DR DEEZ on 12/06/2006, 18:48 If I knew it was going to be this kind of party, i'd stick my **** in the mashed potatoes |
| 118. |
Posted by chris on 12/06/2006, 18:42 Since we refuse to save our own environment we better get out of here. This might be the only reasonable thing Bush has fudned in the last 6 years |
| 117. |
Posted by Dr.Know on 12/06/2006, 18:42 This image was filmed in a studio...that is the only explanation. |
| 116. |
Posted by Andrew on 12/06/2006, 18:41 For those of you bashing this find or egotistically thinking you know more than these scientists, you need to wake up. That is water flowing down that crater. This is an incredible discovery and the fact that you cant appreciate it amazes me. Water=life and if life used to, currently or has to ability to survive on Mars then that means we cant be alone in the universe. How can you dismiss that? |
| 115. |
Posted by ass dave sniffer on 12/06/2006, 18:39 I sniff davids dirty ass |
| 114. |
Posted by Sam on 12/06/2006, 18:38 Let's send Gwybeth Paltrow to see if it's safe for humans. |
| 113. |
Posted by AmericanPapist on 12/06/2006, 18:15 Water on Mars? Gee, that really changes my life. |
| 112. |
Posted by Jimbo on 12/06/2006, 18:14 I want to know what AlGore thinks about this! |
| 111. |
Posted by Bubba Gump on 12/06/2006, 18:06 I think it's martians making yellow snow. |
| 110. |
Posted by SirBuck on 12/06/2006, 18:06 Break out the aluminum foil!!!!! Time to make hats. |
| 109. |
Posted by Just curious on 12/06/2006, 17:42 I have a silly question.... What would happen if we dumped a few gallons of "earth" water onto mars? Would stuff grow...would it freeze? would it vaporise? I am just curious. |
| 108. |
Posted by Jack Meove on 12/06/2006, 17:29 I can see the water but not the face. How long will it be before NASA starts bottling and selling this stuf in the stores? |
| 107. |
Posted by Bipolar Bob on 12/06/2006, 17:14 Use the force, Luke! |
| 106. |
Posted by David on 12/06/2006, 16:56 I really hope something destroys the human race. You are nothing but a virus spreading on this planet. Bird flu, hurry up. So many humans like many of you posting idiotic comments need to weeded out of the gene pool. |
| 105. |
Posted by Jonesy on 12/06/2006, 16:43 cant we just drive theri with the little robot cars? Lets go. |
| 104. |
Posted by Jac Holtzman on 12/06/2006, 16:40 Hey, frig this Mars gizz stuff, what about this Kramer thing? What's up with that? COMEDIC GOLD!!!! |
| 103. |
Posted by Lloyd Christmas on 12/06/2006, 16:37 We landed on the Moon!!!! |







RSS Feeds