Spitzer Sees Light From Faraway Worlds
Posted on: Wednesday, 21 February 2007, 14:20 CST
NASA's Spitzer Space Telescope has captured for the first time enough light from planets outside our solar system, known as exoplanets, to identify signatures of molecules in their atmospheres. The landmark achievement is a significant step toward being able to detect possible life on rocky exoplanets and comes years before astronomers had anticipated.
"This is an amazing surprise," said Spitzer project scientist Dr. Michael Werner of NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, Calif. "We had no idea when we designed Spitzer that it would make such a dramatic step in characterizing exoplanets."
Spitzer, a space-based infrared telescope, obtained the detailed data, called spectra, for two different gas exoplanets. Called HD 209458b and HD 189733b, these so-called "hot Jupiters" are, like Jupiter, made of gas, but orbit much closer to their suns.
The data indicate the two planets are drier and cloudier than predicted. Theorists thought hot Jupiters would have lots of water in their atmospheres, but surprisingly none was found around HD 209458b and HD 189733b. According to astronomers, the water might be present but buried under a thick blanket of high, waterless clouds.
Those clouds might be filled with dust. One of the planets, HD 209458b, showed hints of tiny sand grains, called silicates, in its atmosphere. This could mean the planet's skies are filled with high, dusty clouds unlike anything seen around planets in our own solar system.
"The theorists' heads were spinning when they saw the data," said Dr. Jeremy Richardson of NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Md.
"It is virtually impossible for water, in the form of vapor, to be absent from the planet, so it must be hidden, probably by the dusty cloud layer we detected in our spectrum," he said. Richardson is lead author of a Nature paper appearing Feb. 22 that describes a spectrum for HD 209458b.
In addition to Richardson's team, two other groups of astronomers used Spitzer to capture spectra of exoplanets. A team led by Dr. Carl Grillmair of NASA's Spitzer Science Center at the California Institute of Technology in Pasadena, Calif., observed HD 189733b, while a team led by Dr. Mark R. Swain of JPL focused on the same planet in the Richardson study, and came up with similar results. Grillmair's results will be published in the Astrophysical Journal Letters. Swain's findings have been submitted to the Astrophysical Journal Letters.
A spectrum is created when an instrument called a spectrograph splits light from an object into its different wavelengths, just as a prism turns sunlight into a rainbow. The resulting pattern of light, the spectrum, reveals "fingerprints" of chemicals making up the object.
Until now, the only planets for which spectra were available belonged in our own solar system. The planets in the Spitzer studies orbit stars that are so far away, they are too faint to be seen with the naked eye. HD 189733b is 370 trillion miles away in the constellation Vulpecula, and HD 209458b is 904 trillion miles away in the constellation Pegasus. That means both planets are at least about a million times farther away from us than Jupiter. In the future, astronomers hope to have spectra for smaller, rocky planets beyond our solar system. This would allow them to look for the footprints of life -- molecules key to the existence of life, such as oxygen and possibly even chlorophyll.
"With these new observations, we are refining the tools that we will one day need to find life elsewhere if it exists," said Swain. "It's sort of like a dress rehearsal."
Spitzer was able to tease out spectra from the feeble light of the two planets through what is known as the "secondary eclipse" technique. In this method -- first used by Spitzer in 2005 to directly detect the light from an exoplanet for the first time ( http://www.spitzer.caltech.edu/Media/releases/ssc2005-09/index.shtml ) -- a so-called transiting planet is monitored as it circles behind its star, temporarily disappearing from our Earthly point of view. By measuring the dip in infrared light that occurs when the planet disappears, Spitzer can learn how much light is coming solely from the planet. The technique will work only in infrared wavelengths, where the planet is brighter than in visible wavelengths and stands out better next to the overwhelming glare of its star.
In the new studies, Spitzer's spectrograph, which measures infrared light at a range of wavelengths, stared at the two transiting planets as they orbited their stars. This allowed the astronomers to subtract the spectra of the stars from the spectra of the planets plus their stars to obtain spectra of the planets alone.
"When we first set out to make these observations, they were considered high risk because not many people thought they would work," said Grillmair. "But Spitzer has turned out to be superbly designed and more than up to the task."
Previous observations of HD 209458b by NASA's Hubble Space Telescope revealed individual elements, such as sodium, oxygen, carbon and hydrogen, that bounce around the very top of the planet, a region higher up than that probed in the Spitzer studies and a region where molecules like water would break apart. To do this, Hubble measured changes in the light from the star, not the planet, as the planet passed in front. The observations indicated less sodium than predicted, which again supports the idea that the planet is socked in with high clouds.
Astronomers hope to use Spitzer for additional studies of transiting exoplanets, which are those that cross in front of their stars from our point view. Of the approximately 200 known exoplanets, 14 are transiting. At least three of these in addition to HD 209458b and HD 189733b are candidates for obtaining spectra. Further spectral studies of HD 209458b and HD 189733b will also yield more information about the planets' atmospheres.
NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, Calif., manages the Spitzer Space Telescope mission for NASA's Science Mission Directorate, Washington. Science operations are conducted at the Spitzer Science Center at the California Institute of Technology, also in Pasadena. Caltech manages JPL for NASA. Spitzer's infrared spectrograph was built by Cornell University, Ithaca, N.Y. Its development was led by Dr. Jim Houck of Cornell.
---
On the Net:
For artist's concepts and more information, visit http://www.nasa.gov/spitzer and www.spitzer.caltech.edu/Media .
Related Articles
- Kepler Detects an Exoplanet Atmosphere
- NASA Needs Mars and Venus Manned Mission, Say Robert Weiner and Zoe Pagonis as Man-On-Moon 40th Anniversary Approaches; 'NASA's Not Dreaming Far Enough' Orlando Sentinel Op-Ed
- Spitzer Warming Up To New Career
- World Book Takes Students Out of This World With Special Feature on Mars: Exploring the Red Planet; Feature Taps NASA, Leading Experts in Space Exploration
- Spitzer Captures Cosmic Mountains of Creation
- Field Guide Created for Confirming New Earth-like Planets
- Red Planet Reconnaissance
- OUR OPINION Keep eye on Red Planet news Two NASA rovers will hunt for signs of life on Mars and provide stunning images along the way.
- Frozen Light: Cool NASA Research Holds Promise
- NASA Hopes to Capture Cosmic Nursery
User Comments (159)
| 109. |
Posted by Andy on 02/22/2007, 07:55 Oxigen+xenon= no oxigen on the surface of a planet. Therefore no life. Nothing breaths inert gases just for your pleasure |
| 108. |
Posted by infidel castrol on 02/22/2007, 07:06 Great. A, non bylined 'artist's rendering' being passed off as an image from distant worlds... Why not draw Ren & Stimpy orbiting it in a space ship with Marvin the Martian? Good job! Next on Jerry Springer! Actual photos of Elvis's home planet! |
| 107. |
Posted by SHAME ON YOU ALL on 02/22/2007, 04:35 I CAN'T BELEIVE IT TOOK THIS LONG TO PROVE THAT G-D EXIT, NOW WHAT THEY NEED TO DO IS TRY AND FLY PASS OUR SOLAR SYSTEM. I CAN'T WAIT TO SEE THE LOOK ON HUMAN FACE WHEN THEY SEE G-D FACE TO FACE. LOL |
| 106. |
Posted by pual Frank on 02/22/2007, 02:23 Can we send Hillary there??? |
| 105. |
Posted by Jeff on 02/22/2007, 00:40 Telstar, Thanks! I was hungry for thought. ;) Have a great night everyone, and it's still a very nice article! |
| 104. |
Posted by Eatmyass on 02/22/2007, 00:31 That's what I said, John, (113)!!! Now sleep knowing that the world is controled by idiots and butt-holes! What a refreshing thought! |
| 103. |
Posted by John on 02/22/2007, 00:19 All of you here are living proof that we are doomed. Everyone who has posted remarks here except for me is an *******! Please no responses. I'm going to bed |
| 102. |
Posted by telstar on 02/22/2007, 00:13 By the way, the light being analyzed from these planets was produced many many many years ago and is just reaching the instruments now. So any analysis of the spectral data is, inherently, vastly outdated. it's a snapshot of eons ago.Food for thought. |
| 101. |
Posted by Justin on 02/22/2007, 00:12 That's pretty unscientific of "Mad Scientist" to only look for bad examples of Christian behavior. If you examined the evidence comprehensively, you'd find that many Christians live up to their beliefs and serve as great examples of what Christianity should be (compassion, forgiving, open-minded etc). It's easy to find what you're only wanting to see. I am a Christian, and if I were you, I'd be thankful I don't judge all scientists by your hypocritical standards. Oh yeah, excellent article. That'd be really awesome if we were to find signs of life out there. |
| 100. |
Posted by This guy on 02/22/2007, 00:09 Jeff #107 grapefruit juice after toothpaste is pretty bad, but having a nieghbor that still jams out to Hansons "mmm bop" on a daily basis is reason for suicide. |
| 99. |
Posted by john on 02/22/2007, 00:06 "No waaayy?....WE LANDED ON THE MOON!\" |
| 98. |
Posted by Jeff on 02/22/2007, 00:06 Oregon Kirk, which am I? (Just curious, and fishing for another BLOG Authority ticket...) |
| 97. |
Posted by Jeff on 02/22/2007, 00:03 Steve, (#103) People are the second worst. Drinking grapefruit juice after brushing your teeth with mint toothpaste is the worst. ;) |
| 96. |
Posted by Jeff on 02/22/2007, 00:01 To Bill in FL, can you please cite me when you quote my ideas? Actually, I hope I'm not coming across as a troll, but it is fun poking fun at both sides, from the religeous "It isn't in the Bible, so it doesn't exist" to the "I'm a free thinker, so you religeous nuts better shut up!" To be totally (well, at least less covered up) honest, the two extremes aren't too far apart from each other. To my beliefs, the glory of God is intelligence, and I think that God wants us to explore and rethink the universe when new evidence comes into play. We really do know so very little of the universe, and the discoveries like this one are (IMHO) meant to challenge us to rethink where we sit in the whole plan (God's or whatever you may believe). To the "Bible is everything" people, can I offer a thought? Jesus was 32 when he was crucified; yet we can read about his life in a few hours. Do you think He had more to say than was written down? To the "Religon is an abomination" crowd: Science is the proving of existence of things (theorem, laws) by using a subtractive process. Since God can neither be proved nor disproved, why spend the energy on either? |
| 95. |
Posted by Mad Scientist on 02/21/2007, 23:25 wow, just wow......a great article!!! .....then to have the comment section littered with this rhetoric...... I am certainly looking foward to finding other planets they we may some day colonize, or if we are lucky, find other civilizations out there, so that us "evil science people" can leave this ill-fated rock and all you idiots behind......or, if you are truly correct....and some fat old dude floating in the nothing, created everything and took mud and gave it a blow job and made man.....and now he is so freaking scared if you don't worship him, he will punish you for all eternity.....if this is truly the case, and you guys are it...the top....the best there is....the perfect creation....you, the idiots.....then my one and only prayer is..."PLEASE BRING THE BIG ROCK FROM SPACE AND DESTROY THIS PLANET! AMEN"..... don't you have an abortion clinic to car bomb or something? didn't your shaman, or witch doctor or whatever it is, tell you that the internet is EVIL? just by reading a single line form the internet will send you straight to hell..... try www.truechristian.com....it's a mirror for you to see yourself in..... |
| 94. |
Posted by John on 02/21/2007, 23:06 "So few bullits" is right (post #65): "when i look to the heavens I see proof of god! ... Science is the finding of the answers to the mysteries of everything! god wishes us well in this i think!" Indeed: "For I reckon that the sufferings we now endure bear no comparison with the splendor, as yet unrevealed, which is in store for us. For the created universe waits with eager expectation for God's sons to be revealed." Romans 8:18-20 |
| 93. |
Posted by steve on 02/21/2007, 23:04 people are the worst |
| 92. |
Posted by Mastharnorvod on 02/21/2007, 23:01 Oh, NO! It's the dreaded planet Zyra orbiting the evil star Bellus to collide with Earth! We are all going to DIEEEE!!!!! Only a wealthy industrialist in a wheelchair who is willing to finance a suicidal one way colonization trip to another planet with a rag tag collection of colonists can save humanity now! |
| 91. |
Posted by GK on 02/21/2007, 22:16 I don't think most of these retarded religious posts are legit. They're trolls |
| 90. |
Posted by Chris on 02/21/2007, 22:00 Reply to post 49, Nancy. Perish the thought that people may want to know more about the world around them. Take your small world views and keep them to yourself. "People don't need to read that kind of thing, and it's just impolite" you ass! |
| 89. |
Posted by Fin F on 02/21/2007, 21:57 Everbody's a comedian. |
| 88. |
Posted by Human of Earth on 02/21/2007, 21:23 Religions, as well as the Indoctrination of Masses of People by the Wealthy and Powerful around ideas of "country" stand as the greatest problems and divisions on our planet today, as 9/11 proved. We must overcome these divisions if we are to have any sort of future, and one day join our Brothers and Sisters among the Stars. It is the one thing that a world must do, perhaps the hardest of all.. To lose the ancient Mythologies and Control Structures, while increasing their actual Connection to the Universe and Unity with one another. It all comes down to how you view US and the EARTH..as somehow in a bubble, created by some “god thingy” for its own amusement, separate from the rest of the Universe...Or, as part of the Universe, as much an Effect of Cosmic Cause as any Planet, Star or Galaxy. You decide. Choose. But you can only pick one. Now I must go feed my Hindu Rat Gods their milk, for I do not wish to burn in Hindu Rat God Hell or the Equiv. |
| 87. |
Posted by KeepOnTrying on 02/21/2007, 21:22 Relax, all you right-wing bigots. It wasn't not too long ago that the central church declared that the universe revolved around earth. NASA actually has done reseach and developed technologies that have made their way into our nation's defense. Since Bush doesn't mind using the tech, it must be ok! Maybe Jerry Falwell should do one of his 700 club reports on this. |
| 86. |
Posted by Oregon Kirk on 02/21/2007, 21:18 This is a great quality article which unfortunately is not mirrored in the quality of the majority of the commenters |
| 85. |
Posted by Victor Bergman on 02/21/2007, 20:58 Oh, NO! It's the dreaded planet Zyra orbiting the evil star Bellus to collide with Earth! We are all going to DIEEEE!!!!! Only a wealthy industrialist who is willing to finance a suicidal one way colonization trip to another planet with a rag tag collection of colonists can save humanity now! |
| 84. |
Posted by Bill in FL on 02/21/2007, 20:25 (For the record, I happen to be a creationist, but we can debate that some other time. I, for one, wish politics and science were not so intertwined.) For my fellow creationists: Please, please, please, PLEASE make sure your arguements are grounded in hard scientific fact. The Bible doesn't say anything about computers, or the US, does that mean that they don't exist? Now, on to the actual article.... it's actually an interesting discovery. Too bad it'll be forever and a day until we have the technology to these exoplanets, much less planets in our own solar system. It's such a shame that there is little public interest in space anymore. |
| 83. |
Posted by zero on 02/21/2007, 20:23 zero |
| 82. |
Posted by Timothy Pfaffenberge on 02/21/2007, 20:21 I'd rather ride a Moto Guzzi than read this |
| 81. |
Posted by I see, anyone can... on 02/21/2007, 20:08 ...reply to these articles. |
| 80. |
Posted by Obama-Rama on 02/21/2007, 19:49 Now that the MSM has broadcast their orgasmic pablum for Obama into the galactic ether, the entire universe has BO. |
| 79. |
Posted by Gary Gravitron on 02/21/2007, 19:46 Gravity is faster than light. Libs hate that. |
| 78. |
Posted by Wrongo Bongo on 02/21/2007, 19:43 Science is not an entity and Darwin is dead. |
| 77. |
Posted by Always Right on 02/21/2007, 19:42 I don't know which is goofier. People pretending to be scientists or scientists pretending to be people. |
| 76. |
Posted by Blue Ray on 02/21/2007, 19:34 Go to Google. Search on "Evidence The case for NASA ufo". Find Google of this video. Watch Part 1 then watch Part 2. Dan Aykrod introduces. Film taken from NASA's own camera on board space shuttle. Notice size of alien space craft. Some are two to five miles in diameter. In our earth orbit. Not lying what so ever. Try it. |
| 75. |
Posted by Hillary Obama on 02/21/2007, 19:31 Do you think TV signals from that planet will be purchased by HBO and made into an ANTIBUSH documentary? |
| 74. |
Posted by Ryan Friedrich on 02/21/2007, 19:05 I simply cannot believe people think the above picture is real in the first place. Im sorry if you're ignorant of astronomy or science. Im sorry if you still believe the earth is less than 20 thousand years old. Please go study something before you attempt to speak about. The above picture is an ARTISTS rendition. You RARELY see any space photograph that isn't an artists rendition. Its fairly well known in the space field that photos are taken and then artists color them up to look pretty so the public isn't bored by grayscale images. Some images have to use filters which if you bothered reading the specifications of the devices being used to TAKE the photos you would know. The photos of the martian surface were taken via various lenses that you can even READ about at NASAs website. NASA isn't a waste of money. Go back and do your research on the technologies that were developed because of various space missions. Im willing to bet atleast one of those technologies directly effects every one of you. I won't even get into the politics of wasted money in this country. Ryan |
| 73. |
Posted by Brucesky on 02/21/2007, 19:00 God is science and science is God |
| 72. |
Posted by No-one-home on 02/21/2007, 18:56 Well said #65. The way I see it, understand our universe and its creation through science helps bring me closer to understanding God. |
| 71. |
Posted by Jeff on 02/21/2007, 18:56 COOL!!! a twofer!!! (and I prefer to be called a "weisenheimer") |
| 70. |
Posted by Rich L on 02/21/2007, 18:48 You know, I'm personally both a Christian and a conservative, but that doesn't and shouldn't have anything to do with my view on space exploration. I don't doubt that they could eventually find some form of life on another planet, microorganisms, very primitive things, etc. . . but so what? Wake me up when they find actual intelligent life somewhere. Possible but even if it did exist on some planet, it's unlikely we'd be able to locate and identify it within the next million years. . But as far as exploring and understanding our universe, it's one of the most important things we can do. Maybe someday we'll even find a planet in a climate zone and atmosphere suitable for human colonization (granted there is no other life that we would be destroying) |
| 69. |
Posted by Will on 02/21/2007, 18:48 Our God can kick their God's butt... |
| 68. |
Posted by science buff on 02/21/2007, 18:47 As a serious scientist, I have great misgivings about recent work coming out of NASA, some of which borders on, well, fraud. They seem to be playing to the public far too much (see the pretty planet painting as part of the article, pure fiction). So when I see them now claiming that they can detect not just elements from a distant planet, but elements on (gasp) the TOP of the planet, I have to smile. I know the bottom line is that they seek constant funding, but for myself, anything coming out of NASA I view with great suspicion. Chlorophyl, lol. They couldn\'t detect Chlorophyl on earth from alpha centauri, let alone HD 209458b |
| 67. |
Posted by Paul on 02/21/2007, 18:40 SOME of the people that post on these sites claiming to be christians or religioius are neither. They are athiests trying to make somone look bad. I have coworkers that post criticizing books, authors and points of view they disagree with. Mostly they do it under pen names. SOMETIMES they make posts to make the point of view of their opponents look bad. NOT everyone is who they appear to be on the internet. This is the same as the old technique of getting press by having someone do something offensive anonamously and getting news coverage of it to make a group look bad. It's called Character assasination. NOT all incidents ascribed to some groups are committed by the groups. |
| 66. |
Posted by THE BLOG AUTHORITIES on 02/21/2007, 18:39 Edna and Nancy reported a list of you folks to us, and to avoid being too overly communistic, they supplied a list of reasons why each individual was reported. 1) Abdullah - REPORTED on 2/21. Reason: Offensive and impolite, with a shrill tone. 2)Jeff - REPORTED on 2/21. Reason: Smart-alecky, probably thinks he is smarter than everyone. 3)Balzy - REPORTED on 2/21. Reason: Suggestive name. 4)Rockets - REPORTED on 2/21. Reason: A proxy report because was mentioned by abdullah. 5) Debrah - REPORTED on 2/21. Reason: made things awkward for a moment. 6) Jeff - REPORTED AGAIN on 2/21. Reason: None, we just wanted to report him again. |
| 65. |
Posted by Paul on 02/21/2007, 18:37 If they posted the picture of the moon showing the flag and the moon lander and the ripples in the flag you would be able to figure out how well our spy sattelite technology works! ;) |
| 64. |
Posted by prays for ballzy on 02/21/2007, 18:30 its to bad you are so full of hate ballzy! most religions are about love and kindness and fairness! Of course you can idol the the non believers if you want such as pol pot, hitler, castro, stallen ... they were obviously better people in your eyes than a gentalman like jesus |
| 63. |
Posted by Peach on 02/21/2007, 18:30 Okay kids, play nice, its only an article about science. |
| 62. |
Posted by Saturn on 02/21/2007, 18:23 Poor lil' website. Drudge's monsters don't believe in planets. |
| 61. |
Posted by so few bullits on 02/21/2007, 18:20 when i look to the heavens I see proof of god! science has become religion to some it seems, just as politics is religion to socialists! But, that is not what science is or about! Science is the finding of the answers to the mysteries of everything! god wishes us well in this i think! |
| 60. |
Posted by Jeff on 02/21/2007, 18:18 After reading all the things about people despising the thing that they find offensive, I went back and read the article again. It's pretty cool how they use the subtractive technique to discover things like this. I also think it's pretty cool how they document everything they did to come up with the discovery. Now, after being totally enthralled with my postings, am I conservative or liberal; religous or secular...? |


RSS Feeds