Spitzer Sees Light From Faraway Worlds
Posted on: Wednesday, 21 February 2007, 14:20 CST
NASA's Spitzer Space Telescope has captured for the first time enough light from planets outside our solar system, known as exoplanets, to identify signatures of molecules in their atmospheres. The landmark achievement is a significant step toward being able to detect possible life on rocky exoplanets and comes years before astronomers had anticipated.
"This is an amazing surprise," said Spitzer project scientist Dr. Michael Werner of NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, Calif. "We had no idea when we designed Spitzer that it would make such a dramatic step in characterizing exoplanets."
Spitzer, a space-based infrared telescope, obtained the detailed data, called spectra, for two different gas exoplanets. Called HD 209458b and HD 189733b, these so-called "hot Jupiters" are, like Jupiter, made of gas, but orbit much closer to their suns.
The data indicate the two planets are drier and cloudier than predicted. Theorists thought hot Jupiters would have lots of water in their atmospheres, but surprisingly none was found around HD 209458b and HD 189733b. According to astronomers, the water might be present but buried under a thick blanket of high, waterless clouds.
Those clouds might be filled with dust. One of the planets, HD 209458b, showed hints of tiny sand grains, called silicates, in its atmosphere. This could mean the planet's skies are filled with high, dusty clouds unlike anything seen around planets in our own solar system.
"The theorists' heads were spinning when they saw the data," said Dr. Jeremy Richardson of NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Md.
"It is virtually impossible for water, in the form of vapor, to be absent from the planet, so it must be hidden, probably by the dusty cloud layer we detected in our spectrum," he said. Richardson is lead author of a Nature paper appearing Feb. 22 that describes a spectrum for HD 209458b.
In addition to Richardson's team, two other groups of astronomers used Spitzer to capture spectra of exoplanets. A team led by Dr. Carl Grillmair of NASA's Spitzer Science Center at the California Institute of Technology in Pasadena, Calif., observed HD 189733b, while a team led by Dr. Mark R. Swain of JPL focused on the same planet in the Richardson study, and came up with similar results. Grillmair's results will be published in the Astrophysical Journal Letters. Swain's findings have been submitted to the Astrophysical Journal Letters.
A spectrum is created when an instrument called a spectrograph splits light from an object into its different wavelengths, just as a prism turns sunlight into a rainbow. The resulting pattern of light, the spectrum, reveals "fingerprints" of chemicals making up the object.
Until now, the only planets for which spectra were available belonged in our own solar system. The planets in the Spitzer studies orbit stars that are so far away, they are too faint to be seen with the naked eye. HD 189733b is 370 trillion miles away in the constellation Vulpecula, and HD 209458b is 904 trillion miles away in the constellation Pegasus. That means both planets are at least about a million times farther away from us than Jupiter. In the future, astronomers hope to have spectra for smaller, rocky planets beyond our solar system. This would allow them to look for the footprints of life -- molecules key to the existence of life, such as oxygen and possibly even chlorophyll.
"With these new observations, we are refining the tools that we will one day need to find life elsewhere if it exists," said Swain. "It's sort of like a dress rehearsal."
Spitzer was able to tease out spectra from the feeble light of the two planets through what is known as the "secondary eclipse" technique. In this method -- first used by Spitzer in 2005 to directly detect the light from an exoplanet for the first time ( http://www.spitzer.caltech.edu/Media/releases/ssc2005-09/index.shtml ) -- a so-called transiting planet is monitored as it circles behind its star, temporarily disappearing from our Earthly point of view. By measuring the dip in infrared light that occurs when the planet disappears, Spitzer can learn how much light is coming solely from the planet. The technique will work only in infrared wavelengths, where the planet is brighter than in visible wavelengths and stands out better next to the overwhelming glare of its star.
In the new studies, Spitzer's spectrograph, which measures infrared light at a range of wavelengths, stared at the two transiting planets as they orbited their stars. This allowed the astronomers to subtract the spectra of the stars from the spectra of the planets plus their stars to obtain spectra of the planets alone.
"When we first set out to make these observations, they were considered high risk because not many people thought they would work," said Grillmair. "But Spitzer has turned out to be superbly designed and more than up to the task."
Previous observations of HD 209458b by NASA's Hubble Space Telescope revealed individual elements, such as sodium, oxygen, carbon and hydrogen, that bounce around the very top of the planet, a region higher up than that probed in the Spitzer studies and a region where molecules like water would break apart. To do this, Hubble measured changes in the light from the star, not the planet, as the planet passed in front. The observations indicated less sodium than predicted, which again supports the idea that the planet is socked in with high clouds.
Astronomers hope to use Spitzer for additional studies of transiting exoplanets, which are those that cross in front of their stars from our point view. Of the approximately 200 known exoplanets, 14 are transiting. At least three of these in addition to HD 209458b and HD 189733b are candidates for obtaining spectra. Further spectral studies of HD 209458b and HD 189733b will also yield more information about the planets' atmospheres.
NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, Calif., manages the Spitzer Space Telescope mission for NASA's Science Mission Directorate, Washington. Science operations are conducted at the Spitzer Science Center at the California Institute of Technology, also in Pasadena. Caltech manages JPL for NASA. Spitzer's infrared spectrograph was built by Cornell University, Ithaca, N.Y. Its development was led by Dr. Jim Houck of Cornell.
---
On the Net:
For artist's concepts and more information, visit http://www.nasa.gov/spitzer and www.spitzer.caltech.edu/Media .
Related Articles
- Kepler Detects an Exoplanet Atmosphere
- NASA Needs Mars and Venus Manned Mission, Say Robert Weiner and Zoe Pagonis as Man-On-Moon 40th Anniversary Approaches; 'NASA's Not Dreaming Far Enough' Orlando Sentinel Op-Ed
- Spitzer Warming Up To New Career
- World Book Takes Students Out of This World With Special Feature on Mars: Exploring the Red Planet; Feature Taps NASA, Leading Experts in Space Exploration
- Spitzer Captures Cosmic Mountains of Creation
- Field Guide Created for Confirming New Earth-like Planets
- Red Planet Reconnaissance
- OUR OPINION Keep eye on Red Planet news Two NASA rovers will hunt for signs of life on Mars and provide stunning images along the way.
- Frozen Light: Cool NASA Research Holds Promise
- NASA Hopes to Capture Cosmic Nursery
User Comments (159)
| 59. |
Posted by Abdullah on 02/21/2007, 18:18 Rockets, please report Edna to the Propaganda Authorities. I don't like her BS! |
| 58. |
Posted by Jeff on 02/21/2007, 18:13 It looks like the astronauts left a bunch of orange popsicles on the moon. Weird... moon.google.com |
| 57. |
Posted by Ballzy on 02/21/2007, 18:11 After reading these religious fanatics posts I remembered why I despise everything and anything that has to do with religion. |
| 56. |
Posted by Valhallow on 02/21/2007, 18:10 Neil Budde, if you're reading this, please do us all a favor and jump off of the Golden Gate Bridge! |
| 55. |
Posted by rockets red glare on 02/21/2007, 18:08 " BOB E " that guy did not make any referemces to his politics! What is really ignorant is your assumtion that he is a conservative or repuplican or what ever! In fact it is republicans are far and away more intrested in funding space exploration than liberals!! Most liberals think that if you spend a buck on space, it should have been spent on welfare, a very short sighted view.Thats a fact! They rarely see the the gains we make by spending on science! Look how they treet pharmasutical companies! Go back to school child, grow up and stop drinking the cooaid! |
| 54. |
Posted by Edna on 02/21/2007, 18:07 Will do Nancy. Thanks! |
| 53. |
Posted by Nancy Portlock on 02/21/2007, 18:06 Edna, please report abdullah to the blog authorities while you're at it. I don't like his tone!!! |
| 52. |
Posted by XSiter on 02/21/2007, 18:05 Can someone please identify the molecules of corpses outside our solar system that are worth azzraping. |
| 51. |
Posted by Abdullah on 02/21/2007, 18:04 Don't worry, Pedro, somebody will Photoshop a pic of Jesus' face in the clouds of an exoplanet for you. |
| 50. |
Posted by Pedro on 02/21/2007, 17:58 Our preacher said that God created all the other planets and stars just for their beauty and for us to enjoy them while here on earth. I wouldn't read too deeply into any of this space exploration stuff. |
| 49. |
Posted by Abdullah on 02/21/2007, 17:56 Sure, Nancy, we'll just all bury our heads in the sand because we shouldn't be using science at all, right? Remember that when you give your kids an immunization shot and your man his heart medications. |
| 48. |
Posted by Edna on 02/21/2007, 17:56 I'm reporting all inappropriate comments on this blog to the authorities. I can not and will not let these improper comments go unpunished. |
| 47. |
Posted by Dave on 02/21/2007, 17:55 Christian? Oh well then you wouldn't understand science anyway, so go read the bible. |
| 46. |
Posted by Roccotool on 02/21/2007, 17:51 There's no water on the exoplanet because the aliens drove cars and warmed the planet, ruining it. Seriously, though, this is great news and a great way to look for life elsewhere. I'll look forward to seeing the results of the other three planets. |
| 45. |
Posted by Nancy Portlock on 02/21/2007, 17:51 I'm a conservative Christian, and while I have deep respect for scientists and what they do, I feel that if they want to find something that contradicts they bible, they should just let go of it and research a different topic. People don't need to read that kind of thing, and it's just impolite! |
| 44. |
Posted by The Black Genesis on 02/21/2007, 17:48 Who cares about this. Anyone have any good black / white dating site links? |
| 43. |
Posted by MoonU on 02/21/2007, 17:48 There is a new program from g**gle that has pictures of the monn, You can see all of the moon landing sites and the crap left behind. Just zoom in really close. http://moon.google.com/ |
| 42. |
Posted by Donnaesty on 02/21/2007, 17:47 That's cool what they can do with telescopes these days. |
| 41. |
Posted by Bro. Larry Parker on 02/21/2007, 17:45 They can't even see the rivers on the surface of Neptune, what makes you think they can see what planets are composed of 1,000,000 times further away than Neptune? |
| 40. |
Posted by Jeff on 02/21/2007, 17:44 Honestly, if the flat Earth Society finds the end of the earth, I want them to come back and tell us about it. Better yet, build a city at the edge of the Earth and sell tickets. I would really find it interesting, if not profitable. I really don't take offense to anyone, or their opinions. What they put down really says more about them that it does about me. |
| 39. |
Posted by Mark Fleming on 02/21/2007, 17:39 Gray, I hardly think Irving is a creationist, not with a name like that. He's probably a liberal, cuz he thinks he's cute and smart. As for those of you who can't understand the basic concept of science, why are you reading this article? From your comments, you obviously don't have the capacity to understand it, or to even realize what parts are speculative and illustrative. Which probably explains why so many of you are unable to discern the lies from reality that the liberal media spews every day. |
| 38. |
Posted by PASTAFARIAN on 02/21/2007, 17:38 David2... Hold a moment... ok, CAPS LOCK: ENGAGED! SO, YOU SAY SOMETHING ABOUT FOCUS BEING PART OF THE SENSORS NOT ON THE LENS BLAH OPTICS BLAH BLASPHEMY SPOUT HOLE BLAH I CAN\'T LISTEN TO ANY MORE OF YOUR LIES! NEXT, YOU\'LL BE TELLING ME THAT THE EARTH IS 4.5 BILLION YEARS OLD AND THAT IT REVOLVES AROUND THE SUN, AND THAT THE HUMAN ORGANISM IS THE RESULT OF A LONG, PROTRACTED EVOLUTIONARY PROCESS AND NOT A RESULT OF GOD MAGIC! GO \"SPOUT\" YOUR SECULAR HOOEY-BOOEY ELSEWHERE, \"DOC\"! |
| 37. |
Posted by Cindybin on 02/21/2007, 17:37 REC'D TO POST # 38. |
| 36. |
Posted by Debra on 02/21/2007, 17:35 I take offense to the irresponsible person with the "Special Olympics" comment. I have a daughter who is mentally retarded and it really hurts when I read such insensitive comments. Good bye! |
| 35. |
Posted by HB on 02/21/2007, 17:34 Most of the posters here belong to the flat EARTH Society.THEYshould keep on walking until THEY find the edge of Earth and then keep on walking .By Their Posts THEYshow how Ignorant Todays Puplic is when it comes to truly amazing DISCOVERIES.It makes me sick to read such nonsense. |
| 34. |
Posted by Danny on 02/21/2007, 17:33 Just last week NASA was discovering how to deal with one of their female astronauts going psycho on them. This is much better news. Now if we could hurry up and get some men on Mars. This is something that could be accomplished in 2 to 3 years if we had our hearts in it. |
| 33. |
Posted by Ih8 moerahns on 02/21/2007, 17:28 Jeff, LMAO. Tim, Grats on coining that phrase and being the first ever to use it anywhere! |
| 32. |
Posted by Tim on 02/21/2007, 17:26 For goodness sake do not feed the trolls. Arguing on the internet is like competing in the Special Olympics. You may win, but you're still retarded. |
| 31. |
Posted by Jeff on 02/21/2007, 17:22 Nor does the Bible mention this computer that I am typing from, thereby making it, and everthing that we type or read nonexisitent. Following this, the story is non-existent as well, and so is the argument. (Don't even get me started on the "never seeing a person's brain..." track...) whew... Anyway, this is a really cool article, and how God got into this whole shebang is really beyond my thinking. I think God really has a cool thing going with the Universe, and the fact that we are discovering all this neat stuff is really a testament to a Creator. |
| 30. |
Posted by David2 on 02/21/2007, 17:18 PASTAFARIAN... THERE IS NO FOCUS ON OR NEAR THE SURFACE OF THE LENS ITSELF, BUT RATHER ON THE SENSORS THAT ARE WELL BEHIND THE LENS. LEARN MORE ABOUT OPTICS BEFORE YOU SPOUT YOUR HOLE HERE. |
| 29. |
Posted by thinkaboutit on 02/21/2007, 17:17 Hey, on the order of "takes one to know one"... Please don't fall for "pastafarian's" rambling. I'm a Christian. Born again, believe the Bible, the whole thing (and yes I am a conservative, too). There's nothing at all unbiblical about extrasolar planets and Pastafarian knows that. I would suspect that he's someone just having a bit of fun pretending he's a Christian gone mad. Even the name Pastafarian ought to give you a clue if you're paying attention. As for the story itself...we have a universe full of extrasolar stars, so why would anyone have an issue with extrasolar planets? Now, I don't believe in the little green men, but that's another story. |
| 28. |
Posted by Paul on 02/21/2007, 17:17 I was refering to comments 1-13. |
| 27. |
Posted by Iheight Murons on 02/21/2007, 17:17 You people that don't understand what the article is saying need to take a science class or stfu. Light is gathered and then split via a prism. The prism breaks up the light into it's different wavelengths. Light is emitted when photons energize and then go back to ground state. Due to this, they can determine chemical composition of said light by determining the pattern that comes out from the prism. The problem with the internet is you don't have to be educated to use it. The same problem with voting. At least 50% of the world is stupid, and that's where our problem lies. If you think the picture is real, or are afraid of science from a religious stand point, please go become a martyr or try to disprove gravity by walking across the grand canyon, kthxbai. |
| 26. |
Posted by Carlo Progera on 02/21/2007, 17:16 Yeah, right. I remember a few months ago they tried to tell us a "red cat-like animal" was discovered in South America. Yet all they could do was show us a painting of one. Wow. When are we going to see bigfoot paintings? |
| 25. |
Posted by Paul on 02/21/2007, 17:16 I found the article to be interesting. Then I read the previous 13 comments and am amazed at how stupid people really are. I am now dumber for having read these comments. (with the exception of maybe one) If ignorance is bliss, then you are the most blissful people on this planet. You would think that people reading an article of this nature would have half a brain. |
| 24. |
Posted by Gray on 02/21/2007, 17:09 I am really interested in planetary sciences. As soon as I get out of prison I am going to attend college to learn more about this. Thank God they let me on the Internet here. |
| 23. |
Posted by Dad on 02/21/2007, 17:07 That "picture" is a painting by Derablo Ancetti. |
| 22. |
Posted by Robert Conner on 02/21/2007, 17:07 Mr. Poe, that image is nothing more than an artist's concept of what one of those planets might look like. It's not a photograph, obviously. Try opening your eyes, and not be so quick to bash. Difficult though it may be to believe, you might actually learn something. Bob E., I am a conservative, and I embrace science, as do most conservatives. Real science that is, not political hogwash disguised to look like science. Nor is it necessary to slam someone for their beliefs if they differ from yours. That's childish and immature. Please, act like an adult. |
| 21. |
Posted by Derrick Hobernor on 02/21/2007, 17:06 Irving Stinkfinger, Stars twinkle because of greenhouse gases caused by factories in China. |
| 20. |
Posted by winks on 02/21/2007, 17:04 stars don't twinkle... its our atmosphere that makes then appear to... |
| 19. |
Posted by Axlenut on 02/21/2007, 17:03 Great, now they gotta place to bury Anna Nicol Smith's rotting carcass. I agree, dump NASA, give the money to the Air Force and use it for space weapons and things to kill people, usefull things. |
| 18. |
Posted by Mindless1 on 02/21/2007, 17:00 Convictions and religious dogma clouding the understanding of science on the right is almost as old as the hypocrisy in the form of generalizations and stereotypes present on the left... Emancipate yourselves from mental slavery, People!!! |
| 17. |
Posted by Pastafarian on 02/21/2007, 16:56 Listen- nowhere in the bible does it talk about extrasolar planets. Therefore, we can deduce one of three things: 1) The liberal scientist conspiracy is again trying to infect the minds of the christian youth with hate-filled secular propoganda, 2) The devil put those planets up there to confuse us, or 3) They're not planets! They're probably planet shaped TANG smudges on the hubble lens (or a stain coming from another type of powdered beverage- I'm not sure if they even make TANG anymore) . Using Occam's razor, we can see that the most obvious out of those three is that the devil put them there. See? Mystery solved, AND it was solved using your scientists' precious so-called 'reasoning'. Talk about using the weapons of secular villainy against itself! BOO-YAH!!!!! |
| 16. |
Posted by Reason on 02/21/2007, 16:56 What is wrong with you people? Let's see what we have here...one who thinks the moon landing was fake, one that makes a political statement about "real science" versus intelligent design, and one that claims conservatives turn their noses up at science. (Please show me the data on each of these arguements.) This story presents the work of some scientists..nothing more nothing less. There are no laws that say these folks are right or wrong, they are just presenting their findings. |
| 15. |
Posted by scanner on 02/21/2007, 16:55 So the dirt is in the sky and the ground is gas? |
| 14. |
Posted by Kelly J on 02/21/2007, 16:54 I amazes me that Bob E can so casually ascribe a Political viewpoint to an unknown person based on a single comment, then apply his broad-brush of rhetoric to denegrate that group based on his own Political bias. Where's the tollerance Bob? |
| 13. |
Posted by Kelly J on 02/21/2007, 16:51 Mr. Poe; you do realize the picture you so casually dismiss is only an artists illustration to give the article a bit of glitz? |
| 12. |
Posted by Rob on 02/21/2007, 16:47 You guys have to take into consideration that the hubble pictures you are refering to are for the light sensitive part. Infered telescopes are diffrent technology. |
| 11. |
Posted by maxx_frostt on 02/21/2007, 16:41 When will we learn? The government will Never cease to amaze me in their attempts to flood us with life that we don't need or want. We have enough DNA on our planet there is no reason to bring illegal alien DNA to Earth. Everyday you read about the homeless and starving DNA in Ethiopia and other cities in Wisconsin. We can't take care of the DNA we have, why do we insist on bringing more and overpopulating the planet. Illegal DNA will take the jobs of legal taxpaying DNA and demand the same rights legal DNA has. I feel sorry for any DNA that ends up here, unwanted, unloved, no place to call home and just not generally accepted by Native DNA. When will we learn we are not god and leave those poor DNA's alone? Sad really. |
| 10. |
Posted by Mr Poe on 02/21/2007, 16:40 NASA is such a waste of money. They never discover anything useful anymore, and most of the crap they 'discover' is argued and disputed by scientists, then is believed to be BS. This is just their way of convincing us that they're actually doing something with our freakin' money. They're not. |


RSS Feeds